1 / 17

Würm Ice Age (110 000 – 10 000 BCE)

Würm Ice Age (110 000 – 10 000 BCE). Würm Ice Age : Chronology. Würm Ice Age : Climate Record. Würm : map. Holocene : Climate Record. The Three Diffusion Models of the IE Languages. Ursprache (proto-language) Urvolk (first people) Urheimat (homeland) Hypothesis I : Invasionist

rylee-rice
Télécharger la présentation

Würm Ice Age (110 000 – 10 000 BCE)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Würm Ice Age (110 000 – 10 000 BCE)

  2. Würm Ice Age : Chronology

  3. Würm Ice Age : Climate Record

  4. Würm : map

  5. Holocene : Climate Record

  6. The Three Diffusion Models of the IE Languages Ursprache (proto-language) Urvolk (first people) Urheimat (homeland) Hypothesis I : Invasionist Hypothesis II : Farming Hypothesis III : Continuity

  7. Archaeologic Cultures in Western Europe during the Holocene

  8. Model I : Invasionist (Kossinna) • Theoretician : Gustav Kossinna - 1911 • Homeland : Northern Germany • Date : 4000 BCE • Expansion Mode : Military Conquest → Horse + Bronze Weapons + Wheel • Indigeneous Population (AltEuropäische) = peasants + matriarcal (Mother Goddess) • Proto-Indo-Europeans : Nomadic Warriors + patriarcal

  9. Model I : Invasionist (Kossinna) - map

  10. Model I : Invasionist (Gimbutas) • Theoretician : Marija Gimbutas • Homeland : Ukraine 1960 • Date : 3000 BCE • Expansion Mode : Military Conquest → Horse + Bronze Weapons • Indigeneous Population (AltEuropäische) = peasants + matriarcal (Mother Goddess) • Proto-Indo-Europeans : Nomadic Warriors + patriarcal

  11. Model I : Invasionist (Gimbutas) - map

  12. Objections Which proofs does the Invasionist Model requires ? • An archaeologic culture stretching from the homeland to western Europe and India. No. • Items attesting the use of horses in combat. No. • Archeologic attestation of significant battles. No. • A good reason to move from the homeland : why should they bother to go anywhere else ? No. « The need for conquest ». • A highly hierarchized society allowing the constitution of a warrior caste. No.

  13. What do we actually have ? • A common lexical stock BUT • Very few words are common to ALL the IE languages (around 10) • Some words may have been borrowed from neighbouring languages (ex; the numbers) : inheritance vs. borrowing. • Common grammatical features (verb and noun flexion, affixation) : very little chance of borrowing

  14. Model II: Neolithic Dispersal Theory (Colin Renfrew) • An archaeologic culture stretching from the homeland to western Europe and India : the spread of farming from the Fertile Crescent to North-Western Europe (-7000/-3000 BCE) • Items attesting the use of horses in combat. No combat • Archeologic attestation of significant battles. No battles • A good reason to move from the homeland : the demographic rise occasioned by agriculture. • A highly hierarchized society allowing the constitution of a warrior caste. No hierarchized society needed.

  15. Model II: Neolithic Dispersal Theory : principles • Hunter-Gatherers : 10km² = 1 people. One side = 3,3km. 30 people = 30 x 10 = 300km². One side = 17km • Farming : 1km² = 10 people. 300km² = 3000 people Objections : • Many PIE roots are connected with farming. Renfrew’s urvolk did not know farming originally • No IE toponymy in the Near-East. • No correlation between the alleged migrations and the languages phylogeny *aretrom (plough): aratrum, arazr, ardhr (VI), arklas (Lit), ralo (Pl) *gwrawon (millstone): yugam (Sk), breo (Br.), kvern (Is), zrunuvi (OS) *yugom (yoke): yugam (Sk), igo (OS), juk (Got), ieo (Br), yukan (Hit).

  16. Model III: Palaeolithic Continuity Theory • Theoretician : Mario Alinei 1990 • Homeland : Refugees in Ice Age Europe (Spain, Balkans, Ukraine) • Date : 20 000 BCE • Expansion Mode : No expansion • Objection : - Where do the substrata languages (Iberian, Basque, Etruscan, Minoan, etc.) come from ?

  17. Summary • I- Invasionist : 3000 BCE in Ukraine, military conquest of Europe and Asia (Kossinna – Gimbutas) • II- Neolithic Dispersal Theory: 6000 BCE in the Near East, pacific spread of farmers (Renfrew) • III- Palaeolithic Continuity Theory : 20 000 BCE in Europe, without migration.

More Related