1 / 39

High Stakes Testing and African American Learners: Raising the Bar or Barring the Raise?

High Stakes Testing and African American Learners: Raising the Bar or Barring the Raise?. Brenda L. (Townsend) Walker, Ph.D., J.D. Professor University of South Florida 974-1385 brendawalker@usf.edu. ADVANCE ORGANIZER. Rationale Seven Year Itch--NCLBA of 2001 and Academic Achievement

salali
Télécharger la présentation

High Stakes Testing and African American Learners: Raising the Bar or Barring the Raise?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High Stakes Testing and African American Learners: Raising the Bar or Barring the Raise? Brenda L. (Townsend) Walker, Ph.D., J.D. Professor University of South Florida 974-1385 brendawalker@usf.edu

  2. ADVANCE ORGANIZER Rationale Seven Year Itch--NCLBA of 2001 and Academic Achievement National and Florida trends Focus Group Responses Recommendations for Equitable Accountability and Achievement

  3. Intent of NCLBA of 2001 Close Achievement Gaps Seven to ten years of data High Pressure, High Stakes Testing Barriers to Achievement The New Majority Implications for Teacher Educators Rationale

  4. Purpose: To show what students know and can do Scaled scores (0-500) Three Levels Basic: partial mastery of knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work Proficient: solid academic performance that demonstrates competency over challenging subject matter Advanced: superior performance. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Trends

  5. NAEP TRENDS BY RACE

  6. NAEP MATH 4th Grade

  7. NAEP 4th Gr. Reading

  8. 2007 NAEP Reporting Groups in FL4th Grade Reading

  9. 2007 NAEP Reporting Groups in FL8th Grade Reading

  10. 2007 NAEP Reporting Groups in FL4th Grade Math

  11. 2007 NAEP Reporting Groups in FL8th Grade Math

  12. Hillsborough County, FL4th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  13. Pinellas County, FL4th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  14. Polk County, FL4th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  15. Sarasota County, FL4th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  16. Manatee County, FL4th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  17. Hillsborough County, FL 5th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  18. Manatee County, FL5th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  19. Pinellas County, FL5th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  20. Polk County, FL5th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  21. Sarasota County, FL5th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  22. Hillsborough County, FL6th grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  23. Manatee County, FL6th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  24. Pinellas County, FL6th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  25. Polk County, FL6th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  26. Sarasota County, FL6th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  27. Manatee, FL8th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  28. Hillsborough County, FL8th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  29. Pinellas County, FL8th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  30. Polk County, FL8th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  31. Sarasota County, FL8th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  32. Hillsborough County, FL10th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  33. Manatee County, FL10th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  34. Pinellas County, FL10th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  35. Polk County, FL10th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  36. Sarasota County, FL10th Grade Reading % >=3 on FCAT

  37. Focus Group Responses • 3 Groups of African American males with juvenile records • Ages 13-18 • Dropped out in middle or high schools • Perception of Schooling Themes • Alienation from academic process • Alienation from social process • Disconnected from teachers • Desire for school privileges

  38. Recommendations for Equitable Accountability and Achievement • Consistent federal and state assessments and benchmarks • Vigilant self-monitoring of unintended consequences • Disaggregate the disaggregated data • Intersection of race and gender • Sustained teacher and administration professional development • Social justice • Avoid competing practices • Low-performing v. high-performing strategies • Students viewed as testing liabilities v. assets • Encouraging drop-outs to raise test scores

  39. Recommendations • Nonpunitive supports for struggling learners • Culturally-responsive teaching, leadership. and management systems • Self-critique • Identify attributes, skills, strengths, talents, interests • Incorporate in teaching and communication • Solicit socially-valid input and feedback

More Related