1 / 24

Process in the World as a Transaction

Process in the World as a Transaction . Nick Rossiter, Michael Heather Northumbria University nick.rossiter@unn.ac.uk http://computing.unn.ac.uk/staff/cgnr1/. Classical (Database) Transactions . Properties of ACID: A tomicity collection of operations viewed as single process C onsistency

saxton
Télécharger la présentation

Process in the World as a Transaction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Process in the World as a Transaction Nick Rossiter, Michael Heather Northumbria University nick.rossiter@unn.ac.uk http://computing.unn.ac.uk/staff/cgnr1/

  2. Classical (Database) Transactions • Properties of ACID: • Atomicity • collection of operations viewed as single process • Consistency • rules of organisation obeyed • Isolation • no results released until end • Durability • results are guaranteed to persist

  3. Closure is Difficult • For instance in ATM withdrawal: • mixture of physical and logical tasks • once cash given to customer, cannot undo • bank at risk unless results are immediately durable • Notion of Transaction Log: • save results to a number of different targets (disks) • only complete when successfully write to last target disk

  4. Recovery • If bank information system crashes; • transaction log can be run through from • last known position (savepoint) to • most recent successful transaction • partial transactions are discarded • So if disk crashes after customer paid £1,000,000 in a suitcase of notes • system will re-run the transaction and customer will have account debited

  5. But some risk remains • Strategy A to favour bank: • If ATM crashes before money paid out and after last transaction log entry made: • customer’s account is debited but customer has no cash • Strategy B to favour customer: • If transaction log entry fails after cash paid to customer: • customer has the cash and no debit to account

  6. In practice • A bank would probably not adopt strategy B as it could lose money • Strategy A is workable if: • ATM downtimes are accurately recorded • Enables customer accounts to be corrected • Corrections could be made semi-automatically with supervisory control • Recourse to higher level

  7. Problem of Physical/Logical Mix • Example of the principle of Landauer • Information cannot exist except in the physical form • All transactions ultimately involve physical objects • need to handle together • physical entities • logic of the information system

  8. Parallel processing • Transactions involve a sequence of operations • But often the operations should be in parallel • Sequence is used because of: • von Neumann architecture • locality of view • sequence of operations between fixed cells

  9. Theory of Transactions • Need constructions to: • represent changes between states as dynamic relationships • indicate desired change in state • indicate rules controlling change in state • measure changes in state that occur

  10. Satisfying Theory - Category Theory • Need constructions to: • represent changes between states as dynamic relationships • adjunctions • indicate desired change in state • free functor (F) • indicate rules controlling change in state • underlying functor (G) • measure changes in state that occur • unit and counit of adjunction (, ) •  from left-adjoint perspective •  from right-adjoint perspective

  11. Adjunction Example: Mapping Universe to Information System A

  12. Initial State Blue = category/object; red = functor; green = natural transformation

  13. One cycle -- to right (F) and left (G) -- no change

  14. One cycle -- to right (GF) and left (FG) -- change by  in S and  in A Adjoint if triangles commute If  is or  is , then equivalence relation

  15. Two cycles -- to right (GFGF) and left (FGFG) -- change by  in S and  in A Gives symmetry in treatment of S and A Dynamical relationship Perhaps one cycle enforces rules, second cycle commits

  16. Abstract View of Effect of GF

  17. Textbook representation of adjunction -- triangle only

  18. Transactions are Non-local • This banking transaction is typical of any transaction as a non-local process. • The log provides a parallel information system: • looking forward to the sequence • looking back to check that what was expected was achieved.

  19. Possible Approaches to Banking ATM Transaction Security Bank Customer Funds-check Grant Cash Simple commutative requirement Grant = Funds-check o Security Does not show state changes or rules

  20. Adjointness between Customer and Bank Pin number  String match f* Bank Customer Access   -| f*-| Better, shows relationships as adjunctions Does not show state changes

  21. One cycle -- to right (FG) and left (GF) -- change by  in S (Customer) and  in A (Bank) F Funds request (free functor), G Status check (underlying functor applying rules) If  is or  is ,then no change to categories so back to initial state - transaction is aborted

  22. Two cycles -- to right (GFGF) and left (FGFG) -- change by  in S and  in A Second cycle acts from banking perspective Introduces g in bank category Commits and releases cash Should be brief in execution for safety

  23. Achievement of ACID • A, I are natural, achieved through closure in adjointness • C is natural, achieved through underlying functor in adjointness • D is natural, represented by back and forward components • log file is not represented directly but such a file is an artefact needed in a sequential system

  24. Universe Transactions • The universe carries out transactions all the time non-locally • mediating between objects in time and space. • nevertheless still has the forward and back components except that they are non-local.

More Related