1 / 19

Russian pension reform in a comparative perspective

Russian pension reform in a comparative perspective. Oxana Sinyavskaya (Independent Institute for Social Policy, Moscow) Joint AARP – European Centre Conference “ Re-Inventing Retirement. Reshaping Health & Financial Security for the EU 27 and Eastern Europe ”. Outline of the presentation.

semah
Télécharger la présentation

Russian pension reform in a comparative perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Russian pension reform in a comparative perspective Oxana Sinyavskaya (Independent Institute for Social Policy, Moscow) Joint AARP – European Centre Conference “Re-Inventing Retirement. Reshaping Health & Financial Security for the EU 27 and Eastern Europe” October 22-25, 2008

  2. Outline of the presentation • General background • Evolution of Russian pension reform model • Current design of Russian pension reform • Second order problems and further modifications of the legislation • Future perspectives October 22-25, 2008

  3. General background: Russian population is ageing rapidly World Bank: Health, Nutrition and Population Summary Profile, Demographic Projections October 22-25, 2008

  4. General background: … but life expectancy remains very low Life expectancy at birth – MPIDR Human Mortality Database, Aug.-2007 October 22-25, 2008

  5. General background:Peculiarities of Russia’s Economic Transition • Relatively stable employment (low unemployment) • But extremely low wage + wage arrears Statistics October 22-25, 2008

  6. On the eve of reform Financial crisis of 1998 Economic growth from 1999 Budget surplus from 2000 Declining inflation (18.6% in 2001) Increasing inequality: Gini coefficients – incomes = 0.397; wages = 0.508 Declining unemployment (8.8% in 2001) Pension arrears – paid back in 2000 2007-2008 Economic growth - stable but – because of high energy prices Budget surplus kept but promises are increasing Rising inflation – 9% (2006), 11.9% (2007), 14-15% (expected in 2008) Inequality – still high, growing? Official poverty rates – 2 times less Unemployment – moderate decline (5.3% in Aug.-2008) High volatility of financial markets General background: Economic situation on the eve of reform and now October 22-25, 2008

  7. Soviet era DB PAYG Separate systems for state workers & clerks, and collective farmers Inactive groups, self-employed and some special professional gr. – not covered CR = 4-11%, employer Age – 55 (f), 60 (m) A lot of special rules for different occupations permitted to retire earlier “Personal” pensions Benefit = 55% of ind.wage/salary No indexation + maximum limited Law 1990 DB PAYG Coverage – all population Social pensions for those ever not been employed CR = 28% (employer)+1% (employee) Age – 55 (f), 60 (m) The same occupational privileges Special system for federal employees The same rules for benefit formula Price indexation Starting point: Basic facts of Russian pension regulation October 22-25, 2008

  8. Expansion of early retirement provisions Difficult schemes of pension benefit indexation/compensation Two benefit formulas since 1998 Low compliance PFR deficit Pension arrears But: Wide coverage High income inequality High people expectations Changes and challenges of 1990s October 22-25, 2008

  9. Evolution of Russian pension reform models – the role of international experience “Multi-pillar” cover but what is inside? • 1995 – the concept of the reform of the pension system (“rationalization”, continental Europe fancy) • New: voluntary occupational and individual private pensions • 1997 – proposal of the pension reform developed by the Ministry of Labor and Social Development (Chilean pension reform inspiration) • New: mandatory fully-funded system + means-tested for not-insured • 1998 – the program of the pension reform – a compromise between 1 & 2 (lesson-drawing from Polish and Swedish pension reforms) • New: notional accounts • 2002 – ongoing pension reform – a set of laws of 2001-2002 • New: state ownership on mandatory pension savings, state managing company by default, no employee contributions, fixed denominator (modification of NDC) October 22-25, 2008

  10. “Pillars” of new Russian pension system Coverage Eligibility Sources of financing October 22-25, 2008

  11. Declared aims of the pension reform • Direct • To strengthen of link between contributions and pensions • To increase real pension benefits • To sustain financial balance of the pension system • Indirect • To involve people’s saving into investment process October 22-25, 2008

  12. Second order problems: poverty levels of pensioners – low… October 22-25, 2008 NOBUS data, 2003

  13. Second-order problems: … but average pension decreases relative to average wage Statistics October 22-25, 2008

  14. Second-order problems: … and benefits become more flat and less dependent on the wage history Structure of average old-age labor pension 2007? Statistics October 22-25, 2008

  15. Second-order problems: working-able people do not know about pension reform • … and absolute majority prefers to keep pension savings in the default state company Special pension module of Rus-GGS-2007 October 22-25, 2008

  16. Tax reform – Unified Social Tax reduction Maximum rate – 20% instead of 28% Regressive scale with fixed thresholds Additional indexation of basic parts of pensions – a response to social benefits reform and elections Aim – social pension = pensioners’ poverty level by the end of 2009 Development of funded component of pension system: 3-6% of wages of people born after 1966– now: about 40-50% of total contributors Second-order problems: current deficit of Pension Fund budget because of … • Immediate solutions: • Federal budget transfer to the Pension fund • People born in 1952/1957-1966 excluded from the funded pillar from 2005 October 22-25, 2008

  17. New attempts to “reform” the pension reform • Focus – on the current pensioners  to prevent poverty • State support of voluntary pension savings added to the mandatory ones • Long-term sustainability of the pension system? • Looking-for new sources of financing the transition period October 22-25, 2008

  18. Conclusions • Any goal of the pension reform has not been achieved yet. Economic growth as an obstacle to the pension reform? • Difficulties in implementing “unpopular” steps • Current pensioners lost but will the future pensioners win? Effect of the international financial crisis • How to learn by other countries’ mistakes? Details matter in transferring other models October 22-25, 2008

  19. Thank you for your attention! October 22-25, 2008

More Related