1 / 38

Winter Semester 2010

Emerging Systems. Course No. 4: Expanding Bio-Inspiration: Towards Reliable MuxTree  Memory Arrays – Part 1 –. ”Politehnica” University of Timisoara. Winter Semester 2010. Outline.

sanne
Télécharger la présentation

Winter Semester 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Emerging Systems Course No. 4: Expanding Bio-Inspiration: Towards Reliable MuxTree Memory Arrays – Part 1 – ”Politehnica” University of Timisoara Winter Semester 2010

  2. Outline • Chapter 1: Bio-Inspired Reliability(With a plea for bio-inspiration and a comparison between artificial Embryonics cells and the stem cells from biology) • Chapter 2: A Bird’s Eye View Over Faults (Includes fault tolerance motivation, causes of unexpected, soft errors and a description of the physical phenomena involved) • Chapter 3: Embryonics and SEUs (Particularities of the project, datapath model in memory structures, and reliability analysis)

  3. Chapter 1: Bio-Inspired Reliability (1) 1.1. Introduction • Performance VS Fault Tolerance ↓ Performance AND Fault Tolerance • Hot issues in bio-inspiration: • mimicking nature, also mimic results? • Intersection point: where? • exporting biological features toward computer engineering: possible?

  4. Chapter 1: Bio-Inspired Reliability (2) 1.2. A Plea for Bio-Inspiration • Existing: intrinsic robustness of living beings • Sustaining many minor wounds/illnesses: self-diagnosing • Quick healing: growing/replacing damaged tissues • Perfected in time • Wanted: robust computing systems • Self-testing and self-repair mechanisms through redundancies • Immunotronics: bio-inspired immune system for silicon devices

  5. Chapter 1: Bio-Inspired Reliability (3) 1.2. A Plea for Bio-Inspiration • HW redundancy • Spares take over faulty resources * • Process supervised centrally • Overall reliability limited by centralized unit • Bio-inspired redundancy (Embryonics) • Spares take over faulty resources * • Process distributed • Multiple level redundancy

  6. Chapter 1: Bio-Inspired Reliability (4) 1.3. Embryonics and Stem Cells • Human brain • Exponent of epigenetic systems • Complexity given by 1010 cells and 1014 interconnections • All from a single, original cell: the zygote • Stem cells • Recently discovered • Division potential apparently unlimited • Offspring: identical or able to specialize • Anyone potentially becoming a fetus

  7. Chapter 1: Bio-Inspired Reliability (5) 1.3. Embryonics and Stem Cells Similarities: • Cells made by molecules. No limits on cell number or cellular dimensions • Indefinite cellular division. Process not material, but informational • Specialization via gene expression: information governs over functionality

  8. Presentation Outline • Chapter 1: Bio-Inspired Reliability(With a plea for bio-inspiration and a comparison between artificial Embryonics cells and the stem cells from biology) • Chapter 2: A Bird’s Eye View Over Faults (Includes fault tolerance motivation, causes of unexpected, soft errors and a description of the physical phenomena involved) • Chapter 3: Embryonics and SEUs (Particularities of the project, datapath model in memory structures, and reliability analysis)

  9. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (1) 2.1. Bio-Inspired Storage • Genetic program stored into cyclic memory structure – macro-cell • Large genomes → large macro-cells → increased error likelihood • Two-level self-repair mechanism refers to system functionality only • Data integrity extremely important, functionality governed by genome • No data integrity protection implemented

  10. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (4) 2.2. Fault Taxonomy Over Time • Permanent faults: affect normal device operation constantly, over an indefinite period of time; solid or hard fails • Non-permanent faults: random occurrence, effect over indefinite but finite periods of time; • Intermittent: non-environmental causes (parameter variations, timing, loose connections, etc); difficult debugging process • Transient: environmental causes (atmospheric parameters, supply characteristics, cosmic rays); very difficult/impossible to model ↓ • Soft fails, soft errors or single event upsets (SEUs): transient type

  11. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (6) 2.3. Single Event Upsets: An Analysis • Affect normal execution process • Mostly caused byelectronic noise: ionization electron-hole pairs • Particles capable of generating, energetic nucleons and nuclear fragments: • α–particles • radioactive isotopes • other particles grouped under the more general term of cosmic rays

  12. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (7) 2.3. Single Event Upsets: An Analysis • Radiation affecting devices long known • 1978, Ziegler (IBM): if α–particles affect semiconductor devices, then other particles from the outer space (cosmic rays) also might • 1979, May and Woods (Intel): radioactive isotopes affect memories • Confirmation under device irradiating • Studied since 1980, hot field today

  13. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (8) 2.3. Single Event Upsets: An Analysis • Protective techniques used in modern devices • Focus on memories, prone to soft fails: • Techniques well understood, relatively easy to implement, not expensive • Memory area in systems proportionally significant • Combinational logic much less susceptible to soft errors • SER not constant, dependant on technological advancement

  14. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (9) 2.3.1. Radioactive Isotopes • Due to proximity contamination in semiconductor facilities • Famous “HERA” problem, 1987: • IBM produced LSI memories hit by anomalous behavior • Chips produce in US and Europe, but only US-produced batches affected • Package responsibility ruled out

  15. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (10) 2.3.1. Radioactive Isotopes • Finally, traces of Po210 discovered • Product of the uranium decay chain • Strangely, other expected particles totally missing • After months of searching, the culprit found as a bottle of nitric acid, used in the process • Intel also hit by problems: 2107 series, 16Kb DRAM memories • Cause: radioactive contamination • Reason: factory built downstream, close to an old uranium mine

  16. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (11) 2.3.2. Cosmic Ray Influence • Strong electromagnetic perturbations induced by any ionizing particle hitting an electronic device • Disturbances translate into electron–hole pairs • If local fields sufficiently strong, pairs cannot recombine; instead, find a way out to the nearest appropriate contact • Charge collection provoke soft errors

  17. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (12) 2.3.2. Cosmic Ray Influence • Particles entering atmosphere collide: elastic and inelastic collisions • Secondary nuclear fragments generated in avalanche-type phenomena: nucleons, pions, light ions (2H, 3H, 3He and α–particles), and heavy residual nuclei (O, C, Mg) • Disturbances created by cosmic ray collision with semiconductor nuclei • High-energy particle flux born, reaching the surface

  18. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (13) 2.3.2. Cosmic Ray Influence • Final flux distribution affected by: • Altitude: Due to atmospheric filtering effect, the lower the altitude, the smaller particle rate • Geomagnetic region (GMR): shielding of Earth‘s magnetic field; cosmic rays penetration smallest around equator, largest at poles • 11-year solar cycle: strongly affects particle flux; increased sun activity leads to lower rate of particles, because shielding effect of magnetic field around the earth also strengthened

  19. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (14) 2.3.2. Cosmic Ray Influence • Attempts on flux measurement as early as 1980s (IBM). At least 3 categories of cosmic rays • Primary cosmic rays: lurking particles in the outer space, eventually may hit the planet; product of intense reactions

  20. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (15) 2.3.2. Cosmic Ray Influence • Sun also major source of primary cosmic rays • Measured flux of primary cosmic rays about 105/m2·s • Secondary cosmic rays: born by collisions when primary cosmic rays enter atmosphere; also known as “cascade particles”

  21. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (16) 2.3.2. Cosmic Ray Influence • Terrestrial cosmic rays: particles actually reaching sea-level • max. 1% originate from primary cosmic rays • the rest cascade-generated particles, from the 3rd to 7th generations • extremes in sea-level particle flux lag solar cycle by 1-2 years • Final flux made of hadrons (collide due to atmospheric density), leptons and photons

  22. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (18) 2.3.2. Cosmic Ray Influence • Flux measurement : 360/m2·s • Most particles decay spontaneously or reach thermal energies (absorbed by the atmosphere) • Peak of cascading density at an altitude of about 15 km, usually referred to as the Pfotzer point • Altitude used by many commercial aircraft • This is where the fail rate of electronic devices is about 100 times worse than at terrestrial altitudes

  23. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (19) 2.3.2. Cosmic Ray Influence • After protons hit atmosphere most resulting fragments decay or absorbed • Proton flux largely affected by interactions with atmospheric electrons • Muons dominate the medium/ high energy particle spectrum • Energetic levels of most concern for SER between 200 and 3000MeV

  24. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (21) 2.3.3. Modelling Cosmic Ray Influence • Significant effort towards particle measurements • Vast effort in providing computational models • CREME96 (Cosmic Ray Effects on Micro Electronics Code): numerical models for ionizing radiations (near-Earth orbits) and effects in spacecraft • NUSPA (NUclear SPAllation): initial focus on sea-level interactions (where protons and neutrons play the most significant role); extended model interactions at high altitudes, including pion interactions

  25. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (22) 2.3.4. Introduction to Particle Physics • All known particles made of 2 types of building bricks: leptons and quarks • Leptons: do not interact by strong nuclear force • electrons, muons, tau particles, and their associated neutrinos • believed to be point-like particles • Hadrons: interact by strong nuclear force • Mesons: made by 2 quarks (pions) • Baryons: made by 3 quarks (protons and neutrons)

  26. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (23) 2.3.4. Introduction to Particle Physics • At sea-level approx. 94% of hadron total flux made by neutrons, 2% protons • Neutrons (uncharged particles) usually go through electrical circuits with no interactions • Unless combined into a nucleus, a free neutron follows a β-decay process (10.3 min half-life)

  27. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (24) 2.3.4. Introduction to Particle Physics • Only 1 neutron out of 4·104 hit a silicon nucleus • Hit very likely to produce soft fail • About 105 neutrons/cm2·year at sea level above 20MeV • Neutron flux exponentially influenced by altitude

  28. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (24) 2.3.4. Introduction to Particle Physics • Pions (π-mesons): unstable particles, 135MeV mass, 2% of total hadron flux at sea-level • neutral pion (its anti-particle being itself), with a lifetime of 10-16s • positive pion (its anti-particle being the negative pion), longer lifetimes of about 26ns (26·10-9s) • SER contribution expected negligible due to small numbers compared to other nucleons

  29. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (25) 2.3.4. Introduction to Particle Physics • Particles released during pion decay: electron, positron, gamma ray, muon, and neutrino • Charged pions can interact with matter • Low-energy positive pions repelled by the nucleus

  30. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (27) 2.3.4. Introduction to Particle Physics • Energetic, positive pion may lose kinetic energy to a nucleus • Pion capture, most contributive to SER • Pion-capture: entire pion mass is transformed into nucleonic energy, provoking a nuclear fision

  31. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (28) 2.3.4. Introduction to Particle Physics • Every negative pion capture within the active volume of an electronic circuit leads to a soft fail • Pion capture into silicon about 8.5/cm3·year at sea-level • For intermediate energies (between 100 and 250 MeV) pion contributions to SER of modern chips (16-Mb DRAMs) about 5 times greater that SER caused by protons • Pions may have significant impact at aircraft altitudes • Studies of pion-induced soft errors still in progress

  32. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (29) 2.3.4. Introduction to Particle Physics • Muons (μ-leptons):lifetime of 2.2 us • Produced in the upper atmosphere by pion decay • Two effects leading to soft fails: • electrostatic muon scattering from nuclei • muon capture (about 510/cm3·year): orbiting a Si nucleus; most of the initial mass-energy, the neutrino

  33. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (30) 2.3.5. Ion-Induced SEUs • Discrete satellite components highly resistant to radiations; modern satellites sensitive • Energetic heavy ions (100MeV Fe) at least partly responsible for reported fails • Croley et al.: roughly two-thirds of the fails due to ions with Z ≥ 6 (C, O, Fe, N, Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, Ca) • At satellite altitudes heavy energetic ions responsible for at least 45% (roughly equal proportions with the proton-induced) of SEUs

  34. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (31) 2.3.6. Neutron-Induced SEUs • Pathway of electron–hole pairs due to the energetic impact of a high-energy neutron striking a p-n junction • Minimum charge resulting in a soft error called critical charge (QCRIT) • Two types of neutron interactions: • Elastic scattering (target nucleus not excited, until QCRIT becomes smaller that 50fC minor role in SER) • Inelastic scattering

  35. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (32) 2.3.6. Neutron-Induced SEUs • Inelastic scattering nucleon + target → X1 + X2 + …+ Xn + residual nucleus • much higher exchange energies (order of MeV or larger) • identity of incoming particle lost • pions may also be produced • Example of inelastic scattering:

  36. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (32) 2.3.7. α-Induced SEUs • Natural decay processes (of U, Th, Ac and Np) generate helium ions 4He or α–particles • α–particles large mass and charge, most upsetting • α–decay may release energetic α–particles

  37. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (33) 2.3.7. α-Induced SEUs • Also due to impurities in semiconductor chip materials and packaging • Technological progress, careful supervision of materials quality: α–particle SER momentum lost • α–particles also emitted by at most 3% of captured muons

  38. Chapter 2: A Birds-Eye View Over Faults (33) 2.3.8. Proton-Induced SEUs • Particle distribution change with altitude • Inelastic scattering example: • Uncertainties concerning proton influences over silicon

More Related