1 / 8

Vienna 1 st June , 2010

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF SPENT FUEL FROM NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS Session 6 : Stakeholder Issues C. Pescatore, Chair. Vienna 1 st June , 2010. Panel members. Mr. Junichiro MIYASHITA – Japan ; Mayor ( Mutsu ; hosting city of Japan’s first SF interim storage facility)

sachi
Télécharger la présentation

Vienna 1 st June , 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF SPENT FUEL FROM NUCLEAR POWER REACTORSSession 6 : Stakeholder IssuesC. Pescatore, Chair Vienna 1st June , 2010

  2. Panel members • Mr. Junichiro MIYASHITA – Japan ; Mayor (Mutsu; hosting city of Japan’s first SF interim storage facility) • Mr. Rolf PERSSON – Sweden ; Local Community Organization (Oskarshamn) • Mr Gustavo GONZALEZ – Chile ; Disarmament expert from Ministry Foreign Affairs • Mr Mariano MOLINA – Spain ; Industrial implementer (company connected to national government) • Mr. Thomas FLÜELER – Switzerland ; Independent specialist from academia and cantonal government officer • Mr. Claudio PESCATORE – OECD/NEA ; Independent specialist , close to national Governments of the OECD.

  3. WHY STAKEHOLDER ISSUES ? • Stakeholder = anyone with an interest (Aarhus Convention; OECD/NEA) • Public has already voiced both concerns about, but also interest in, spent fuel management. • In modern democracies there is no future for spent reactor fuel management without public involvement … • shared or publicly supported decisions result in in more durable solutions and, because of this, better solutions by and in them themselves (good balance between technical and social demands) • localities and regions in most countries possess a host of legal means to block any unwanted project

  4. Panel members’ countries situations regarding spent power-reactor fuel • Chile ; Nuclear power under study • Spain ; Several NPPs; SF is waste; Siting process for national centralised facility • Sweden ; Several NPPs; SF is waste; National centralised facility operating; close to developing SF repository • Switzerland ; Several NPPs; SF is waste; No national centralized storage facility; ongoing siting process for SF repository • Japan ; Several NPPs; SF is resource; No national centralised facility;

  5. Four questions - 1 • In your personal view or experience, what is the “symbolism” associated with spent fuel? Namely, what images it inspires, what attitudes it promotes ?

  6. Four questions - 2 • If a spent fuel management facility (storage or disposal) is foreseen/proposed in a community: how to build a durable relationship between the facility and the community?Which would be the main ingredients for it? Do you have examples?

  7. Four questions - 3 • Is spent fuel management a national problem, or one between the owner of the SF and the host communities of the various facilities (interim storage, long-term storage, disposal)?

  8. Four questions - 4 • To what extent the timescale(s) for managing the spent fuel is (are) an issue to the various stakeholders?  Do you have actual examples and data?

More Related