10 likes | 111 Vues
This study evaluates the acceptability and feasibility of using Fenzian electrobiofeedback treatment among individuals with asthma in the Caribbean. Results show high tolerability and improved quality of life during treatment, indicating the potential for further research.
E N D
Tolerability of FenzianElectrobiofeedbackTreatment for Asthma in a Caribbean Population Selvi Jeyaseelan1, Ian Hambleton1, Nkemcho Ojeh1, Noel Archer1, Amy Browne1, Natasha Sobers-Grannum1, Pam Giddings2, James Colthurst2, Gregory B. Diette3 1Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill, Barbados; 2Fenzian Ltd, Hungerford UK, 3Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA • Background: • Asthma is a significant public health problem in Barbados • Side effects and fears about medication use can limit acceptability of available treatment • Non-pharmacologic approaches to asthma, if efficacious, may be desirable • The purpose of this study to determine if a non-pharmacologic treatment (Fenzian) is acceptable for use among people with asthma in the Caribbean. • Methods: • The Fenzian treatment system consists of a trained medical practitioner and an FDA-registered device that provides biofeedback using transcutaneous stimulation with very low dose electrical impulses • Subjects with doctor-diagnosed asthma were recruited from private health care facilities in Barbados for this unmasked, uncontrolled clinical trial. • Subjects received 16 treatments over 4 weeks. Assessments included acceptability of treatment, asthma symptoms, lung function, and QOL • T-tests were performed on post vs. pre-treatment values, with p<0.05 considered significant. • At one-month post treatment, each participant was contacted for three peak flow readings (FEV1, PEFR). • Conclusions: • Tolerability and acceptability of Fenzian are high in patients with asthma in Barbados, pointing to feasibility of conducting a larger, definitive study. • In this uncontrolled study, quality of life and asthma control improved during treatment, while lung function did not • 6 participants were able to be contacted at 1 year post study. At enrollment, they had been using [mean (range), 7 (1-18)] puffs of albuterol per day. At 1 year, only 1 of 6 was using albuterol regularly, while 3 had stopped completely. I used it if he ‘encountered smoke’ once every three months. The other had some albuterol for a chest infection. • Larger, controlled studies of Fenzian are warrented to determine if this treatment is efficacious in asthma.