Diversity: Strengthening Outreach Efforts. Bev Watford Associate Dean, Academic Affairs Director, Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity. Some Generalizations. Most higher education institutions are similar within groups Public versus private Undergraduate, graduateBy katen
View Nsf review criterion PowerPoint (PPT) presentations online in SlideServe. SlideServe has a very huge collection of Nsf review criterion PowerPoint presentations. You can view or download Nsf review criterion presentations for your school assignment or business presentation. Browse for the presentations on every topic that you want.
Understanding NSF Broader Impact Criterion. Samir Khuller Dept. of Computer Science Univ. of Maryland firstname.lastname@example.org. NSF’s Review Criteria. Intellectual Merit – “How well does the proposed research advance the field” --well understood.
INNOVATION REVIEW CRITERION. David Armstrong, Ph.D. Chief, Review Branch National Institute of Mental Health National Institutes of Health SEPTEMBER 26, 2005. AGENDA ITEMS. DEFINE INNOVATION NIH EFFORTS TO PROMOTE RECEIPT AND REVIEW OF INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS (e.g., R21, RFAs/PAs)
Criterion. A standard of judgement or criticism. C hronometer . A time piece with a mechanism to adjust for acurracy . C ircuit . T he act of going or moving around;. C ircumambulate . T o walk about or around;. Circuitous. roundabout. Precise . D efinitely stated or defined;.
NSF Review of Milagro. July 18-19 Los Alamos, NM. What is Being Reviewed. NSF – How long to continue to operate? 1 or 2 more years Option 1 means using last year of operations funding for D&D Us – General review of technique Includes view of our accomplishments View of our future
NSF Merit Review Process. NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO. Hosted by: Washington University. Jody Chase Program Director, EHR email@example.com (703) 292-8682 Lloyd Douglas Program Director, MPS firstname.lastname@example.org (703) 292-4862 Vanessa Richardson
Criterion. The Basis for Judgment or Evaluation. How Criteria Are Often Established. Personal value system of Scientist Availability Preference of person in authority Based on naive view of task. A More Effective Way to Establish Criteria. Conduct job analysis
DOE/NSF Review of DES. 2 Science (SC1) Andy Albrecht (UC Davis) & Nicholas Suntzeff (Texas A&M) 2.2 Findings and Comments
NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective. QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan State University. My Experience. Academic Preparation Post-doc experience Have reviewed for USEd, NIH, NSF and EPA
The NSF Merit Review Process. NSF Workshop for Sponsored Project Administrators at Hispanic Serving Institutions April 13, 2007 - Miami, FL April 20, 2007 – Albuquerque, NM. Ask Early, Ask Often!!. Outline. Proposal review criteria. NSF peer review process.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?. How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields?