1 / 26

Practicing Out of the Box: The Research Challenges of Caring for HIV Substance Users

A community perspective. Background

sandra_john
Télécharger la présentation

Practicing Out of the Box: The Research Challenges of Caring for HIV Substance Users

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Practicing Out of the Box: The Research Challenges of Caring for HIV+ Substance Users Chinazo Cunningham, MD Division of General Internal Medicine Dept of Family and Social Medicine MMC/AECOM

    3. Background Montefiore Medical Center CitiWide Harm Reduction CBO serving HIV-infected drug users living in SRO hotels in NYC Started as needle exchange program in 1994, now offers numerous programs Collaboration with Montefiore since 1998 Medical care/outreach Research/evaluation

    4. CitiWides programs Outreach in SRO hotels Needle exchange Case management Health services Mental wellness Support groups Peer education Housing Holistic health Transportation Clothing, showers, meals Research/Evaluation

    5. Health Services Program

    6. SRO Hotel Residents

    7. Research & Evaluation

    8. Objectives / Model

    9. Evaluation of a Medical Outreach Program Background Marginalized HIV+ populations have less access to care, poor health outcomes Outreach programs aim to improve access Few programs evaluated Objectives To evaluated a medical outreach program that targets HIV+ SRO hotel residents in NYC To examine patient- and program-related factors associated with keeping medical appointments

    10. Methods Examined 2781 medical appt records (2003-2005) CitiWide and Montefiore databases Patient-related factors sociodemographic info Program-related factors Appt type: same day/walk-in vs. future appt Appt location: CitiWide vs. SRO hotel vs. CHCC Provider making appt: medical vs. non-medical Analysis Chi-square, regression analysis

    12. Summary Overall 29% of appts were kept Program characteristics, NOT patient characteristics assoc with kept appts Appts kept more often when: At CitiWides drop-in center Same day / walk-in Made by non-medical provider

    13. Implications Changed Health Services Program to provide more appts at CitiWide and same day/walk-in Medical community must examine program-related factors (not just pt-related factors) in delivery of care to marginalized HIV+ populations Same day access One stop shopping

    14. SRO Hotel Residents

    15. Comparison of self report vs. medical records HIV utilization measures Background Numerous studies examine HIV health services using self-reported outcomes Few studies examined validity of these outcomes in marginalized populations Crucial to understand validity of outcome measures for program evaluation Objective: To examine agreement between self-report and medical record HIV health services utilization measures

    16. Methods Cross-sectional study design Sample 522 HIV+ individuals living in 14 SRO hotels in NYC Data Self report from ACASI Medical record extraction by MD Variables HIV-related ambulatory care visits (0, 1, >2 visits) HIV lab markers (CD4, VL) HIV-related medications (ART, PCP, MAC) Analysis percent agreement & Kappa statistic

    17. Results

    18. Results

    19. Conclusions Agreement between self-report and medical records was: Poor for ambulatory visits (? = 0.09) Poor to fair for medication use (? = 0.23-0.43) Poor for lab tests performed (? = 0.06) Good for CD4 count value (? = 0.71) Most disagreement was from patient over-reporting When examining health services utilization in marginalized populations, the use of self-reported measures as outcomes raises concerns.

    20. Partnership with the community & harm reduction

    21. Benefits to working with a CBO Large number of community members in one place Special population not in clinical settings Facilitate trust Direct access to community (SRO hotels) Attractive to funders (community-based participatory research)

    22. Challenges to working with a CBO Different priorities research vs. service Philosophical clash traditional medical system vs. harm reduction* Power, money, resources large academic medical center vs. small CBO Supervision / oversight Two different geographic locations Structural issues Computers, heating, supplies, payroll, etc Staffing professionals vs. para-professionals Salary differential. Cash flow problems. Staffingturnover rate, unique person who is sophisticated and can work in this environment. Salary differential. Cash flow problems. Staffingturnover rate, unique person who is sophisticated and can work in this environment.

    23. Harm Reduction vs. Medical Model

    24. Lesson Learned - Redefine Health Health is NOT the absence of disease Biopsychosocial model including drugs housing support system finances violence criminal justice issues Life priorities of HIV+ IDUs Only 37% ranked HIV as most important Top priorities: housing, money, safety from violence

    25. Lessons Learned Redefine Goals and Success Success is NOT just: Undetectable viral load Abstinence from drug use Success also includes: Making it to appointments Preventative care (PCP/MAC prophylaxis, vaccinations, PAP smears, PPD) Less, safer, more controlled drug use Improvement in non-medical areas (housing, support system, criminal activity, etc.)

    26. Lessons Learned Working with a CBO is an investment Integration into CBO legitimizes the research notice problems before they become too big buy-in from other CBO staff Difficult to conduct research in setting where it is not a priority Need face-to-face time and close oversight of research staff Communication and transparency

More Related