1 / 11

Quantum and semi-classical transport in RTDs using NEMO 1-D

Quantum and semi-classical transport in RTDs using NEMO 1-D. Gerhard Klimeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology gekco@jpl.nasa.gov (818) 354 2182 http://hpc.jpl.nasa.gov/PEP/gekco

rusty
Télécharger la présentation

Quantum and semi-classical transport in RTDs using NEMO 1-D

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quantum and semi-classical transport in RTDs using NEMO 1-D Gerhard Klimeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology gekco@jpl.nasa.gov (818) 354 2182 http://hpc.jpl.nasa.gov/PEP/gekco This research was carried out by at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

  2. 20/50/ 2 Software Engineering Object-Oriented Principles Documentation Tool Resonance Finder Physics Phonons Ionized Dopants Charging Formalism Green Function Theory & Boundary Cond. Material Param. Database Novel Grid Gen. Alloy Disorder Band- structure Interface Roughness Graphical User Interface Hybrid C, FORTRAN FORTRAN90 Testmatrix Library of Examples Batch Run Interface NEMO 1-D:A User-friendly Quantum Device Design Tool Good News! I mean great news! After 5 years of agony with Raytheon release problems: JPL can release the code to US institutions with a US government contract that requires / would benefit from NEMO use! • NEMO was developed under a government contract to Texas Instruments and Raytheon from 1993-97 • >50,000 person hours of R&D • 250,000 lines of code in C, FORTRAN and F90 • NEMO 1-D maintained and NEMO 3-D developed at JPL ‘98-’02 (>12,000 person hours) under NASA funding. Since ‘02 NSA and ONR funding. • Based on Non-Equilibrium Green function formalism • NEMO in THE state-of-the-art heterostructure design tool. • Used at Universities, Government Labs, Industry. • Bridges gap between device engineering and quantum physics. Transport/ Engineering Quantum Mechanics / Physics er

  3. Density of States right reservoir left reservoir NEMO Breakthrough:Simulations of Devices With Realistic Large Extent • Quantum Optical Switch • Calculate charge self-consistently in • the left and right reservoir • central device region

  4. Generalized Boundary Conditions:Boundaries as a Scattering Problem Three Critical Simulation Domains:left reservoir, central device, right reservoir Dynamics Kinetics How good is the reservoir assumption? Flat Fermi Level -> Zero Current

  5. Couple NEGF in Central Device toDrift-Diffusion Equation in Reservoirs • Central Device • Carriers injected from reservoirs , need Fermi level in left/right edge • Fermi level not defined in central device. • Current / Charge from NEGF • Current imposed on reservoirs • Reservoirs: • Current imposed by central device • Gradient of Fermi level at each site imposed by current. • Charge from EGF and Fermi level • Self-consistency: • Poisson • NEGF • Drift-Diffusion

  6. Current Voltage Characteristic • Compare µ=infinite, µ=20,000cm2/Vs, µ=10cm2/Vs • Low mobility -> similar to series resistance Vapplied = Vinternal+R I->stretch of voltage axis -> bi-stability

  7. “Resistance” is not Constant! • Compare µ=infinite, µ=20,000cm2/Vs, µ=10cm2/Vs • Low mobility -> similar to series resistance Vapplied = Vinternal+R I->stretch of voltage axis -> bi-stability

  8. Peak Current Depends Weakly on Mobility • Compare µ=infinite, µ=20,000cm2/Vs, µ=10cm2/Vs • Low mobility -> similar to series resistance Vapplied = Vinternal+R I->stretch of voltage axis -> bi-stability

  9. High Mobility V=0.32V • µ=20,000cm2/Vs • Potential difference only in the quantum well. • High current state -> charge accumulation in well • Low current state -> empty quantum well

  10. Low Mobility V=0.35V • µ=10cm2/Vs • Potential difference in emitter and quantum well. • High current state -> charge accumulation in well • Low current state -> empty quantum well, accumulation in notch

  11. Comparison to Experiment & Conclusions Experiment: • Show I-V curves from two different devices from different wafers-> 15% peak current deviation • Introduction of finite mobility has small effect on overall I-V curve for high performance RTDs Conclusion: • Demonstrated coupling of drift diffusion to NEGF simulation. • Flat Fermi levels in reservoirs a pretty reasonable assumption. Future work: • Need to combine the intrinsic resistance simulation with a quantum capacitance calculation • Need to look at low performance RTDs with long spacer layers and low carrier densities.

More Related