730 likes | 1.36k Vues
School of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne Noise in Communication Systems Prof. Rolando Carrasco Lecture Notes Newcastle University 2008/2009. Introduction Thermal Noise Shot Noise Low Frequency or Flicker Noise Excess Resister Noise
E N D
School of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne Noise in Communication Systems Prof. Rolando Carrasco Lecture Notes Newcastle University 2008/2009
Introduction • Thermal Noise • Shot Noise • Low Frequency or Flicker Noise • Excess Resister Noise • Burst or Popcorn Noise • General Comments • Noise Evaluation – Overview • Analysis of Noise in Communication Systems • Thermal Noise • Noise Voltage Spectral Density • Resistors in Series • Resistors in Parallel • Matched Communication Systems Noise in Communication Systems 11. Signal - to – Noise 12. Noise Factor – Noise Figure 13. Noise Figure / Factor for Active Elements 14. Noise Temperature 15. Noise Figure / Factors for Passive Elements 16. Review – Noise Factor / Figure / Temperature 17. Cascaded Networks 18. System Noise Figure 19. System Noise Temperature 20. Algebraic Representation of Noise 21. Additive White Gaussian Noise
1. Introduction • Noise is a general term which is used to describe an unwanted signal which affects a wanted signal. These unwanted signals arise from a variety of sources which may be considered in one of two main categories:- • Interference, usually from a human source (man made) • Naturally occurring random noise • Interference • Interference arises for example, from other communication systems (cross talk), 50 Hz supplies (hum) and harmonics, switched mode power supplies, thyristor circuits, ignition (car spark plugs) motors … etc.
Natural Noise Naturally occurring external noise sources include atmosphere disturbance (e.g. electric storms, lighting, ionospheric effect etc), so called ‘Sky Noise’ or Cosmic noise which includes noise from galaxy, solar noise and ‘hot spot’ due to oxygen and water vapour resonance in the earth’s atmosphere. 1. Introduction (Cont’d)
This type of noise is generated by all resistances (e.g. a resistor, semiconductor, the resistance of a resonant circuit, i.e. the real part of the impedance, cable etc). 2. Thermal Noise (Johnson Noise) Experimental results (by Johnson) and theoretical studies (by Nyquist) give the mean square noise voltage as Where k = Boltzmann’s constant = 1.38 x 10-23 Joules per K T = absolute temperature B = bandwidth noise measured in (Hz) R = resistance (ohms)
The law relating noise power, N, to the temperature and bandwidth is N = k TB watts Thermal noise is often referred to as ‘white noise’ because it has a uniform ‘spectral density’. 2. Thermal Noise (Johnson Noise) (Cont’d)
3. Shot Noise • Shot noise was originally used to describe noise due to random fluctuations in electron emission from cathodes in vacuum tubes (called shot noise by analogy with lead shot). • Shot noise also occurs in semiconductors due to the liberation of charge carriers. • For pn junctions the mean square shot noise current is • Where • is the direct current as the pn junction (amps) • is the reverse saturation current (amps) • is the electron charge = 1.6 x 10-19 coulombs • B is the effective noise bandwidth (Hz) • Shot noise is found to have a uniform spectral density as for thermal noise
Active devices, integrated circuit, diodes, transistors etc also exhibits a low frequency noise, which is frequency dependent (i.e. non uniform) known as flicker noise or ‘one – over – f’ noise. 4. Low Frequency or Flicker Noise 5. Excess Resistor Noise Thermal noise in resistors does not vary with frequency, as previously noted, by many resistors also generates as additional frequency dependent noise referred to as excess noise. 6. Burst Noise or Popcorn Noise Some semiconductors also produce burst or popcorn noise with a spectral density which is proportional to
7. General Comments For frequencies below a few KHz (low frequency systems), flicker and popcorn noise are the most significant, but these may be ignored at higher frequencies where ‘white’ noise predominates.
The essence of calculations and measurements is to determine the signal power to Noise power ratio, i.e. the (S/N) ratio or (S/N) expression in dB. 8. Noise Evaluation
8. Noise Evaluation (Cont’d) The probability of amplitude of noise at any frequency or in any band of frequencies (e.g. 1 Hz, 10Hz… 100 KHz .etc) is a Gaussian distribution.
Noise may be quantified in terms of noise power spectral density, po watts per Hz, from which Noise power N may be expressed as N= po Bn watts 8. Noise Evaluation (Cont’d) Ideal low pass filter Bandwidth B Hz = Bn N= po Bn watts Practical LPF 3 dB bandwidth shown, but noise does not suddenly cease at B3dB Therefore, Bn > B3dB, Bn depends on actual filter. N= p0 Bn In general the equivalent noise bandwidth is > B3dB.
Thermal Noise (Johnson noise) 9. Analysis of Noise In Communication Systems This thermal noise may be represented by an equivalent circuit as shown below (mean square value , power) then VRMS = i.e. Vn is the RMS noise voltage. A) System BW = B Hz N= Constant B (watts) = KB B) System BW N= Constant 2B (watts) = K2B For B, For A,
Resistors in Series 9. Analysis of Noise In Communication Systems (Cont’d) Assume that R1 at temperature T1 and R2 at temperature T2, then i.e. The resistor in series at same temperature behave as a single resistor
9. Analysis of Noise In Communication Systems (Cont’d) Resistance in Parallel
In communication systems we are usually concerned with the noise (i.e. S/N) at the receiver end of the system. 10. Matched Communication Systems The transmission path may be for example:- Or An equivalent circuit, when the line is connected to the receiver is shown below.
The signal to noise ratio is given by 11. Signal to Noise The signal to noise in dB is expressed by for S and N measured in mW. 12. Noise Factor- Noise Figure Consider the network shown below,
12. Noise Factor- Noise Figure (Cont’d) • The amount of noise added by the network is embodied in the Noise Factor F, which is defined by • Noise factor F = • F equals to 1 for noiseless network and in general F > 1. The noise figure in the noise factor quoted in dB • i.e. Noise Figure F dB = 10 log10 F F ≥ 0 dB • The noise figure / factor is the measure of how much a network degrades the (S/N)IN, the lower the value of F, the better the network.
For active elements with power gain G>1, we have 13. Noise Figure – Noise Factor for Active Elements F = = But Therefore Since in general F v> 1 , then is increased by noise due to the active element i.e. Na represents ‘added’ noise measured at the output. This added noise may be referred to the input as extra noise, i.e. as equivalent diagram is
13. Noise Figure – Noise Factor for Active Elements (Cont’d) Ne is extra noise due to active elements referred to the input; the element is thus effectively noiseless.
A receiver systems usually consists of a number of passive or active elements connected in series. A typical receiver block diagram is shown below, with example 17. Cascaded Network In order to determine the (S/N) at the input, the overall receiver noise figure or noise temperature must be determined. In order to do this all the noise must be referred to the same point in the receiver, for example to A, the feeder input or B, the input to the first amplifier. or is the noise referred to the input.
Assume that a system comprises the elements shown below, 18. System Noise Figure Assume that these are now cascaded and connected to an aerial at the input, with from the aerial. Now , Since similarly
18. System Noise Figure (Cont’d) The overall system Noise Factor is The equation is called FRIIS Formula.
Phasor Representation of Signal and Noise 20. Algebraic Representation of Noise The general carrier signal VcCosWct may be represented as a phasor at any instant in time as shown below: If we now consider a carrier with a noise voltage with “peak” value superimposed we may represents this as: Both Vn and n are random variables, the above phasor diagram represents a snapshot at some instant in time.
We may draw, for a single instant, the phasor with noise resolved into 2 components, which are: • x(t) in phase with the carriers 20. Algebraic Representation of Noise (Cont’d) b) y(t) in quadrature with the carrier
Considering the general phasor representation below:- 20. Algebraic Representation of Noise (Cont’d)
20. Algebraic Representation of Noise (Cont’d) From the diagram
Additive 21. Additive White Gaussian Noise Noise is usually additive in that it adds to the information bearing signal. A model of the received signal with additive noise is shown below White White noise = = Constant Gaussian We generally assume that noise voltage amplitudes have a Gaussian or Normal distribution.
School of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne Error Control Coding Prof. Rolando Carrasco Lecture Notes University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne 2005
Error Control Coding • In digital communication error occurs due to noise • Bit error rate = • Error rates typically range from 10-1 to 10-5 or better • In order to counteract the effect of errors Error Control Coding is used. • a) Detect Error – Error Detection • b) Correct Error – Error Correction
Block Codes • A block code is a coding technique which generates C check bits for M message bits to give a stand alone block of M+C= N bits • The code rate is given by • Rate = • A single parity bit (C=1 bit) applied to a block of 7 bits give a code rate • Rate =
Block Codes (Cont’d) • A (7,4) Cyclic code has N=7, M=4 • Code rate R = A repetition-m code in which each bit or message is transmitted m times and the receiver carries out a majority vote on each bit has a code rate
Message Transfer It is required to transfer the contents of Computer A to Computer B. COMPUTER A COMPUTER B • The messages transferred to the Computer B, some may be rejected (lost) and some will be accepted, and will be either true (successful transfer) or false • Obviously the requirement is for a high probability of successful transfer (ideally = 1), low probability of false transfer (ideally = 0) and a low probability of lost messages.
Message Transfer (Cont’d) Error control coding may be considered further in two main ways • In terms of System Performance i.e. the probabilities of successful, false and lost message transfer. We need to know error correcting /detection ability to detect and correct errors (depends on hamming distance). • 2. In terms of the Error Control Code itself i.e. the structure, operation, characteristics and implementation of various types of codes.
System Performance • In order to determine system performance in terms of successful, false and lost message transfers it is necessary to know: • the probability of error or b.e.r p. • the no. of bits in the message block N • the ability of the code to detect/ correct errors, usually expressed as a minimum Hamming distance, dmin for the code This gives the probability of R errors in an N bit block subject to a bit error rate p.
System Performance (Cont’d) Hence, for an N bit block we can determine the probability of no errors in the block (R=0) i.e. • An error free block • The probability of 1 error in the block (R=1) • The probability of 2 error in the block (R=2)
Minimum Hamming distance • A parameter which indicates the worst case ability of the code to detect /correct errors. Let dmin = minimum Hamming distance l = number of bits errors detected t = number of bit errors corrected dmin= l + t + 1 with t ≤l For example, suppose a code has a dmin = 6. We have as options 1) 6= 5 + 0 + 1 {detect up to 5 errors , no correction} 2) 6= 4 + 1 + 1 {detect up to 4 errors , correct 1 error} 3) 6= 3 + 2 + 1 {detect up to 3 errors , correct 2 error}
Minimum Hamming distance (Cont’d) • For option 3 for example, if 4 or more errors occurred, these would not be detected and these messages would be accepted but would be false messages. • Fortunately, the higher the no. of errors, the less the probability they will occur for reasonable values of p. Messages transfers are successful if no errors occurs or if t errors occurs which are corrected. i.e. Probability of Success = Messages transfers are lost if up to l errors are detected which are not corrected, i.e Probability of lost = p(t+1) + p(t+2)+ …. p(l) =
Minimum Hamming distance (Cont’d) Message transfers are false of l+1 or more errors occurs Probability of false = p(l+1) + p(l+2)+ …. p(N) = Example Using dmin = 6, option 3, (t =1, l =4) Probability of Successful transfer = p(0) + p(1) Probability of lost messages = p(2) + p(3) + p(4) Probability of false messages = p(5) + p(6)+ …….+ p(N)