1 / 18

Human-Computer Interaction

Human-Computer Interaction. Usability Specifications. Lecture Overview. Definition and purpose Usability factors Measuring instruments Usability specification process Setting usability levels Advantages and disadvantages. ISO 9241 Usability Definition (1990).

sagira
Télécharger la présentation

Human-Computer Interaction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Human-Computer Interaction Usability Specifications

  2. Lecture Overview • Definition and purpose • Usability factors • Measuring instruments • Usability specification process • Setting usability levels • Advantages and disadvantages

  3. ISO 9241 Usability Definition (1990) ‘‘The effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction with which specified users can achieve specified goals in a particular environment.”

  4. Functional and Usability Specifications • Functional specifications are central to ensuring system functionality • Usability specifications are central to ensuring system usability

  5. Purpose of Setting Usability Specifications • Establish when an interface is ‘good enough’ • When to stop iteration

  6. Common Usability Factors • Speed of operation • Completion rate • Error free rate • Satisfaction rating • Learnability • Retainability • Advanced feature usage Main software usability measures identified by IBM

  7. Time Dimension for Usability Factors • Initial performance • Long-term performance • First impression • Long-term user satisfaction

  8. Measuring Instrument • Method for providing values for a particular usability factor • Always quantitative (i.e. numerically measured) • Objective • Observable user performance • Often associated with a benchmark test - involves typical (normally simple and frequent) task a user will perform • Subjective • User opinion • Usually associated with a user questionnaire • Objective and subjective measures are equally important

  9. Usability Specification Process • Defining usability through metrics • Setting and agreeing planned levels of metrics • Analysing impact of design solutions • Incorporating user-derived feedback • Iterating until planned levels are achieved

  10. Usability Specification Process • Defining usability through metrics • Setting and agreeing planned levels of metrics • Analysing impact of design solutions • Incorporating user-derived feedback • Iterating until planned levels are achieved Usability levels become part, first of the requirements document, then of the system specification

  11. Sample Rows from a Usability Specification Table for DTP Package

  12. Electronic Mail: Example Benchmark Tasks • Set up parameters for two terminals (ADM3/VT100) • Set up auto-dial and auto-login • Initiate dial-up and login • Start on-line usage • Send and receive a file • Set slave printer on/off • Set up present unattended dial up/login/file transfer • Read received file • Leave the system Note: Each task would be specified in precise detail to ensure all participants attempt exactly the same task

  13. Setting Levels for Usability • Restrict to major / critical issues • Method: guesses agreed by a team • e.g. user interaction designer, user interface software developer, marketing person, project manager • Generates team commitment to usability targets • Initial performance and first impression are almost always appropriate

  14. Current and Worst Acceptable Levels • Current Level • Present level of value to be measured • Possible even from manual system or initial prototype • May be related to a competitive system • Worst Acceptable Level • Worst acceptable, NOT worst possible • Eventually, if any observed value on any attribute does not meet this level, the system is formally unacceptable • Level should equal or better current level (except for initial performance - slower and error prone - make an educated guess)

  15. Planned Target and Best Possible Levels • Planned Target Level • The ‘what you would like’ level • Attributes not yet at this level focus development effort • Set higher than current level (if known) • Match or exceed competitor’s product • Best Possible Level • Realistic state-of-the-art upper limit • Indicates room for future improvement • Assumes expert user, best design, best available technology

  16. Advantages of Usability Specifications • Part of the management and control mechanisms for the iterative refinement process • Define a quantitative end to the (potentially endless) iterative refinement process • Allows clear assessment of usability during iterative prototyping cycles • Identifies data to be collected, avoids gathering unusable or irrelevant data • Objectively identifies interface weaknesses which need further design effort

  17. Disadvantages of Usability Specifications • Measures of specific user actions in specific situations • No reliable technique for setting usability specifications • Different tasks and user groups may need different usability specifications

  18. Lecture Review • Definition and purpose • Usability factors • Measuring instruments • Usability specification process • Setting usability levels • Advantages and disadvantages

More Related