Attitude Formation and Change

1. Attitude Formation and Change

2. What is an attitude? • A learned predisposition to respond to an object or a class of objects in a consistently favorable or unfavorable way. • Attitudes are relatively enduring. • Attitudes are situation-related.

3. Functions of Attitudes • Utilitarian function • Ego-defensive function • Knowledge function • Value-expressive function

4. How do we form attitudes? • Three different paths to attitude formation: • Attitudes are created by first creating beliefs. • Consumer beliefs are the knowledge that a consumer has about objects, their attributes, and the benefits provided by the objects. • Consumer beliefs are created by processing information--cognitive learning.

5. Forming Attitudes, continued • Attitudes are created directly. • Behavioral learning • Mere exposure • Attitudes are created by first creating behaviors. • Consumers respond to strong situational or environmental forces, and after engaging in the behavior, form attitudes about the experience.

6. Structural Model of Attitude • Tricomponent Attitude Model

7. Tricomponent Model • Cognitive component • The knowledge and perceptions that are acquired by a combination of direct experience with the attitude object and related information from various sources. • Affective component • The emotions or feelings associate with a particular product or brand. • Conative component • The likelihood or tendency that an individual will undertake a specific action or behave in a particular way with regard to the attitude object.

8. Measurement Models of Attitude • Multiattribute model • Fishbein and Azjen • Measures attitude score using consumers’ beliefs and evaluations about attributes of the attitude object. • Several different contexts in which attitude scores are measured. • Attitude-toward-the-object model • Attitude-toward-the-behavior model

9. Multiattribute Model Aj = ∑BijIi Where: i = attribute or product characteristic j= brand Such that: A = the consumer’s attitude score for brand j I = the importance weight given to attribute i by the consumer B = the consumer’s belief as to the extent to which a satisfactory level of attribute i is offered by brand j

10. Understanding the Multiattribute Model • All relevant product attributes, based on consumers’ perceptions, need to be included in the model to provide dimensionality. • Even though there may be several relevant attributes, they are not generally equally important. The importance weight of the formula allows adjustment of the importance of each attribute individually.

11. Understanding the Multiattribute Model... • Beliefs represent the extent to which each product offers satisfaction for the attribute in question. • Compensatory model.

12. Advantages of Multiattribute Model • Clearly shows what is important to consumers about a given product. • Shows how well brands do relative to each other. • Shows how well a specific brand does with respect to attributes perceived as important to consumers.

13. Weakness of Multiattribute Model • Not a perfect predictor of consumer behavior • Lots of variables determine behavior in addition to attitude: • Involvement • Friends • Family • Financial resources • Availability of product

14. Theory of Reasoned Action • Extends multiattribute model; tries to compensate for the inability of the multiattribute model to predict behavior. • Assumes that consumers consciously consider the consequences of alternative behaviors under consideration and choose the one that leads to the most desirable consequences. • The outcomes of this reasoned choice process is an intention to engage in a selected behavior--behavioral intention.

15. Theory of Reasoned Action B~BI = Aact(w1) + SN(w2) Where: B = a specific behavior BI = consumer’s intention to engage in that behavior Aact = consumer’s attitude toward engaging in that behavior SN = subjective norm regarding whether other people want the consumer to engage in that behavior w1 & w2 = weights that reflect the relative influence of the Aact and SN components on BI

16. Simplified Version Beliefs that the behavior leads to certain outcomes Evaluation of the outcomes Beliefs that specific referents think I should or should not perform the behavior Motivation to comply with the specific referents Attitude toward the behavior Subjective Norm Intention Behavior

17. Comparing A vs. Aact

18. Attitude-toward-the-Ad Model • Very specific to understanding the impact of advertising on consumer attitudes about a particular product or brand. • Exposure to advertising affects attitude-toward-the ad and attitude-toward-the brand.

19. Attitude-toward-the-Ad Model • Very specific to understanding the impact of advertising on consumer attitudes about a particular product or brand. • Exposure to advertising directly affects beliefs about the ad and brand, and feelings about the ad. • Exposure to advertising indirectly affects attitude toward the brand and attitude toward the ad.

20. Exposure to ad Judgments about the ad (cognition) Feelings from the ad (affect) Beliefs about the brand Attitude toward the ad Attitude toward the brand

21. How Can Marketers Change Attitudes? • Alter components of multiattribute model • Increase belief ratings for the brand • Increase the importance of a key attribute • Decrease the importance of a weak attribute • Add an entirely new attribute • Decrease belief ratings for competitive brands

22. Changing attitudes…. • Change beliefs and attitudes through persuasion • Elaboration likelihood model of persuasion (ELM)

23. Motivation to Elaborate Ability to Elaborate Amount of Elaboration Low High Central Route to Persuasion Peripheral Route to Persuasion Message Arguments Determine persuasion Peripheral Cues Determine persuasion

24. High-involvement processing Cognitive responses Belief and attitude change Behavior change Central route Communication (source,message, channel) Attention and comprehension Peripheral route Low-involvement processing Belief change Behavior change Attitude change

25. Changing attitudes... • Changing attitudes directly though behavior • Cognitive Dissonance Theories • Balance Theory • Social Judgment Theory • Attribution Theory

26. Balance Theory • Consumers strive for consistency between interconnected attitudes. • Marketers can influence attitudes by creating imbalance within the target of persuasion--motivates consumer to change one or more of the interconnected attitudes to restore balance.

27. Social Judgment Theory • Consumers use attitudes as a frame of reference to judge new information. • If high involvement: • Narrow latitude of acceptance • Wide latitude of rejection • Assimilation effect • Contrast effect • If low involvement: • Wide latitude of acceptance • Wide latitude of noncommitment

28. Attribution Theory • Consumers make inferences about behaviors, assign causality--blame or credit--to events on the basis of their or others’ behaviors. • In the process of assigning causality, form attitudes. • Marketing implications: • Offer high quality products • Advertising should emphasize quality. • Moderate-sized incentives.