1 / 43

Daniel F. Lindley, President The Northern Trust Company of Delaware 302-428-8704 dfl2@ntrs

Delaware: Still Expanding the Boundaries. Daniel F. Lindley, President The Northern Trust Company of Delaware 302-428-8704 dfl2@ntrs.com. Delaware Jeopardy.

sage
Télécharger la présentation

Daniel F. Lindley, President The Northern Trust Company of Delaware 302-428-8704 dfl2@ntrs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Delaware: Still Expanding the Boundaries Daniel F. Lindley, President The Northern Trust Company of Delaware 302-428-8704 dfl2@ntrs.com

  2. Delaware Jeopardy Dating to 1682, from a deed to William Penn from the Duke of York, it separates Delaware from Pennsylvania and represents the only territorial border in the U.S. that is a true arc.

  3. Delaware Jeopardy What is the Twelve-Mile Circle?

  4. The Delaware Advantages • Wealth Enhancement with Dynasty Trusts • Savings on State Fiduciary Income Taxes • Administrative Trusts with Third-Party Advisors • Asset Protection through Self-Settled Trusts • Freedom of Disposition

  5. Dynasty Trusts

  6. Dynasty Trusts: the Effect • In 1995 Delaware repealed its Rule against Perpetuities for personal property held in trust. • Without RAP, a Delaware “dynasty” trust can continue for countless generations. • Assets transferred to a GST-exempt dynasty trust can benefit each successive generation of the grantor’s descendants without incurring any additional gift tax, estate tax or generation-skipping transfer tax.

  7. Dynastic Purpose Trusts • The dynasty format is useful for so-called “purpose” trusts. • Based on 12 Del. C. § 3556, a purpose trust is a non-charitable trust with no readily identifiable person as a beneficiary. • A person appointed by the trust or by the Court of Chancery may enforce the trust. • Upon termination, the assets are distributable to designated beneficiaries or under the terms of the grantor’s will.

  8. Dynastic Purpose Trusts • Avoid taxable gift at inception by funding the purpose trust with a GRAT or CLAT remainder. • Grantor or non-grantor trust treatment of income should be available during the grantor’s lifetime. • Powers of trust advisors should be limited to avoid estate inclusion. • At termination, GST consequences if the assets revert to the benefit of individual family members.

  9. Delaware: Tax-Free Shopping (and Tax-Free Trusts)

  10. Tax-Free Shopping (and Tax-Free Trusts)

  11. Fiduciary Income Tax Savings • Delaware does not impose a fiduciary income tax on irrevocable trusts for non-resident beneficiaries. • Absent a taxable connection or “nexus” with another state, capital gains and ordinary income can accumulate in irrevocable Delaware trusts without incurring a state income tax.

  12. Using a DING Trust to Avoid State Income Tax • A grantor can contribute highly-appreciated assets to a Delaware asset protection trust to avoid paying state income tax to the grantor’s state of residence. • To qualify for non-grantor treatment, the trust must have an “adverse party” – usually a Distribution Committee ― with the authority to approve distributions to the grantor or the grantor’s spouse.

  13. Using a DING Trust to Avoid State Income Tax • To avoid a completed gift on funding the trust, the grantor should retain a limited power of appointment. • The Service has issued multiple PLRs supporting the non-grantor, incomplete gift nature of this sort of trust. PLR 200729025, 200731019, 200715005, 200647001, 200637025, 200612002, 200502014, 200247013 and 200148028. • In a 7/07 notice, the Service asked for comment whether members of the Distribution Committee hold a general power of appointment.

  14. Potential Tax Savings with a DING • NYC resident owns $50MM of zero-basis stock in a closely-held corporation. Client plans to sell to a private equity firm for cash. Post-sale Value of Asset Delaware Trust = $42,500,000 New York Personal Assets = 37,251,000 Delaware Benefit = $ 5,249,000 Assumptions: Federal capital gains rate: 15.0%; NY state and city income tax rate: 10.498%; DE state fiduciary income tax rate: 0%. Actual results may vary from the illustration.

  15. Administrative Trusts

  16. Administrative Trusts • Delaware law allows trustees to take direction from advisors (including investment and distribution advisors), without liability for their decisions or results. • Administrative trusts represent a bifurcation of the trustee’s duties, not a delegation under the Uniform Prudent Investor Act.

  17. Client Suitability • Non-U.S. grantors who want to maintain a trust with a U.S. trustee but want the trust treated as a foreign trust for U.S. income tax purposes. By giving a non-U.S. person authority over substantial decisions involving a trust, the trust will fail the “control” test and qualify as a foreign trust (absent U.S. source income).

  18. Client Suitability • Non-U.S. grantors who want to create an irrevocable perpetual trust, for the benefit of U.S. beneficiaries, that is not subject to U.S. transfer taxes. In contrast with many offshore jurisdictions, which equate excessive settlor control with a “sham” trust, a direction trust legitimizes a settlor’s investment authority.

  19. Asset Protection Trusts

  20. Asset Protection Trusts • In 1997 Delaware became the second state to permit an “asset protection” trust, a trust in which the grantor retains an interest as a beneficiary. • Currently, eleven states permit asset protection trusts in some fashion: Delaware, Alaska, Rhode Island, Nevada, Utah, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Wyoming and New Hampshire.

  21. Asset Protection Trusts • With a properly structured Delaware asset protection trust, the grantor may be a beneficiary of the trust and retain certain powers over the trust. • A creditor of the grantor will not be able to reach the trust assets unless its claim is filed within the applicable tail period and it establishes that the funding of the trust was a fraudulent transfer.

  22. Asset Protection Trusts • A “future creditor” can prevail only by showing, with clear and convincing evidence, that the grantor actually intended to defraud that particular creditor by making a transfer of assets to the trust. • A beneficiary’s discretionary interest in a trust is not an enforceable property right and is not subject to compulsory distributions in favor of a creditor.

  23. Exempt Claims Can Reach Trust • A spouse or child with claims for alimony, support or a share of marital property is not subject to the tail period and does not have to prove a fraudulent transfer. • A “spouse” does not include one who marries the grantor after the transfer to the trust.

  24. The Problem

  25. The Solution To Avoid

  26. Premarital Planning Options • Leave it to chance (and the judicial system) • Use a revocable living trust • Negotiate a prenuptial agreement • Create a domestic asset protection trust

  27. DE APT A DE trust is unilateral in nature, with the client working out the details of the trust with counsel. PRENUPTIAL K A prenup requires the cooperation of both parties and their counsel to negotiate a host of delicate issues. Absence of independent counsel can render an agreement involuntary. Planning Considerations: The Context

  28. DE APT The client need not disclose the existence of the APT or provide a schedule of pre-marital assets. PRENUPTIAL K Fair, reasonable and full disclosure of all assets is essential to validity of the agreement. Planning Considerations: Disclosure

  29. DE APT Without the need to disclose the existence of the trust, the client avoids the risk of an emotional discussion with the client’s fiancé. PRENUPTIAL K Discussions of prenuptial agreements are often fraught with risk to the relationship, and may engender distrust and hostility. Planning Considerations: Emotional Aspects

  30. Planning Considerations: Lifestyle Issues

  31. DE APT A trust provides protection for premarital assets without delving into a host of unrelated social issues. PRENUPTIAL K It is not unusual for a prenup to encompass lifestyle issues such as parenting obligations, use of last names, relations with in-laws, birth control (or not), and other assorted areas of contention. Planning Considerations: Lifestyle Issues

  32. DE APT Under Delaware law, a trust is not subject to a spouse’s claims for an elective share or forced heirship. 12 Del. C. § 3573. PRENUPTIAL K Unless an agreement specifically excludes a spouse’s elective share, the estate of a deceased client remains subject to spousal claims, potentially up to 50% of decedent’s estate. Planning Consideration: Estate Issues

  33. DE APT A premarital APT is subject only to a claim that the grantor actually intended to defraud his or her future spouse. PRENUPTIAL K A prenup can be challenged if it was involuntary (duress, fraud, undue influence or lack of capacity), unconscionable or lacking in meaningful financial disclosure. Enforcement: Bases for Challenge

  34. DE APT A premarital APT is subject to challenge only during the four-year tail period. PRENUPTIAL K A prenup will remain vulnerable to challenge throughout the marriage. State law often tolls the statute of limitations. One party may seek a sunset clause to terminate the prenup after, say, 5 years of marriage. Enforcement: Duration of the Solution

  35. Freedom of Disposition

  36. Freedom of Disposition: Confidentiality

  37. Freedom of Disposition: Confidentiality • Delaware trusts are not subject to any public registration or filing requirements. • In the event of litigation, the Court of Chancery routinely seals the record of trust proceedings. • Delaware law even permits a trustee to withhold knowledge of a trust’s existence from future or discretionary beneficiaries, if the grantor so directs. 12 Del. C. § 3303(a).

  38. Freedom of Disposition • Enforcement of in terrorem clauses: 12 Del. C. § 3329. Beneficiary must “substantially prevail” to avoid disqualifying effect. • Decanting Existing Trusts: 12 Del. C. § 3528. Using discretionary power to distribute principal into a follow-on trust for the benefit of one or more “proper objects.”

  39. Decanting Trusts • Dividing an existing trust into separate trusts to preserve NOLs that the trust’s primary asset would have had to forfeit. • Eliminating mandatory principal distributions with a trust whose value had grown unexpectedly large. • Eliminating an estranged daughter’s eligibility as a potential taker after the income beneficiary’s death.

  40. Concluding Thoughts

  41. Other Jurisdictions (AK? NV? SD?) • In contrast to the judicial system in other states, Delaware has a separate court of equity, a non-jury court, with exclusive jurisdiction over trust matters. • The Delaware General Assembly revises Delaware’s trust laws annually to ensure that they remain effective and flexible.

  42. Profile of Delaware Office • The Delaware office opened September 30, 2004 as a trust office of Northern Trust Bank, FSB. • Since 1/1/06 Northern’s Delaware office has operated as a Delaware limited purpose trust company – The Northern Trust Company of Delaware. • As of June 30, 2008, the Delaware office held in excess of $4.3 billion in assets under administration.

  43. Thank You Delaware: Still Expanding the Boundaries

More Related