1 / 49

The Analysis and Interpretation of Water-Oil Ratio Performance in Petroleum Reservoirs

The Analysis and Interpretation of Water-Oil Ratio Performance in Petroleum Reservoirs. Valentina Bondar. Texas A&M University Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering. 12 January 2001. Outline. Introduction Conventional WOR Analysis (Steady-State WOR Model)

sandra_john
Télécharger la présentation

The Analysis and Interpretation of Water-Oil Ratio Performance in Petroleum Reservoirs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Analysis and Interpretation of Water-Oil Ratio Performance in Petroleum Reservoirs Valentina Bondar Texas A&M University Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering 12 January 2001

  2. Outline • Introduction • Conventional WOR Analysis (Steady-State WOR Model) • Pseudosteady-State WOR Model • Analysis of WOR • Conclusions and Recommendations

  3. Outline • Introduction • Conventional WOR Analysis (Steady-State WOR Model) • Pseudosteady-State WOR Model • Analysis of WOR • Conclusions and Recommendations

  4. Objective • Provide the development of a pseudo-steady-state WOR equation. • Estimate and compare values of "movable" oil using various straight-line extrapolation methods. • Introduce two new methods for esti-mating Np,mov. • Perform "qualitative" analysis of oil and water production data.

  5. Introduction • 20 Wells in the North Robertson Unit (West Texas) • 8 Wells in the West White Lake Field (South Louisiana)

  6. Outline • Introduction • Conventional WOR Analysis (Steady-State WOR Model) • Pseudosteady-State WOR Model • Analysis of WOR • Conclusions and Recommendations

  7. Linear log(krw/kro) versus Sw Conventional WOR Analysis Steady-State WOR Model

  8. fw Np Conventional WOR Analysis log(fw) versus Np

  9. fw = 1 Conventional WOR Analysis log(fw) versus Np

  10. Outline • Introduction • Conventional WOR Analysis (Steady-State WOR Model) • Pseudosteady-State WOR Model • Analysis of WOR • Conclusions and Recommendations

  11. Blasingame and Lee bpss m Pseudosteady-State WOR Model

  12. Pseudosteady-State WOR Model

  13. Pseudosteady-State WOR Model

  14. Pseudosteady-State WOR Model

  15. mw mo fw tw to bppsw bppso Pseudosteady-State WOR Model log(fw) versus Np

  16. fw tw to Pseudosteady-State WOR Model log(fw) versus Np

  17. Pseudosteady-State WOR Model Results from the PSS WOR modelversus the field production data

  18. Pseudosteady-State WOR Model log(fw) versus Np

  19. Pseudosteady-State WOR Model Results from the PSS WOR modelversus the field production data

  20. Outline • Introduction • Conventional WOR Analysis (Steady-State WOR Model) • Pseudosteady-State WOR Model • Analysis of WOR • Conclusions and Recommendations

  21. Analysis of WOR Data Estimation of Movable Oil • Conventional techniques • log(qo) versusproduction time, t • qo versus cumulative oil production, Np • fo versus cumulative oil production, Np • log(fw) versus cumulative oil production, Np • Ershagi's X-function • New techniques • 1/fw versus cumulative oil production, Np • 1/qo versus oil material balance time, to

  22. Analysis of WOR Data Qualitative Analysis • log(fwc) versus cumulative oil production, Np • log(WORc) versus cumulative oil production, Np • log(WOR) versus total production, (Np+Wp) • log(fo) versus total material balance time, tt • WOR and WOR associated functions versus time, t (to)

  23. Analysis of WOR Data Estimation of Movable Oil • Conventional techniques • log(qo) versusproduction time, t • qo versus cumulative oil production, Np • fo versus cumulative oil production, Np • log(fw) versus cumulative oil production, Np • Ershagi's X-function • New techniques • 1/fw versus cumulative oil production, Np • 1/qo versus oil material balance time, to

  24. Analysis of WOR Data log(qo) and log(qw) versus t

  25. qo=0 Analysis of WOR Data qo versus Np

  26. fo=0 Analysis of WOR Data fo versus Np

  27. fw = 1 Analysis of WOR Data log(fw ) versus Np

  28. X-function= -5.6 @ fw = 0.99 Analysis of WOR Data Ershagi’s X-plot Np=145,000 STB X = ln((1/fw)-1)-1/fw

  29. Analysis of WOR Data Estimation of Movable Oil • Conventional techniques • log(qo) versusproduction time, t • qo versus cumulative oil production, Np • fo versus cumulative oil production, Np • log(fw) versus cumulative oil production, Np • Ershagi's X-function • New techniques • 1/fw versus cumulative oil production, Np • 1/qo versus oil material balance time, to

  30. 1/fw=1 Analysis of WOR Data 1/fw versus Np

  31. 1/qo Np /qo Analysis of WOR Data 1/qo versus Np/qo

  32. Analysis of WOR Data Reciprocal of qo versus oil material balance time

  33. b Analysis of WOR Data 1/qo versus Np/qo

  34. Analysis of WOR Data 1/qo versus Np/qo Np,mov = 164,500 STB

  35. Analysis of WOR Data fwc versus Np Np,mov = 164,500 STB

  36. Analysis of WOR Data Comparison of the estimated Np values

  37. Analysis of WOR Data Qualitative Analysis • log(fwc) versus cumulative oil production, Np • log(WORc) versus cumulative oil production, Np • log(WOR) versus total production, (Np+Wp) • log(fo) versus total material balance time, tt • WOR and WOR associated functions versus time, t (to)

  38. Analysis of WOR Data WORversus (Np+Wp)

  39. Analysis of WOR Data fo versus (Np+Wp)/(qo+qw)

  40. Analysis of WOR Data WOR and WOR' versus (Np/qo)

  41. Analysis of WOR Data WOR integral andintegral-derivative versus (Np/qo)

  42. Outline • Introduction • Conventional WOR Analysis (Steady-State WOR Model) • Pseudosteady-State WOR Model • Analysis of WOR • Conclusions and Recommendations

  43. Conclusions Pseudosteady-state WOR model • We have developed a new pss WOR model for boundary-dominated reservoir behavior. • The proposed pss WOR model provides the best representation of the oil and water production data for the cases that we in-vestigated. • The only significant limitation of the our model is that it does not provide a mechan-ism for the prediction of future production

  44. Conclusions (cont.) Estimation of Movable Oil • We provide a compilation of the "conven-tional" straight-line extrapolation methods. These techniques should be applied simultaneously in order to obtain consis-tent estimates of movable oil. • We proposed two new methods for estimating movable oil reserves: • 1/fw versus Np • 1/qo versus Np/qo

  45. Conclusions (cont.) Estimation of Movable Oil • The results obtained by these new methods correspond quite well to the results obtained "conventional" WOR techniques. Analysis of Oil and Water Production Data • We note a straight-line behavior for the fwc and WORc functions plotted versus Np. However, the extrapolation of these straight-line trends does not lead to similar result for movable oil as the "conventional" extrapolation techniques.

  46. Conclusions (cont.) Analysis of Oil and Water Production Data • We have extended the diagnostic plots proposed by Chan. The following obser-vations are noted: • unit slope of the WOR and WOR integral and integral-derivative functions when plotted versus t, to, tt. • the WOR' function is typically very erratic and can not be used for routine analysis due to poor overall behavior.

  47. Conclusions (cont.) Analysis of Oil and Water Production Data • We believe that the X-plot method provides no substantive advantage over the "conventional" extrapolation techniques. The extrapolation of the X-function tends to significantly overestimate the value of movable oil.

  48. Recommendations • Investigate the possibility of using the proposed pss WOR model for the estimation of movable oil. • Examine a possibility to develop an analysis scheme to estimate pss parameters (bpsso, bpssw, mo, and mw). We suggest that the para-meters can be further used for reservoir analysis. • We suggest further qualitative and quantitative analysis for the various WOR trends as a function of time, cumulative production, material balance time. A”type curve" approach may be possible.

  49. The Analysis and Interpretation of Water-Oil Ratio Performance in Petroleum Reservoirs Valentina Bondar Texas A&M University Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering 12 January 2001

More Related