1 / 23

Project RFP’s

Project RFP’s. Brian Bayliss Mathew Dicke Nathan Ferrel. Overview. Discussion of RFP #1 (Maze) Discussion of RFP #2 (Scavenger Hunt) Cost Benefit Analysis Questions? . Analysis of RFP #1 Maze Solving Robots. Objective

sasson
Télécharger la présentation

Project RFP’s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project RFP’s Brian Bayliss Mathew Dicke Nathan Ferrel

  2. Overview • Discussion of RFP #1 (Maze) • Discussion of RFP #2 (Scavenger Hunt) • Cost Benefit Analysis • Questions?

  3. Analysis of RFP #1 Maze Solving Robots • Objective Build two computer controlled robots that can navigate their way through a maze while communicating with one another. The task is completed when each robot finds the end and then returns to the beginning of the maze. The competition is won by the fastest maze solving time.

  4. Analysis of RFP #1 Maze Solving Robots • Robot Operation - must be autonomous - simultaneously solve maze. - The robots must communicate wirelessly. (Once a solution is found the other robot will be sent the solution and it must follow it.)

  5. Analysis of RFP #1 Maze Solving Robots • Robot Operation - once each robot gets to the end of the maze it must be able to retrace its path back to the beginning. - they must be able to avoid colliding with one another in the hallways (time penalties will result)

  6. Analysis of RFP #1 Maze Solving Robots • Robot Operation - they must stay within the walls of the maze (time penalties will result and possible disqualification).

  7. Analysis of RFP #1 Maze Solving Robots • The Maze - Maze walls will consist of white tape on the black floor of the arena - Start and end will be represented by different colored tape - Hallways will be 25 cm wide - Only one solution to each maze - Maze layout will be unknown prior to each competition

  8. Analysis of RFP #1 Maze Solving Robots

  9. Analysis of RFP #1 Maze Solving Robots • Robot Physical Design Specs - built from provided components - within $200 budget for extra parts - fit within a 13 cm x 10 cm square (no height restriction) - wireless communication scheme chosen by groups.

  10. Analysis of RFP #1 Maze Solving Robots • Strategy It would increase efficiency for each robot to let the other one know what paths it has taken in the maze.

  11. Overview • Discussion of RFP #1 (Maze) • Discussion of RFP #2 (Scavenger Hunt) • Cost Benefit Analysis • Questions?

  12. Analysis of RFP #2 Scavenger Robots • Objective Build a computer controlled robot that searches an arena for specific items with certain shapes, sizes, and colors. A “list” of items is given to the robot at the beginning of the competition. It must find those items and return them to its base before time is up.

  13. Analysis of RFP #2 Scavenger Robots • Robot Operation - must be autonomous - must be able to discriminate between objects based on shape, color, and size. - must be able to collect items and take them to their home basket.

  14. Analysis of RFP #2 Scavenger Robots • Robot Operation - must implement collision avoidance - must be able to identify home basket

  15. Analysis of RFP #2 Scavenger Robots • The Arena - consists of a mostly open area of 5 ft x 10 ft - baskets on each end of the arena - possible obstacles throughout the arena

  16. Analysis of RFP #2 Scavenger Robots

  17. Analysis of RFP #2 Scavenger Robots • Robot Physical Design Specs - built from provided components - within $100 budget for extra parts - fit within a 30 cm cube

  18. Analysis of RFP #2 Scavenger Robots • Strategy 1. Pick up each item separately and return to basket one at a time. 2. Pick up multiple items at once and return to basket after obtaining a full payload.

  19. Overview • Discussion of RFP #1 (Maze) • Discussion of RFP #2 (Scavenger Hunt) • Cost Benefit Analysis • Questions?

  20. Cost Benefit AnalysisRFP #1 • Extra Required Expenses - Wireless Communications - Multiple Robots • More work and time? • Experience in wireless

  21. Cost Benefit AnalysisRFP #2 • No Required Extra Expenses - Cameras - Better Sensors • More Mechanical Work • Possibly Less Stress • Exciting

  22. Overview • Discussion of RFP #1 (Maze) • Discussion of RFP #2 (Scavenger Hunt) • Cost Benefit Analysis • Questions?

  23. QUESTIONS?

More Related