130 likes | 254 Vues
This presentation outlines strategies for optimizing contributions to various working groups within the water sector. It highlights key forums such as the Joint Water Sector Review and various Technical Working Groups (TWGs), while addressing the current challenges of inconsistent representation and poor communication. Proposed solutions include appointing lead and co-lead representatives for each working group to improve engagement and coordination among Development Partner Groups (DPG). By fostering consistent participation and clear communication, we can enhance the effectiveness of our contributions and initiatives in the sector.
E N D
DP Engagement with Working Groups How can we make our contributions more effective? DPG Retreat – March 6, 2008
Outline of Presentation • Which working groups are we talking about? • What are the challenges we are currently facing? • What can we do about them?
Which working groups are we talking about - I • Key Fora in Water Sector Dialogue: • Joint Water Sector Review • Water Sector Working Group • TWG: Planning and Finance • TWG: Performance Monitoring • TWG: Institutional Development and Capacity Building • TWG: Sanitation and Hygiene
Which working groups are we talking about - II • Groups outside the Water Sector: • Sanitation and Hygiene Steering Committee (MoHSW) • Local Government Capital Development Grant Technical Committee • MKUKUTA Cluster 2 Working Group • Wider DPG Meetings
Current Challenges • Inconsistent representation of DPG at WGs: • slows progress in WGs – covering the same ground at each meeting • meetings do not build on progress at previous meetings • inconsistent messages • undermines requests for consistent, high-level representation (and leadership) from partners
Current Challenges • Inconsistent representation of DPG at WGs • Poor communications between WG meetings • no clear point of contact for WG chairs among DPs • no DP mandated to follow up / chase
Current Challenges • Inconsistent representation of DPG at WGs • Poor communications between WG meetings • Slow progress on tasks between meetings • many sub-groups formed, little to show for it • low commitment on all sides to sub-group tasks
Current Challenges • Inconsistent representation of DPG at WGs • Poor communications between WG meetings • Slow progress on tasks between meetings • Late notice of meetings / cancellations, no clear calendar, etc. • an important challenge, but to be addressed elsewhere (Nat) • we can help reduce the problem
Proposed Representation of DPG Water in Working Groups • One lead representative of the DPG to be selected for each working group • Supported by a co-lead • All DPG members of WGs to commit to attending regularly and taking on tasks relating to the work of the WG – i.e. members are either in and committed or should not be members • How many other members?
Proposed role of lead and co-lead • Liaise with PCT on meeting logistics (e.g. timing, venues, invitations, circulation of documents, etc.) • Review and provide input on meeting agenda • Review and provide input on draft minutes • Provide guidance on longer-term agenda for the group – what needs to be achieved over the year? • Attend meetings • Ensure either lead / co-lead is present at each meeting • Coordinate DPG contributions to work of the TWG (e.g. sub-groups) between meetings • Provide a link between the WG and DPG-W, including updates on progress and gathering other DPs’ inputs
Proposed role of other DPG members • Provide input to lead/co-lead on agenda and minutes • Attend meetings • Contribute to the work of the TWG between meetings