'Universal affirmative' diaporamas de présentation

Chapter 5

Chapter 5. Categorical Propositions. 1. A deductive argument is one that claims to establish its conclusion conclusively. A valid deductive argument is one in which, if all the premises are true, the conclusion must be true .

1.41k views • 72 slides

CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8

CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8. DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS DEFINITION: A DECLARATIVE SENTENCE IN WHICH SUBJECT TERM AND PREDICATE TERM ARE RELATED AS CATEGORIES.

432 views • 28 slides

More About Syllogisms

More About Syllogisms. The quantifiers, causes, and validity of Syllogisms. Quantifiers. We have already learned about the universal affirmative . a = All S are P Example: All humans are mortal. As we discussed last week, there are three more. Quantifiers. The Universal Negative:

362 views • 12 slides

4 Categorical Propositions

357 views • 9 slides

Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions

Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141). Review of deductive arguments Form Valid/Invalid Soundness Categorical syllogisms concern relations among classes. They were first discussed by Aristotle (384-322 BCE). Categorical Propositions (pp. 142-144).

225 views • 5 slides