1 / 6

Jose de Acosta ( 1539-1600 ) Historia natural y moral

Jose de Acosta ( 1539-1600 ) Historia natural y moral http://www.archive.org/details/historianaturaly01acos. William Bartram Used contemporary Creek Indians as analogs for interpreting prehistoric mound sites http://www.archive.org/details/travelsthroughno00bart. Bacon and Descartes

scot
Télécharger la présentation

Jose de Acosta ( 1539-1600 ) Historia natural y moral

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jose de Acosta (1539-1600) • Historia natural y moral • http://www.archive.org/details/historianaturaly01acos

  2. William Bartram • Used contemporary Creek Indians as analogs for interpreting prehistoric mound sites • http://www.archive.org/details/travelsthroughno00bart

  3. Bacon and Descartes • Observation, classification, and experimentation • Learned works of antiquity not ultimate source of knowledge • Royal Society of London influenced by these ideas • Founded in 1660 by Charles II • Originally titled, “The Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge” • Oldest continuous scientific academy • Members of the Royal Society attempted to determine how • large stones were moved • monuments were constructed • stone tools were made.

  4. John Aubrey (1626-1697) • member of Royal Society • familiar with Baconian method • Studied Aveburystarting in 1649 and Stonehenge in 1663 • Monumenta Britannica and argued that the two sites were druid temples. Not published until the 1800s, but the manuscript was available for consultation. • “Comparative antiquities” • “to make the stones give evidence for themselves”

  5. William Stukeley (1687-1756) • Recognized that crop marks were archaeological features • Grouped monuments of similar form (like Aubrey) • Recognized long pre-Roman occupation • Different types of monuments might have been built at different times. • Attempted to determine relative dates for monuments with no historical record • Construction layers at SilburyHill • A Roman road swerved to avoid Silburyhill. • Roman roads cut through Bronze Age disc barrows. • Bluestone flakes were found in burials near stonehenge and reasoned that the interments were contemporary with the monument. • Stuckeley’s daughter dated the White Horse to pre-Roman based on similarities of the design to pre-Roman British coins. • Together with Edmond Halley they attempted to date stonehenge based on astronomical alignments

  6. Influenced by rationalism, antiquaires began developing approaches to document and date prehistoric remains. • Erik Pontoppidan (1744), Danish, recognized stratigraphy in burial mounds and ordered the interments in time. • Pierre Legrandd’Aussy (1737-1800) proposed a six period classification scheme from ancient to Middle Ages.

More Related