1 / 12

Session 2

Session 2 The actual implementation of the EU Framework agreement in the different countries/sectors Stefan Clauwaert ETUC NETLEX Coordinator/ETUI-REHS Senior Researcher. ETUC Project Final Conference Prague 21-22 September 2006. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement. Sources:

sderr
Télécharger la présentation

Session 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session 2 The actual implementation of the EU Framework agreement in the different countries/sectors Stefan Clauwaert ETUC NETLEX Coordinator/ETUI-REHS SeniorResearcher ETUC Project Final Conference Prague 21-22 September 2006

  2. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • Sources: • Implementation fiches of affiliates • Joint implementation report SDC 28/06/2006 • Reports 3 regional meetings project • Riga/ Budapest/Brussels • Other input by affiliates

  3. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • General: • Only few countries described the “practices and procedures specific to management and labour and member states” (Art. 139 §2) • Collective bargaining: BE, FR, ES, SW • Law: CZ (as basis for more favourable CA) • Tripartite Council: LT • No real specific procedure but changes to law most logic: EE • Problem in identifying the “specific procedure”: SK • Is nevertheless crucial information!!!

  4. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • Implementation via Collective Bargaining: National level • BE: interprof CA n° 72 of 30/3/1999 (extended by RD of 21/6/1999) • ES: EU text annexed to ANC 2005 (recommendation for lower level CB- no results yet) • SE: national CA for local/regions authorities (04/2005) • FR: negotiations on “penabilité au travail” – include WRS – negotiations failed • Initiatives started/foreseen: • BG: proposal to national council “Conditions at work” to elaborate “Common strategy/decision/proposal” • SLO: via national tripartite council – Working group Oct 2005- draft CA prepared by ZSSS – refused by employers • RO: start negotiations on National CA 2007 – September 2007 • CY: invitations send to employers – no reaction so far • FI: negotiations started February 2006 – no final result yet • Iceland: started and end result was hoped to be reached by end June 2006 – result?

  5. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • Implementation via Collective Bargaining: sectoral/regional level • DK: CA for state sector authorities (spring 2005) • DK: CA for local and regional authorities (spring 2005) – further negotiations foreseen to start in October 2007 • ES: No real results yet as follow up to ANC 2005; several CA’s dealing with WRS but not really “triggered by EU agreement”: • National wide sectoral CA telemarketing (2004-2006) • National wide sectoral CA chemical sector (2004-2006) • Provincial CA for hotel sector in Tenerife (2005-2008) • Provincial CA for casinos in Allicante (2006-2009) • MT: foreseen for next CB round as current CA’s are valid until 2007

  6. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • Implementation via Collective Bargaining: enterprise level • DE: most likely level; as H&S aspects are tradionally not settle via CA’s on higher levels • AT: main objective is to get it implemented on this level • ES: Codorniu – Sant Sadurni; but not directly triggered by EU agreement

  7. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • Implementation via Legislation: • Existing: • BG: Act on Health and Safety Working Conditions 1997 • MT: Act XXVII of 2000 • PT: Constitution, Penal Code, Labour Code (art. 18 & 24) • NO: Working Environment Act covers “most” aspects of EU agreement; considered as satisfactory basis

  8. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • Implementation via Legislation: • New legislation: • CZ: new Labour Code of 21/04/2006 via Law 262/0226 Coll., Chapter I article 102 (in force as from 1/1/2007) • SK: partial implementation via • New Law OHS nr 124/2006 Z.z. • New Health Law nr 126/2006 Z.z. • Partially also via amendments to Labour Code • SLO: proposals for amendments by ZSSS to regulate criteria for OHS services licences for risk assessments on WRS – no reaction yet • EE: proposed amendments to Occupational H&S Act – adding WRS to list of health risk factors – refuses under pretext that it was already covered

  9. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • Implementation via Legislation: • Needed: BE for public sector • Hoped for: • PT: use revision of national list of occupational health illnesses to add WRS • RO: amendments to H & S law • Problem: • SW: Swedish Work Environment Authority uses EU agreement as argument for not issuing new provisions on social and psychological conditions at work – Serious set back for trade unions

  10. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • Other forms/instruments of implementation: • BE: as national CA was not really used in practice; brochure of National Labour Council on how to use in practice • SLO: proposal to national economic council to translate Copenhagen Questionnaire into Slovenian • MT: joint interprofessional Declaration of Commitment • NL: update of national Declaration on WRS in line with EU agreement • SW: joint interprofessional agreements both for private (16/6/2005) and public sector (spring 2006) including translation of EU agreement and recommendations to lower CB levels to use it as guideline

  11. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • Other forms/instruments of implementation (continued): • IRE: changes foreseen to Code of Practice • LV: interprofessional agreement LBAS/LDDK prescribing next steps in implementation • UK: interprofessional guide by CBI, CEEP UK, Forum of Private Business and TUC in cooperation with governmental agencies such as Health and Safety Executive and DTI • AT: • joint interprofessional guidelines – near adoption • These will also be signed up to by Austrian Chamber of Agriculture to make them applicable in concerned sector • EU sectoral social dialogue: • Electricity: Joint Declaration Eurelectric/EPSU/EMCEF (15/12/2004) • Construction: Joint Statement FIEC/EFBWW (10/06/2006) • Cleaning: at SDC of October 2004 commitment to do annual review on implementation

  12. ETUC Project Implementation WRS agreement • BUT…: problems identified • BE: no real minutes of EU social dialogue negotiations available as well as no joint interpretation guide • Several countries: no real interest by employers; are afraid of the costs! • SLO: • Fear of employers that WRS will be put on list of occupational illnesses – damage claims by workers • No OHS services with adequate know how on WRS • Several countries: most companies are SME’s • Several countries: no decently functioning SD mechanisms

More Related