1 / 25

OASIS Active Objects, Semantics, Internet, and Security

OASIS Active Objects, Semantics, Internet, and Security. www.inria.fr/oasis. Large Scale, Parallel and Distributed Systems Middleware, Programming Models & Semantics, Verification Challenge: Safe & Efficient & Big Our current Scale range: 500 nodes to 5 000 nodes

ryanortiz
Télécharger la présentation

OASIS Active Objects, Semantics, Internet, and Security

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OASISActive Objects, Semantics, Internet, and Security www.inria.fr/oasis Large Scale, Parallel and DistributedSystems Middleware, Programming Models & Semantics, Verification Challenge: Safe & Efficient & Big Our current Scale range: 500 nodes to 5 000 nodes Targets: Grids and P2P, both Scientific and Enterprise

  2. OASIS: A Threefold Approach ASP Calculus & Formalism PLATFORMS VerCors Active Object & Components Specification & Verification

  3. OASIS Team Composition • PostDoc: • Regis Gascon (INRIA) • Engineers (10 en 2009): • Elaine Isnard (AGOS) • Fabien Viale (ANR OMD2, Renault ) • Franca Perrina (AGOS) • Germain Sigety (INRIA) • Yu Feng (ETSI, FP6 EchoGrid) • Bastien Sauvan (ADT Galaxy) • Florin-Alexandru.Bratu (INRIA CPER) • Igor Smirnov (Microsoft) • Fabrice Fontenoy (AGOS) • open (Thales) • Trainee: • Etienne Vallette d’Osia (Master 2 ISI) • Laurent Vanni (Master 2 ISI) • Visitors • Interns • Researchers: • D. Caromel (UNSA, Det. INRIA) • E. Madelaine (INRIA) • F. Baude (UNSA) • F. Huet (UNSA) • L. Henrio (CNRS) • Assistants: • Patricia Maleyran (INRIA) • Sandra Devauchelle (I3S) • PhDs (11): • Antonio Cansado (INRIA, Conicyt) • Brian Amedro (SCS-Agos) • Cristian Ruz (INRIA, Conicyt) • Elton Mathias (INRIA-Cordi) • Imen Filali (SCS-Agos / FP7 SOA4All) • Marcela Rivera (INRIA, Conicyt) • Muhammad Khan (STIC-Asia) • Paul Naoumenko (INRIA/Région PACA) • Viet Dung Doan (FP6 Bionets) • Virginie Contes (SOA4ALL) • Guilherme Pezzi (AGOS, CIFRE SCP)

  4. A cut on First Class Futures Active Objects • Distributed Components • Formalization: ASP Calculus  Specification + Verification (MC)

  5. Publications & Standards • From very Theoretical to very Practical: • POPL • FORTE • SPE • ECOOP • OOPSLA • CCPE • IPDPS • EuroPar • IJPP • CCGrid • SuperComputing (SC) • Official ETSI Standards: • ETSI TC Grid

  6. ProActive : Active objects JVM A A WBN! A ag =newActive (“A”, […], VirtualNode) V v1 = ag.foo (param); V v2 = ag.bar (param); ... v1.bar(); //Wait-By-Necessity JVM ag v2 v1 V • - Wait-By-Necessity • is a Dataflow • Synchronization • AO in Shared Memory: • NoC Java Object Active Object Req. Queue Future Object Proxy Thread Request 6

  7. First-Class Futures Update 7

  8. Wait-By-Necessity: First Class Futures V= b.bar () b v v Futures are Global Single-Assignment Variables a b c.gee (V) c c 8

  9. Groups of Active Objects A V A ag =newActiveGroup (“A”, […], VirtualNode) V v = ag.foo(param); ... v.bar(); //Wait-by-necessity JVM Group, Type, and Asynchrony are crucial for Cpt. and GRID Typed Group Java or Active Object 9

  10. Objects to Distributed Components (1) A Example of component instance V Truly Distributed Components Typed Group Java or Active Object JVM 10

  11. GCM Components (Fractal Based) • Capturing • Group Communications • and • Synchronizations • At the level of interfaces • Multicast and GatherCast

  12. GCM + MxN Direct Communications MultiCast GatherCast Scopes and Objectives: Grid Codes that Compose and Deploy No programming, No Scripting, … No Pain Innovation: Composite Components Multicast and GatherCast

  13. GCM Standardization One of the Outcomes of the Technical Committee on Grid Computing • Overall, the standardization is supported by industrials: • BT, FT-Orange, Nokia-Siemens, Telefonica, • NEC, Alcatel-Lucent, Huawei …

  14. CalculusASP: Asynchronous Sequential Processes

  15. (2) ASP: Asynchronous Sequential Processes • ASP  Confluence and Determinacy Future updates can occur at any time Execution characterized by the order of request senders Determinacy of programs communicating over trees, … • A strong guide for implementation, checkpointing, Model-Checking, …

  16. VerCors:Specification and Verification

  17. B (3) Verification: AO and Futures • Behavioral Specification: VerCors • Primitive Behavior with State Machine • Parameterized Hierarchical LTS Verification+Safe Code Generation • Model Checkable composition NF Queue Proxy Body Req… Resp… LF • First-Class Future: • In good Progress: • Can remove Dead Locks • Need to add NF part for • Propagation + Update: any Strategy • Need for Handling Infinite Behaviors: • E.g.: Request Queues, Topologies • First Proto ?bind !start P(p) C(c) Func. VerCorsframework (UML EMF)

  18. ProActive Video 1: Programming+Optimizing

  19. ProActive Video 2: Scheduling (CPER)

  20. ProActive Video 3: On Amazon Cloud

  21. Publications & Standards • From very Theoretical to very Practical: • POPL • FORTE • SPE • ECOOP • OOPSLA • CCPE • IPDPS • EuroPar • IJPP • CCGrid • SuperComputing (SC) • Official ETSI Standards: • 2 Approved: GCM Deployment & Application (with support from BT, FT-Orange, Nokia-Siemens, Telefonica, NEC, Alcatel-Lucent) • 2 Pending: GCM ADL & API

  22. ConclusionObjectives for the next four years

  23. Objectives & Scientific Challenges Efficient and Safe, Distributed and Parallel, Middleware&Applications • Clear Focus: No Operating Systems, No VMs, No JVMs • We keep investigations with our 3 strongly Intertwined Axes: (1) Active Objects and Distributed Components: Scale, Speed, Safety • E.g.Sterile Requests allowing for aggressive optimizations (ASP proven) • Efficient large scale execution with Asynchrony, Groups, P2P (2) Calculus and Formalisms for Distributed Computing: Machine Proven ASP • Formally prove the confluence of ASP Imperative • Specific Confluence: Stateful and Stateless object for global richer properties (3) Specification/Verification for Distributed Systems: Verification that scales • Real program: Exceptions, Multicast/Gathercast, First Class Futures • Handling Infinite parts of the systems (e.g. Request Queue, Topology)

  24. Concrete Milestones 2010: • Safe and efficient execution of Active Objects+Components on 10 000 Cores • Previous objective was stated at 5 000, we did 4 200 in 2008 Grid Plugtests • Demanding: Model + Architecture + Fault-Tolerance + Code + Tools • Safe Dynamic Reconfiguration of 500 Distributed Components (DAG, then Cycles) • Using Determinacy properties of ASP • Dealing with/Using the Asynchrony of Active Object • Bridging Active Objects, Distributed Components and SOA: • From Safe Reconfiguration to Safe Adaptability • Enforcement of QoS to respect SLA (HP, Oracle, …) • Model Checkable composition: Real Industrial Use Case by Non-Specialist • We achieved 16 Components, 5 levels, 10 parameters (CoCoMe benchmarks) • Concrete objective: from Specification to Safe Code Generation (reconfig.)

More Related