250 likes | 528 Vues
Biomass and Bioenergy. Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green. IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting - Ireland. 20 November 2003. University College Dublin. Introduction. What is biomass? Why calculate GHG benefits The Carbon Cycle Options for biomass
E N D
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting - Ireland 20 November 2003 University College Dublin
Introduction • What is biomass? • Why calculate GHG benefits • The Carbon Cycle • Options for biomass • How are GHG benefits calculated • Life Cycle Analysis • Case Studies
What is biomass? • Accumulates in living vegetation following photosynthesis • Important pool in the carbon cycle • Exists in many forms • Contributes to other pools within the global system
Contribution Emitted (source) Absorbed (sink) Burning fossil fuels 6.3 Land use change 1.6 Enhanced vegetation growth 3.0 Ocean-atmosphere exchange 1.7 Total 7.9 4.7 Balance 3.2 The Carbon Budget (Source: Broadmeadow and Matthews, 2003)
Greenhouse gas mitigation options • Fuel for Energy • Dedicated Sources (i.e. by-products of other activities) • Dependant Sources (i.e. energy crops grown specifically for food) • Carbon Sink • Wood Products
Fuel for Energy • Long use history (i.e. centuries) • Currently contributes 14% to the global energy requirements • More efficient use through modern technology • Solid liquid and gas • Capable of replacing all fossil fuel energy forms
Fuel for Energy (cont.) a. CO2 captured by growing crops and forests b.O2 released and C is stored in the biomass of plants c.C in harvested biomass is transported to the power station d.Released C from burning biomass is made available again. ‘Recycling of carbon’ Source: IEA Bioenergy Task 38
Carbon Sink • Recent Policy has focused on this option • Kyoto Protocol Article 3.3 • Increase carbon stock in various pools • Aboveground / belowground and soil • Time Dependant • Land use change
Managed as a carbon sink a. Establishment b. Full vigour c. Mature Phase d. Longterm equilibrium Managed as commercial forest Periodic felling indicated by arrows Over several rotations carbon stocks niether increase of decrease Accumulation balanced by removals for wood products, bioenergy etc Carbon Stock Dynamics
Wood Products • Product replacement • Sink • Fuel at end of life
Why calculate GHG benefits • Analyse potential • Quantify benefits • Compare options • Quality decision
Life cycle analysis considerations • Carbon stock dynamics • Trade-offs and synergies • Leakage • Permanence • Emissions factors • By-products • Efficiency • Upstream/downstream emissions Task 38 standard methodology for calculating GHG emissions Source: IEA Bioenergy Task 38 • Other greenhouse gases
Constraints Must compare systems within same system boundary • Information (data) sources • Boundary selection • Restricted analysis Task 38 standard methodology for calculating GHG emissions Source: IEA Bioenergy Task 38
Bioenergy Case Study 1 GORCAM output Source: IEA Task 38
Bioenergy Case Study 2a Ethanol production in Brazil vs United States Potential CO2 emissions avoided • Brazil 5.6 MtC/yr • United States 0.59 MtC/yr • Source: Kheshgi and Marland, 2000
Bioenergy • Bioenergy output to fossil energy input • Forestry and agriculture (25-50 : 1) • Liquid energy (4-5 : 1) Source: Marland, 1999
0,62 natural gas power plant with gas and steam turbine N2O 16,4 wood chips power plant with steam turbine 44,9 CH4 Greenhouse gas 0,307 413 CO2 34,5 459 CO2-eq 51,1 0 100 200 300 400 500 Greenhouse gas emission factor [g CO2-eq. kWh electricity-1] Bioenergy Case Study 2b Austria: Fuel cycle analysis of Power plants Source: Jungmeier et al, 1999
Sink Source Canada: Total Forest Ecosystem Carbon Modelling (1920 - 1995) Case Studies - Sink Source: Kurz and Apps, 1999
Case Study - Sink Typical radiata pine regime New Zealand:Long-term average carbon density Source: IEA Task 38, 2003
Case Study – Wood Products • 1 kilometre of transmission line • Life 60 years • Including disposal Product Replacement Emission in tonnes of CO2 equivalent to construct Source: Matthews and Robertson, 2002
Case Study – Wood Products Canada:Forest Products Carbon Storage Source: IEA Task 38, 2003
Preferential Use Source: Matthews and Robertson, 2002