1 / 27

Neue Perspektiven in der Therapie Follikulärer Lymphome

Neue Perspektiven in der Therapie Follikulärer Lymphome. Rituximab – Chemotherapy Combinations. OR. PFS. OS. CVP 57 % 15 mo 85 % R-CVP 81 % (p<0.001) 32 mo (p<0.001) 89 % (p=0.22) Marcus et al. 2005

sadah
Télécharger la présentation

Neue Perspektiven in der Therapie Follikulärer Lymphome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. email@med.uni-muenchen.de Neue Perspektiven in der Therapie Follikulärer Lymphome

  2. Rituximab – Chemotherapy Combinations OR PFS OS CVP 57 % 15 mo 85 % R-CVP 81 % (p<0.001) 32 mo (p<0.001) 89 % (p=0.22) Marcus et al. 2005 CHOP90 % 31 mo 90 %R-CHOP 96 % (p=0.011) n.r. (p=0.0006) 95 % (p=0.016) Hiddemann et al. 2005 MCP 75 % 26 mo 74 % R-MCP 92 % (p=0.0009) n.r. (p<0.0001) 87 % (p=0.0096) Herold et al. 2007 CHVP+IFN 72 % 35 mo 79 % R-CHVP+IFN 81 % (p<0.0001) n.r. (p<0.0001) 84 % (p=0.029) Salles et al. 2008

  3. CHOP versus R-CHOP for First-Line Therapy Time to Treatment Failure 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 R-CHOP (120/135) Randomised R-CHOP (216/283) Randomised CHOP (145/276) p<0.0001 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years after start of therapy

  4. CHOP versus R-CHOP for First-Line Therapy Overall Survival RandomisedR-CHOP (270/283) R-CHOP (131/135) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Randomised CHOP (248/276) p=0.0101 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years after start of therapy

  5. Key Steps in Improving Treatment for Follicular Lymphoma Cure Prolongation of Life Palliation of Symptomes email@med.uni-muenchen.de

  6. Future Strategies in Follicular Lymphomas Therapy in Remission Induction Maintenance ASCT No further Therapy Chemotherapy plus Rituximab => Lymphoma Reduction => Lymphoma Control email@med.uni-muenchen.de

  7. FLIPI and Time to Treatment Failure low intermediate high

  8. Follicular Lymphomas Questions for the Next Steps of Therapy Value of R maintenance after R chemo in first line therapy Best chemotherapy to be combined with Rituximab Value of radio-immuno therapy Value of stem cell transplantation after R chemo

  9. Maintenance (SAKK) 1 dose q 2 months for 24 months follicular NHL stages III–IV, untreated • 6 x CHOP • 6 x FCM • 6 x COP • plus 8 x R R CR/PR Observation PDs/SDs off study PRIMA Study 2005 Follicular Lymphomas

  10. Maintenance (SAKK) 1 dose q 2 months for 24 months follicular NHL stages III–IV, untreated • 6 x CHOP • 6 x FCM • 6 x MCP • plus 8 x R R CR/PR Observation PDs/SDs off study OSHO/GLSG Study 2007 Follicular Lymphomas Not eligible for PBCT or Age > 65 Yrs. R

  11. FIT: 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan as first-line consolidation 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (n=208) Newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma stage III/IV Induction chemotherapy* CRPR ** R watch & wait (n=206) NR PD off study R Randomisierung FIT: First-line Indolent lymphoma Trial * CVP, CHOP, Fludarabin (combination), etc. ** n = 414 Hagenbeek, ASH 2007;110: abstr 643

  12. FIT: 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan as first-line consolidation Progression-free survival Log rankp < 0.0001HR 0.463 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan:median 37 mo (n=208) Control: median 13.5 mo(n=206) Hagenbeek, ASH 2007;110: abstr 643

  13. GLSG Study `96 pts. < 60 yrs. (<65yrs.) R a n d o m i z a t i o n R a n d o m i z a t i o n PBSCT 6 - 8 x MCP CR,PR standard IFN-maintenance pts. > 60 yrs. (>65 yrs.) 6 - 8 x CHOP intensive IFN-maintenance CR,PR standard IFN-maintenance Hiddemann et al., Blood 2005

  14. GLSG – Progression freeSurvival Lenz et al., Blood 2004

  15. ASCT in 1st Remission: Analysis from two Consecutive Study Generations of the GLSG R a n d o m i z a t i o n 6 – 8 x CHOP R a n d o m i z a t i o n pts. < 60 yrs 6 – 8 x MCP ASCT GLSG 1996 IFN-maintenance GLSG 2000 R a n d o m i z a t i o n 6 - 8 x CHOP + Ritux pts. > 60 yrs IFN-maintenance 6 - 8 x CHOP

  16. ASCT in 1st Remission: Analysis from two Consecutive Study Generations of the GLSG R a n d o m i z a t i o n 6 – 8 x CHOP R a n d o m i z a t i o n pts. < 60 yrs 6 – 8 x MCP ASCT GLSG 1996 IFN-maintenance GLSG 2000 R a n d o m i z a t i o n 6 - 8 x CHOP + Ritux pts. > 60 yrs IFN-maintenance 6 - 8 x CHOP

  17. GLSG Studies 1996 and 2000Response Duration 12-03 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 CHOP + PBSCT’00 R-CHOP + PBSCT ’00 CHOP + PBSCT ’96 R-CHOP + IFN ’00 CHOP + IFN ’00 Probability CHOP + IFN ’96 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years after end of induction therapy December 2003

  18. GLSG Studies 1996 and 2000Response Duration 12-06 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 R-CHOP + PBSCT (81/94) R-CHOP + IFN (105/126) CHOP + PBSCT (95/137) Probability CHOP + IFN (48/160) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Years after end of induction therapy

  19. GLSG Studies 1996 and 2000Response Duration 08-08 R/ASCT ASCT R/IFN IFN 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Probability p<0.0001 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 Month after end of induction No. of patients at riskR/ASCT 116 97 76 52 39 26 7 0 ASCT 145 132 118 107 87 69 54 38 22 12 R/IFN 152 120 86 62 32 17 5 0 IFN 167 114 85 62 44 36 28 17 9 2

  20. CHOP vs. R-CHOP +/-PBSCT 1524 patients randomized 156 not randomized 13 MRD data 861 first randomization 433 randomized R-CHOP 428 randomized to CHOP 553 assigned to R-CHOP 411 treated CHOP 418 treated R-CHOP 436 treated R-CHOP 224 MRD data 172 R-CHOP 52 no treatment documented 100 MRD data 98 CHOP 2 no treatment documented 145 MRD data 142 R-CHOP 3 treated with CHOP 490 MRD data 327 R-CHOP 108 CHOP 54 no treatment documented

  21. p=0,0134 10 0 10 -1 10 -2 10 -3 MRD level 10 -4 10 -5 neg 74% 28% Diagnosis Induction 4 Induction 6 Induction 2 Quantitative t(14;18) AnalysisMRD levels at induction CHOP Induction p=0,0021 R-CHOP Induction p<0,0001 15% 28% 72%

  22. Remission Duration according to Consolidation(n=30, MRD negative after induction)

  23. Remission Duration according to Consolidation MRD neg. MRD pos. UK SH

  24. RiCHOP study 2009 for First-Line Therapy of FL Patients aged <65 Years R A N D O M I S A T I O N ASCT CR,PR 6 x CHOP + 8 x R Rituximab maintenance Rituximab maintenance CR,PR

  25. RiCHOP study 2009 for First-Line Therapy of FL Patients aged <65 Years Ultimate Goal : Cure by combining all proven effective treatment modalities • R-chemo for initial therapy • ASCT • R maintenance The Concept of „Total Therapy“

  26. Key Steps in Improving Treatment for Follicular Lymphoma Cure Prolongation of Life Palliation of Symptomes email@med.uni-muenchen.de

  27. GLSG Study Group Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe

More Related