1 / 9

Why empty strings?

A bit like zero you may think you can do without but it makes definitions & calculations easier Definitions: An alphabeth is a finite set of symbols assume  is not a symbol u is a string over an alphabet T iff u consists of only symbols in T Hence  is a string over any T

salaam
Télécharger la présentation

Why empty strings?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A bit like zero you may think you can do without but it makes definitions & calculations easier Definitions: An alphabeth is a finite set of symbols assume  is not a symbol u is a string over an alphabet T iff u consists of only symbols in T Hence  is a string over any T  allows us to define certain things more elegantly Example: the notions “substring”, “prefix”, etc: Why empty strings?

  2. Definitions (from first lecture) • A string u is a substring of w if there exist other • strings x & y s.t. w = xuy. • bab is a substring of babba. • If u is a substring of w, and x above is , then u • is a prefix of w. • If uw, then u is a proper prefix. • ba is a prefix of babba. • If u is a substring of w, and y above is , then u • is a suffix of w. • If uw, then u is a proper suffix. • bba is a suffix of babba.

  3. for any string u, u=u=u it follows that === ... some properties

  4. for any string u, u=u=u it follows that === ... some properties

  5. We could easily have defined FSAs in such a way that  edges don’t exist Yet, our definition allowed FSAs to contain  edges We did this by allowing such moves explicitly:  edges

  6. FSA: Formal Definition • A Finite State Automaton (FSA) is a 5-tuple (Q, I, F, T, E) where: • Q = states = a finite set; • I = initial states = a nonempty subset of Q; • F = final states = a subset of Q; • T = an alphabet; • E = edges = a subset of Q (T + ) Q. FSA = labelled, directed graph = set of nodes (some final/initial) + directed arcs (arrows) between nodes + each arc has a label from the alphabet. a Example: formal definition of A1 Q = {1, 2, 3, 4} I = {1} F = {4} T = {a, b} E = { (1,a,2), (1,b,4), (2,a,3), (2,b,4), (3,a,3), (3,b,3), (4,a,2), (4,b,4) } a,b 2 3 a b 1 a A1 b 4 b

  7. Recall a string is accepted by an FSA iff the string is the label of a path from initial to final node Example: this NDFSA accepts the string 01 and the string 001. After reading the first 0, the FSA can either read a 0 or a λ implications for strings accepted by FSA  1 j k f i 0 0 1 m

  8. Sometimes we want to prove things like “Every so-and-so language can be accepted by an FSA” One often proves such things by showing how FSAs can actually be constructed The resulting FSAs often contain  edges Example: proof that every Regular Expression has an equivalent FSA. usefulness of  edges in FSAa

More Related