1 / 13

Taking it forward: Summary of implications for donors raised to date

Joint evaluation of GBS: Policymakers Forum, May 10 2006, OECD, Paris. Taking it forward: Summary of implications for donors raised to date. Kate Tench, MG Chair. Structure. Need to take forward… Grouping the issues… What does PGBS achieve? Entry conditions / thresholds PAF / Indicators

saber
Télécharger la présentation

Taking it forward: Summary of implications for donors raised to date

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint evaluation of GBS: Policymakers Forum, May 10 2006, OECD, Paris Taking it forward: Summary of implications for donors raised to date Kate Tench, MG Chair

  2. Structure • Need to take forward… • Grouping the issues… • What does PGBS achieve? • Entry conditions / thresholds • PAF / Indicators • Civil society • Complementarities • Other issues • Outstanding questions • Wedding and family

  3. Need to take forward… • All agree: valuable report and joint nature valuable • Value of PGBS – as an important instrument – need to increase share (<100%) • Lessons and good practices for both partners and donors at national and international levels • Recommendations to be acted • on because of depth/breadth

  4. What does PGBS achieve? • PFM improvements central – capitalise? • Basic services direct poverty effect (+proxy) • PRS to reach growth and poverty – PRS2 expansion • PRS quality and prioritisation central • Engage all donors in prioritisation • Need to show results domestically for sustainability (Rwanda)

  5. Entry conditions/thresholds • No standard minimum thresholds • Macro and fiscal stability important • Political commitment to poverty important • Direction of change in PFM • So, broad relevance including to fragile states (?fiscal/macro?) • Incremental, learning approach • Joint diagnostics (pol, econ, capacity) • Transparency of rationale • Care and analysis in decision to enter, need to remain L-T: Exit costs

  6. PAF / Indicators • PAF as operational plan for PRS (all donors, diverse indicators) • Transparent governance/political conditionality indicators • Currently no agreed definitions / levels • Ranking or prioritising indicators • Indicators at all levels – tracking spend • Outcome indicators/virtual earmarking useful to focus on results • but all indicators as management tools not triggers

  7. Good practice in design • Context of local needs / flexibility • Good practice in management of M/L-T predictability (?) • Decentralisation a gap • Long term approach: EC proposal for predictability in MDG financing / managing risks • Graduated responses – diversity of: indicators / instruments / variable tranches (earmarking?) • Avoid polarisation of partners - inclusive • Permit use of forex reserves for management of predictability • Risk appraisal and management : shared+diverse

  8. Civil Society • Targeting basic services and empowerment require CS voice • Opening space for CS – including donors with aid dependent partners • But neutrality? Closing off other voices? • Accountability not just S: CS (+Parlia) promotion of D to be part of PGBS package • Engagement through PRS?

  9. Aid instrument mix is key – what is the optimal mix/how decide? No proportions Country determined mix complement not compete ‘[PGBS is an] indispensable but not exclusive instrument’ (Switzerland) TA to be linked more strategically (levels) Growth – not necessarily programmatic aid But, don’t focus on complementarities to ignore PGBS recommendations Complementarities

  10. Other… • Staffing: deconcentration and longer postings / skills in political analysis of commitment to poverty reduction / policy analysis / PGBS skills • ‘P’ = mutual/joint accountability • Evaluation framework – evidence (NOAM)

  11. By whom… • Evaluation role concludes • dissemination incl summaries/in country/NOAM • SPA – corruption • DAC (beyond guidelines?) • Mgt for Dev Results • Govnet – shared pol econ analysis • WP EFF

  12. Outstanding questions • Confusion on indicators? Not no. but disbursement link and ownership • Poverty impact: services proxy enough? • Scaling up and critical values for rev effect GP on within year + M/L-T predictability (incl. mgt of trust breakdown) • Relevance to other country categories • Regional BS for infrastructure (to whom?) • How achieve accountability/reporting to domestic constituents - honesty • What role safeguards?

  13. PGBS Marriage…and family Courtship Wedding Family Trust of PGBS instruments Clear Prenup

More Related