1 / 19

Improving medication management in the emergency department at Royal Perth Hospital

Improving medication management in the emergency department at Royal Perth Hospital. Lea Dias - ED Pharmacist Barry Jenkins, Chief Pharmacist Dr Frank Sanfilippo, Population Health, UWA Stephen Witney - ED Technician. Background. ED is under-serviced by pharmacy at RPH

sauda
Télécharger la présentation

Improving medication management in the emergency department at Royal Perth Hospital

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving medication management in the emergency department at Royal Perth Hospital Lea Dias - ED Pharmacist Barry Jenkins, Chief Pharmacist Dr Frank Sanfilippo, Population Health, UWA Stephen Witney - ED Technician

  2. Background • ED is under-serviced by pharmacy at RPH • Significant medication safety concerns • Significant continuity of care issues • Funding obtained for a pharmacist and technician from Oct 05 - June 06

  3. Aim • Introduce a comprehensive service • patient own medication bags • frequent stock checks and analysis • access to a clinical pharmacist during business hrs • introduce an electronic drug formulary • investigate the role of the pharmacist & technician • Conduct a Pilot study • assess the accuracy of medication history taking • assess the impact of pharmacy involvement

  4. Achievements • Patient Own Medication Bags (POMBs) introduced and written into hospital policy • Drug protocols and administration guidelines on ED intranet • Service to nursing & medical staff improved • Pilot study completed and analysed

  5. Pilot study summary • Primary objective: • To compare the accuracy of medications recorded on the medication chart against a validated medication history taken by the pharmacist for high-risk patients. • Secondary objective • Assess the utility of the pharmacy service in reviewing high risk patients and resolving medication related problems.

  6. Method • Service • 1FTE clinical pharmacist, 1FTE Technician • Mon-Fri 8:00am-4:30pm • Sample - high risk patients • Inclusion criteria • admitted patients with a completed drug chart •  65 years old or  5 medications • Exclusion criteria • nil medications pre-admission • Recruitment • once or twice daily ward rounds in all ED areas • 9th April - 30th May 06 (period of 7 weeks)

  7. Method • Role of the technician • Record pre-admission medication information • patient’s own medications/list or WebsterPak® • GP letters • nursing home/pharmacy medication list • previous admission at RPH • discharge letters • Record medications charted on admission

  8. Method • Role of the pharmacist • Validate history with at least two sources • Reconcile pre-admission medication history with charted medications • Classify discrepancy as; • intentional (deliberate changes) eg. withheld, new or cease drug, OR • unintentional (errors) eg. drug omission, drug commission, or incorrect dose. • Communicate discrepancies • written in blue notes • verbally with team or ward pharmacist • attach Medication Action Plan to chart

  9. Method

  10. Method • Introduced towards the end of the study.

  11. Analysis • Data analysed using SPSS • Lost to follow up • subjects that satisfied the selection criteria but were lost to the ward/discharged before being seen by the ED Pharmacist • these subjects were not included in the results • Patients not screened • lack of resources did not permit all high-risk pts to be reviewed and included in the results. • sub-sample of these patients to test for selection bias

  12. Results

  13. Results 2

  14. Distribution of unintentional errors Patients Unintentional errors

  15. Discussion • Unintentional discrepancies (errors) • mean of 2.1 per patient • Intentional (deliberate) changes • mean of 0.9 per patient • On discharge must account for:- • all errors not corrected in ED and • all deliberate changes initiated in ED and • all other discrepancies arising from the ward

  16. Conclusion • Primary objective[To compare the accuracy of medications recorded on the medication chart against a validated medication history taken by the pharmacist for high-risk patients.] • there is a high incidence of unintentional error in admission medication histories for high-risk patients • Secondary Objective[Assess the utility of the pharmacy service in reviewing high risk patients and resolving medication related problems] • a pharmacist/technician based pharmacy service identified, and in a third of cases, corrected, unintentional medication errors

  17. Key messages • Don’t rely on old information - validate it • Accurate discharge letter is vital • Undetected errors made on admission may go uncorrected at discharge • Medical and nursing staff benefit from clinical pharmacy services • A dedicated ED pharmacy service improves the medication management of admitted patients

More Related