1 / 12

Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model

Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model. Y.S.U. April 4, 2006. Legislative requirements inform and support an integrated systems approach between NCLB & IDEA 04. IDEIA 108-446. ESEA PL 107-110 No Child Left Behind.

salene
Télécharger la présentation

Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006

  2. Legislative requirements inform and support an integrated systems approach between NCLB & IDEA 04 IDEIA 108-446 ESEA PL 107-110No Child Left Behind Operating Standards for Ohio’s Schools Serving Children with Disabilities OperatingStandards for Ohio’s Schools Academic Content Standards • Accountability-data based decision making • Progress in the general curriculum for ALL students • Systems of Intervention for ALL students • Scientifically Based Instruction • Increased parental involvement

  3. The Ohio Integrated Systems Model for Academic and Behavior Supports The Ohio Integrated Systems Model for Academic and Behavior Supports is a comprehensive school-wide prevention & intervention model that provides support systems which address both academic and behavioral needs of ALL students.

  4. R B R B R B Summative Effects of an Integrated Model Significance BL Shephard Kellam, Johns Hopkins University ReadingInstruction Reading & Behavior Instruction Behavior Instruction

  5. Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model for Academic and Behavior Supports Academic Systems Behavioral Systems 1-5% Intensive Individualized Interventions 1-5% Intensive Individualized Interventions 5-10% Targeted Interventions 5-10% Targeted Interventions 80-90% School-Wide Interventions 80-90% School-Wide Interventions Decisions about tiers of support are data-based Adapted from OSEP Effective School-Wide Interventions

  6. Key Features of an Effective Integrated Model Academic & Behavior Supports Across 3-tiers Administrative Leadership Collaborative Strategic Planning (CPS) Culturally Responsive Practices Data-Based Decision Making Scientifically-Based Research

  7. Ohio’s Standards for the Teaching Profession • Standard 1(Students): Teachers understand student learning and development, and respect the diversity of the students they teach • Standard 2(Content): Teachers know and understand the content area for which they have instructional responsibility • Standard 3(Assessment): Teachers understand and use varied assessments to inform instruction, evaluate and ensure student learning • Standard 4(Instruction): Teachers plan and deliver effective instruction that advances the learning of each individual student

  8. Ohio’s Standards for the Teaching Profession (continued) • Standard 5(Learning Environment): Teachers create learning environments that promote high levels of learning and achievement for all students • Standard 6(Collaboration and Communication): Teachers collaborate and communicate with other educators, administrators, parents and the community to support student learning • Standard 7(Professional Responsibility and Growth): Teachers are professionals who assume responsibility for professional growth, performance and involvement as an individual and a member of a learning community

  9. Ohio’s Standards for Principals • Standard 1(Continuous Improvement): Principals help create a shared vision and clear goals for their schools and ensure continuous improvement toward achieving their goals • Standard 2(Instruction): Principals support the implementation of high-quality, standards-based instruction that results in higher levels of achievement for all students • Standard 3(School Operations, Resources and Learning Environment): Principals allocate resources and manage school operations in order to ensure a safe and productive learning environment

  10. Ohio’s Standards for Principals • Standard 4(Collaboration): Principals establish and sustain collaborative learning and shared leadership to promote student learning and achievement of all students • Standard 5(Parents and Community Engagement): Principals engage parents and community members in the educational process and create an environment where community resources support student learning, achievement and well-being

  11. Ohio’s Professional Development Standards • Standard 1: Effective professional development is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time • Standard 2: Effective professional development is informed by multiple sources of data • Standard 3: Effective professional development is collaborative • Standard 4: Effective professional development includes varied learning experiences that accommodate individual educators’ knowledge and skills • Standard 5: Effective professional development results in the acquisition and refinement of skills and knowledge • Standard 6: Effective professional development is evaluated by its short and long-term impact on professional practice and achievement of all students

  12. More Information • OISM • Michele DiMuzio • 1-800-776-8298 ext. 109 • mcoe_mmd@access-k12.org • Standards • http://esb.ode.state.oh.us

More Related