500 likes | 620 Vues
Introduction to EU Institutions. 1 April 2014. Who cares. What is the point of institutions? Need ‘agents’ to carry out a mission And if MS are deprived of day-to-day control, this promotes stable policies, which in turn promotes investment and legal security t
E N D
Introduction to EU Institutions 1 April 2014
Who cares • What is the point of institutions? • Need ‘agents’ to carry out a mission • And if MS are deprived of day-to-day control, this promotes stable policies, which in turn promotes investment and legal security • t • What is the point of having multiple institutions? • 1. Specialization / division of labor • 2. Altro?
Which institutions? • The EU: an institution of many institutions • ________ • ________ • ________ • ________ • ________ • ________ • ________
Plus various advisory bodies and agencies • Economic and Social Committee • Committee of the Regions • European Environmental Agency • European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products • European Chemicals Agency • EU Agency for Fundamental Rights • Many others …
The prevailing cliché:A sui generis organization-- for many reasons, but we’ll focus on the institutional framework
Five main institutions (four political, one judicial):Commission Council European Council European Parliament Court of Justice
European Commission • Promotes the general interest of the Union; takes appropriate initiatives (Art. 17 TEU) • t • Many roles: • - ‘Guardian of the Treaties’ • - Initiator of most EU legislation • - ‘The Executive Branch’ • - Conducts external relations (but not CFSP) • Humanitarian aid • Trade relations
Organization of the Commission • 25,000 employees (for 500 million citizens) • U.S. executive branch: about 2 million • t • Divided into about 33Directorates-General • t • Agriculture / Climate Action • Competition / Education and Culture • Employment, Social Affairs, Inclusion / Enterprise • Internal Market / Trade • Many others
President of the Commission • Leader / manager / power to fire • t • President is first approved by the European Council on a vote by QMV • t • Then – Lisbon raised EP’s profile in two sensest • t • 1. Must take account of the EP elections • t • 2. President is formally elected by the EP itself
College of Commissioners • 28 people serving five-year, renewable terms • t • The 26 are first proposed by their respective MS, then affirmed by the Council in common accord with the President • t • Then the group of 28 must be approved en masse by the EP • t • (Technically, after EP approval the group is finally confirmed by the Council voting by QMV)
A ‘collegiate’ body: Commissioners act as a group • t • But of course, Commissioners can disagree • Can vote, but in practice the norm is to seek compromise and, if possible, act by consensus • t • On rare occasions, disagreements go public, but since the President can force a Commissioner to resign, this is risky for the dissenter
1. Guardian of the Treaties • t • Commission “shall ensure the application of the Treaties [and secondary law]” (Art 17(1) TEU) • t • Enforces the law against the MS (Action for failure to fulfil obligations, Art 258 TFEU) • t • Enforces the law against sister institutions (Council), bodies, agencies (Arts 263, 265) • t • Enforces the law against persons (Arts 101, 102)
2. The ‘Right of initiative’: a ‘monopoly’ on the right to propose legislation (Art 17 TEU) • t • The ‘monopoly’ is more apparent than real • t • TFEU enables the Council (241) and the EP (225) to recommend that the Commission make a proposal in a given policy area; if the Commission fails to do so it must justify its inaction • t • And informally, the Commission is in constant contact with the other institutions, so they always have some input • t • Citizens’ initiative (Art 24 / Reg211/2011/EU)
3. Executive powers • t • Coordinating, executive and management functions • Implements the EU budget • Administers the EU’s special funds: • European Social Fund • European Development Fund • European Agriculture Fund • European Regional Development Fund • t • And other delegated and implementing powers (Arts 290-291 TFEU)
First of all • Council (of the EU) does notmean ‘European Council’ • Council means ministers that act as legislators • European Council: Heads of State and Government (plus Commission President); it decides on the grand, political direction of the EU
The Council • Intergovernmental! National interests! t • One of the two main legislators (with EP) t • (Based on EurCncl Guidelines) Defines and implements the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) t • Forum for coordination of national economic policies, employment policies, asylum/visa/border policies and operational police cooperation • t • Council never stays the same …
The Council • The actors participating are national ministers • Example, if a proposal for renewable energy is being discussed, it is the Council, meeting as the ‘EnvironmentCouncil’, that discusses the text • t • and the participants will be the national ministers responsible for the environment (assisted by a civil servant) • Ten ‘Council’ configurations …
General Affairs (consistency; prepares work of European Council) • Foreign Affairs • Economic and Financial Affairs • Justice and Home Affairs • Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs • Competitiveness • Transport, Telecommunications and Energy • Agriculture and Fisheries • Environment • Education, Youth and Culture
Presidency of the Council • Council meetings are chaired by the minister from the MS that occupies the Presidency • (Except Foreign Affairs Council – High Rep) • The Presidency rotates every 6 months • 2013: Ireland, Lithuania • 2014: (now) Greece, July-December, Italy • 2015: Latvia, Luxembourg • Since 2006, Presidencies work in ‘trios’ to carry out an 18-month program. • Example: the trio right now consists of Lithuania, Greece and Italy
Presidency tasks • Chair meetings • Determine the agenda • Facilitate compromise between the MS • Represent the Council when it deals with the institutions and bodies of the EU, e.g., during the legislative process • Overall, very heavy workload • Small MS can only handle it because they can borrow resources in the trio context
Voting in the Council • Some measures can only be adopted by unanimous vote (ad es. tax, foreign pol., pensions) • But most are subject to QMV • t • Authors of the Treaties of Nice and Lisbon have given us complex definitions of QMV • One system until Halloween • A second system applies from 01.11.14 to 31.03.17 • A third system applies starting 01.04.17 • t • But here is a simple version: from 01.11.14, Council votes by Double Majority. Three rules..
1. At least 55% of the MS (so, 16 of 28); and • t • 2. total population of the MS forming the majority must account for at least 65% percent of the population of the EU; poi… • t • 3. ‘Anti-Triumvirate’ Rule: To block legislation, there must be at least four MS opposing, and they must represent at least 35% of the population of the EU • t • But in practice, most decision-making is done if possible by consensus…
The HSG + Comm. Pres., typically acting by consensus • t • 58 sitting around a table (min. 4 times/yr) • (HSG, Foreign Ministers, plus Comm. Pres. & one other Comm.) • t • Gives the EU “the necessary impetus for its development and … define[s] the general political guidelines thereof” (Art 4 TEU) • t • Finally became an ‘institution’ of the EU (Art 13 TEU) • t • And for the first time, Treaty (Arts 262-263 TFEU) gives jurisdiction to ECJ to review acts of the European Council if they having binding legal effects on natural or legal persons
Gives the EU its political direction • Resolves disputes that become seemingly impossible to resolve at level of the Council • Defines principles / guidelines of the CFSP • Decides whether a revision of the Treaties is required • Appoints the President of the European Council • Proposes to EP candidate for Pres. of the Commission • Selects the High Rep for Foreign Affairs • Determines existence of a serious and persistent breach of the EU’s founding values(including basic human rights) – ex Art 7 TEU (leading to suspension of privileges)
European Council • New position following Lisbon: full-time President of the European Council (no more 6-month rotations) • Term of 2.5 years, renewable once • Currently: Herman von Rompuy • Elected by European Council (QMV) • Must not be, contemporaneously, a national official • Tasks: prepares the work of the EC • Chairs its meetings • Seeks to facilitate consensus • Handles foreign policy, without prejudice to the powers of the High Rep • Reports to the EP after each meeting of the EC
Today (and especially since 1999), functions as co-legislator with the Council • t • Adopts EU budget jointly with the Council (OLP) • t • Grants consent to certain international agreements (if the subject would normally be legislated internally by OLP) • t • May propose a Treaty revision to the European Council • t • Exercises political control over the Commission • t • Typically a Commissioner will submit a report to the EP and then appear before it to defend the relevant activities carried out over the last year
Composition of the EP • Max. 750 + EP President • The greater the population, the more MEPs allocated • Example (today): • Germany, 99 • France, Italy, UK 77 • Spain, Poland 50 • Poveri Estonia, Luxembourg 6 • t • Of course you have the center-right (EPP) and the center-left (Alliance of Socialists and Democrats) • … and many others
The EP: organization • President of the EP, elected by the MEPs • 14 VPs • Current President: Martin Schulz (SPD), center-left • Numerous committees and subcommittees • 20 permanent ones • Reviewing, amending and adopting legislation
Court of Justice (and the General Court)(and specialized courts)
Court of Justice & the General Court (ilTribunale) • t • So far, only 1 specialized court (Civil Service Tribunal), judgments appealed to the GC • t • Don’t forget the national courts, which can act, in a sense, as ‘EU courts’ when they enforce EU law • t • And when they use the preliminary reference procedure (Art 267) • t • Main task of the ECJ and the GC: • t • to ensure that in the interpretation and application of the Treaties the law is observed (Art 19(1) TEU)
ECJ: 28 (well paid) judges plus 11 (w. paid) AGs • Each judge/AG has 4 (w. paid) referendaires • GC: 28 (w. paid) judges, w/ 3 wp refs, basta • 6 years, renewable. How is a judge appointed? • t • First, a MS proposes judge of recognized competence • Or a non-judge – e.g., a professor (example: Kokott, Mengozzi, Lenaerts, Van derWoude, etc.) • t • Then an ‘Article 255’ panel assesses the candidate’s qualifications • 7 ex-members of the ECJ and GC, members of national supreme courts, and one panelist appointed by the EP
ECJ • Role of the Advocate General • t • To make, in open court, a reasoned submission and recommend to the ECJ how it should dispose of a case (Art 252 TFEU) • t • The AG does not participate in every case • t • Since 2003, he gives an opinion only if the ECJ thinks that a case raises a new point of law • t • Is the Opinion of the AG binding on the ECJ? • t • Are AG Opinions important?
ECJ: organization • The President: • Three years, renewable • t • Duties / powers: • t • Directs the judicial business and administration of the Court • t • Can grant interim measures (misurecautelari) • t • Can suspend application of a contested act • t • E.g., can suspend enforcement of monetary sanctions imposed buy the Commission or the Council pending resolution of an appeal
ECJ: decision-making • ECJ can sit as a ‘Full Court’, 28 (min. 15) judges • Only in (very) exceptional cases • t • As a ‘Grand Chamber’ – 13 judges (min. 9) • Cases of complexity or importance • t • Otherwise, chambers of three or five judges • t • Are Grand Chamber judgments more authoritative as precedents? • t • Dissenting opinions by the judges?
ECJ: jurisdiction • Three types: contentious, non-contentious and ‘consultative’ • 1. Contentious proceedings (non-exhaustive) • Appeals against GC judgments on points of law • Typically in actions for annulment • t • Actions against a MS for failure to fulfill obligations under EU law (Arts 258-259) • t • Actions for annulment brought by a MS against the Council and/or the EP (Art 263) • t • Actions for failure to act (Art 265)
2. Non-contentious proceedings • = Preliminary references (Art 267 TFEU), Italian idea • 60% of the 700 avg. annual cases • = Questions of EU law arising in a national court • Either the interpretation of EU law • Or the validity of EU acts (not national acts) • La ratio: uniform interpretation of EU law • Is it obligatory for a national court • (i) to ask the ECJ for a ruling? • Most courts versus ‘final’ courts • Final courts: Acteéclairé, i.e., already decided, or – Acteclair, i.e. obvious solution • (ii) to follow the ECJ’s interpretation?
3. (Binding!) ‘Consultative’ proceedings • t • Council, Commission, EP or a MS can ask the ECJ whether an int’l agreement w/ third countries or w/ IOs is compatible w/ the Treaties (Art 218(11) TFEU) • t • If incompatible: must renegotiate or amend Treaties • Relevant today: EU is acceding to the ECHR • t • If not invoked ex ante, no ex post mechanism to attack the validity of an agreement • t • But (hypothetically…) an EU or national act that implements the agreement can be set aside
The General Court • Organization and decision-making same as the ECJ: (e.g., 6-yr terms, Grand Chamber, small chambers) • t • As for jurisdiction, some differences: • Actions for annulment, actions for failure to act (Arts 263, 265) • EU contractual liability (Art 272) • Appeals from the EU’s specialized courts • Competition law cases (appeals against Commission) • Antidumping cases (e.g., where duties are imposed on Korean manufacturers) • Cases concerning EU trademarks
Specialized Courts • Established on a proposal from the Commission after consultation with the ECJ, or at the request of the ECJ after consultation with the Commission • t • Civil Service Tribunal • Since Dec. 2005 • Seven judges • Handles staff cases, e.g., denial of pensions, dismissals, etc. • t • For the future: maybe an IP tribunal to handle the trademark cases …
ECJ: relationship w/ other courts • National courts: ‘jugescommunautaire de droitcommun’ (AG Bot in Case C-555/07, Swedex) • t • Ingenious, in that it is national courts, not a supranational court, that rule on national acts • t • ECtHR: For the ECJ, the ECHR is already a source of inspiration • t • The ECJ has occasionally deviated from the interpretations of the ECtHR • t • But if Draft Agreement is endorsed by ECJ, then ratified by all sides (EU, MS and MS of CoE), acts of the ECJ will be contestable before the ECtHR