html5-img
1 / 36

Public Awareness and Understanding of Health I nequalities in Ontario

Public Awareness and Understanding of Health I nequalities in Ontario. Ketan Shankardass , PhD Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University

sadie
Télécharger la présentation

Public Awareness and Understanding of Health I nequalities in Ontario

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Awareness and Understanding of Health Inequalities in Ontario KetanShankardass, PhD Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University Centre for Research on Inner City Health in the Keenan Research Centre of the Li KaShing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital November 30, 2012

  2. Outline • The link between public awareness and political will for health equity • Ontario public awareness of health inequalities • Implications for broadening awareness of SDoH in Ontario

  3. Health

  4. How broad is your health system? Health Social Determinants of Health Health Sector Health System Health Services (Adapted from World Bank, 2011)

  5. Need to strengthen chronic disease prevention, e.g., Diabetes in Ontario (Canadian Diabetes Association, 2010)

  6. Diabetic Ontarians tend to have lower income or education (Manuel and Schultz, 2003)

  7. Food insecurity is more common in lower income households in Ontario (POWER Study, 2010)

  8. Neighbourhood ‘activity-friendliness’ predicts diabetes in Toronto... …particularly among those with mid/low income (Booth et al, 2007)

  9. Why not broaden action on the social determinants of health? • Why not tackle the growing health and economic burden of diabetes and obesity – and reduce inequities in these outcomes – by supporting measures to ensure that all Ontarians have adequate: • Family income • Food security • Neighbourhood activity friendliness

  10. Political will as a key driver of action on the social determinants of health Problem stream Window of Opportunity to Act on SDoH Policy stream Political stream Public Awareness and Understanding as a Driver of Political Will (Kingdon, 1984)

  11. Public Opinion on Health Inequalities in Ontario • Telephone survey using random digit dialling • 2006 Ontarians aged 18 years and over • Survey conducted in 2010 fall/winter • The survey included questions pertaining to three broad themes: • awareness of health inequalities • attributions of the causes of health inequalities • opinions about solutions to health inequalities

  12. Public Awareness of Health Inequalities in Ontario • Respondents asked to agree/disagree with four statements about health inequalities in general and by income in Ontario: • In Ontario, all people are equally healthy and can expect to live for more or less the same amount of time • In Ontario, people who are rich are much healthier than those who are poor • In Ontario, people who are poor are less likely to live into their 80s than people who are rich • Over the last few years, people who are rich have become healthier while people who are poor have become less healthy

  13. Public Awareness of Health Inequalities in Ontario • In Ontario, all people are equally healthy and can expect to live for more or less the same amount of time • In Ontario, people who are rich are much healthier than those who are poor • In Ontario, people who are poor are less likely to live into their 80s than people who are rich • Over the last few years, people who are rich have become healthier while people who are poor have become less healthy 73% disagreed 53% agreed 64% agreed 11% 57% agreed (Shankardass et al 2012)

  14. The rich are less likely to suffer from... ~20% (Shankardass et al 2012)

  15. So what? • A small majority of Ontarians are aware of income-related health inequalities • 30% in a 2005 national study (CIHI 2005) • 82% in a 2004 study in Saskatoon (Lemstra et al 2007)

  16. So what? • Much lower awareness of income-related inequalities in specific health conditions • Even Ontarians who are generally aware have an incomplete understanding of the breadth of the issue

  17. So what? • There is a need for more “knowledge translation” of evidence outlining inequalities • Aim to: • Reduce the size of the core minority who remain unaware • Improve awareness about the variety of outcomes impacted • Which Ontarians to target? How to frame the issue to those groups?

  18. Younger Ontarians are less aware of income-related inequalities “The rich are much healthier than the poor” Relative Odds Compared to Youngest Age Group Age Group (Shankardass et al 2012)

  19. Females are less aware of income-related inequalities than males Relative Odds for Males (Shankardass et al 2012)

  20. Rural Ontarians are less aware of income-related inequalities Relative Odds for Urban Areas (Shankardass et al 2012)

  21. Ontarians with low educational attainment are less aware of income-related inequalities Relative Odds for High School Attainment (Shankardass et al 2012)

  22. Ontarians who don’t vote NDP or Liberal are less aware of income-related health inequalities Relative Odds for NDP Voters Relative Odds for Liberal Party Voters (Shankardass et al 2012)

  23. (Gollust et al 2009)

  24. “Right Choices” model for why there are health inequalities

  25. To move the public away from the “right choices” model: • Unequal health opportunities versus unequal outcomes • Explaining the role of external factors in clear and compelling ways • A clear and practical vision of how to solve the problems • Health as an exceptional case • Explaining the health gradient (“a grand challenge”)

  26. Attributions for income-related health inequalities among Ontarians (Lofters et al, unpublished)

  27. (Reutter et al 1999, as cited in Raphael 2012)

  28. Attributions for income-related health inequalities among Ontarians, by political affiliation (Lofters et al, unpublished)

  29. Moving the SDoH agenda forward In Ontario, we need to strengthen public awareness about income-related inequalities… • Generally and about specific outcomes • Particularly among Ontarians who are: • Younger • Female • Rural • With low educational attainment • Who vote Progressive Conservative • Focus on translating explanations related to: • Neighbourhoods and health • Accessibility of the health care system • Disempowering effect of low income

  30. THANK YOUQuestions?Comments?

  31. Structural determinants of health (Solar and Irwin, 2007)

  32. (The Ontario Educational Communications Authority, 2011)

  33. Health in All Policies as health promotion Advocate for political/economic/social/ cultural/environmental/biological/behavioural conditions favourable for health and equity • Continue to work on clearly and concisely articulating links amongst health determinants and health/equity outcomes • Build the case for a multisectoral approach, one sector at a time • Build public awareness and understanding of health determinants and “population health”

  34. Health in All Policies as health promotion Mediate the specific interests of actors in the pursuit of health and equity • E.g., Health Impact Assessment using “win-win approach” • Health diplomacy “to make the healthier choice the easier choice for policy makers” (Krech, 2011) • May involve trade-offs initially to foster durable relations with increasingly health-aware partners • Good cop-bad cop? The need for legislation to compel action, as needed

  35. Social marketing? • Considering a “social marketing” perspective can help think aboutmessaging that will resonate with specific under-aware subpopulations • Consumer-oriented marketing techniques have been used in the design, implementation and evaluation of health promotion aiming to influence behaviours • Incorporates the four “Ps” of marketing • Place – who are you trying to target? • Product – what are you trying to sell? • Price – how “costly” is buy-in? • Promotion – what approach will promote buy-in?

More Related