1 / 56

Technology Enhanced Education: Opportunities and Challenges

Technology Enhanced Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Chuck Dziuban Patsy Moskal University of Central Florida. The University of Central Florida. A value-added model of technology-enhanced learning. Learning Management Systems. Fully Online (W). Technology Augmented (E).

Télécharger la présentation

Technology Enhanced Education: Opportunities and Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technology Enhanced Education: Opportunities and Challenges Chuck Dziuban Patsy Moskal University of Central Florida

  2. The University of Central Florida

  3. A value-added model of technology-enhanced learning Learning Management Systems Fully Online (W) Technology Augmented (E) Blended (M) Access and Transformation Lecture Capture Engagement Enhancement FacultyInitiative Institutional Initiative Web 2.0

  4. Technology Enhanced Learning as a Boundary Object Evaluators Journalists Presidents Students Vice Provosts Faculty TEL Deans Provosts CIOs Department Chairs Librarians InstructionalDesigners

  5. Shirky, C. (2009)

  6. An Evaluation Plan

  7. Distributed Learning Impact Evaluation Faculty Students Online programs Success Writing project model Satisfaction Demographic profiles Retention Higher order evaluation models Reactive behavior patterns Strategies for success Theater Student evaluation of instruction Information fluency Generational comparisons Large online classes

  8. Student Success

  9. Online and Blended Registrations Fully Online Courses Blended Learning Courses n

  10. Learning Return on Investment • 67% more efficient classroom use • Saved $6.2 million in construction costs • Saved $316,000 in space maintenance costs Joel Hartman, 2010

  11. Success rates by modalitySpring 01 through Spring 03 F2F Total N= 139,444 students Blended Fully Online Percent

  12. A Decision Tree for Success Overall 85.9% n=11,286 Arts & Sciences, Business Admin., Hospitality Mgmt. Health & Pub. Affairs Engineering Education 85.8% n=6,460 72.7% n=378 91.5% n=2,079 86.7% n=2,369 F2F, E, M W F2F E, M, W F2F E, M 89.1% n=1,043 79.6% n=230 94.1% n=1,036 64.7% n=148 74.8% n=821 86.5% n=5,639 females males A&S BA & Hosp. mgmt E=Enhanced M=Blended W=Online 84.1% n=2,376 78.5% n=526 88.4% n=3,263 68.9% n=298

  13. Where have all the face-to-face courses gone?

  14. Overall success rates by modality Blended (N=49,434) Online (N=102,755) Percent

  15. Success rates by modality for Sciences Blended (N= 6,731) Online (N= 22,301) Percent

  16. Success rates by modality for Health & Public Affairs Blended (N= 7,716) Online (N= 42,366) Percent

  17. Success rates by modality for Education (N= 7,479) Blended Online (N=10,078) Percent

  18. Predictors

  19. Prediction Domains Domains Dependent Demographics Success & Withdrawal Ability Academic Performance

  20. Relationship of online success and withdrawal with demographics Success (r2 = .02) Withdrawal (r2 = .01) N range = 69,000 – 133,000

  21. Relationship of online success and withdrawal with SAT and ACT scores Success (r2 = .01) Withdrawal (r2 = .01) N range = 69,000 – 133,000

  22. Relationship of Online Success and Withdrawal with GPA Success (r2 = 0.37) Withdrawal (r2 = .04) N range = 69,000 – 133,000

  23. Student Satisfaction

  24. Student satisfaction in fully online and blended courses Fully online (N = 1,526) Blended (N = 485) 44% 41% 39% Percent 38% 11% 9% 9% 5% 3% 1% Very Satisfied Neutral Very Unsatisfied Satisfied Unsatisfied

  25. Student satisfaction with online learning • Convenience • Reduced Logistic Demands • Increased Learning Flexibility • Technology Enhanced Learning Reduced Opportunity Costs for Education

  26. Students’ problems with online learning • Reduced Face-to-Face Time • Technology Problems • Reduced Instructor Assistance • Overwhelming • Increased Workload Increased Opportunity Costs for Education

  27. The Ambivalence Dimension Ambivalence Satisfaction Dissatisfaction

  28. Sources of Ambivalence Change Complexity ? Incompleteness Ambiguity Pluralism Uncertainty

  29. Derived Model Yields 8 Dimensions of Student Perception of ALN Ambiguity Ambivalence Information Fluency Engagement Commitment Responsiveness Expectations

  30. Web 2.0

  31. DisruptiveInnovation! There’s one in YOUR future!! And another one right behind it! Wayne Hodgins, 2007

  32. Web 2.0 Audio Facebook Semantic Web Wikis SlideShare Ajax Digg Technorati Zude Del.ico.us Skype YouTube Pandora tagging XHTML Flickr Blogs Wikipedia RSS Social Networking Podcasting MySpace Video Folksonomy

  33. The Generations

  34. Some characteristics of the generations Matures (prior to 1946) Dedicated to a job they take on Respectful of authority Place duty before pleasure Baby boomers (1946-1964) Live to work Generally optimistic Influence on policy & products • Generation X (1965-1980) • Work to live • Clear & consistent expectations • Value contributing to the whole • Millennials (1981-1994) • Live in the moment • Expect immediacy of technology • Earn money for immediate consumption

  35. Net Generation: Marc Prensky – Learning Preferences Multitasking Twitch Speed Active Learning Graphics Connections Technology is my Friend Gaming and Fantasy

  36. Net Generation: Howe and Strauss – Lifestyle Sheltered Conventional Confident Special Team Oriented Achievement Pressure

  37. Tabscott: Net Generation Norms freedom scrutinize personalize customize speed play collaborate integrity

  38. Net Generation: Twenge (Generation Me) – Lifestyle Self Focused Artificial Self Esteem Cynical Anything is Possible (unrealistic) Yeah Right Life by Lottery

  39. Students who were satisfied by generation (non ambivalent) 55% Percent 38% 26% Boomer 1946-1964 n=328 Generation X 1965-1980 n=815 Millennial 1981-1994 n=346

  40. Because of the web I changed my approach to learning (non ambivalent) 51% Percent 37% 23% Boomer 1946-1964 n=328 Generation X 1965-1980 n=815 Millennial 1981-1994 n=346

  41. Classroom modality preferred by generations Baby Boomer p = .000 Gen X Millennial 65% 59% 40% 39% 26% 24% 22% 15% 11% n= 1,149

  42. Students’ description of whether they learn better alone or with others Baby Boomer p= .000 Gen-X Millennial n= 1,149

  43. Student and faculty generations in blended and online learning Faculty Student Mature 1% Millennial 1% Baby Boomer 6% Mature 11% Gen X 33% Gen X 11% Baby Boomer 55% Millennial 84% N=689 N=26,823

  44. Student Ratings

  45. A decision rule for the probability of faculty member receiving an overall rating of Excellent (n=1,280,890) If... Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Facilitation of learning Communication of ideas Respect and concern for students Then... The probability of an overall rating of Excellent = .97 & The probability of an overall rating of Fair or Poor =.00

  46. A decision rule for the probability of faculty member receiving an overall rating of Poor (n=1,280,890) If... Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Facilitation of learning Communication of ideas Respect and concern for students Then... The probability of an overall rating of Poor = .90 & The probability of an overall rating of Very Good or Excellent =.00

  47. A comparison of excellent ratings by college unadjusted and adjusted for instructors satisfying Rule 1 (n=1,280,890) Overall If Rule 1 College % Excellent % Excellent Education 58.6 97.9 Molecular & Microbiology 49.9 97.6 Health & Public Affairs 49.8 97.6 Arts & Humanities 49.1 96.7 Arts & Sciences 45.1 97.0 Sciences 44.5 96.8 Hospitality Management 44.1 96.6 Business Administration 39.5 96.9 Engineering 39.0 96.8

  48. A comparison of excellent ratings by course modality--unadjusted and adjusted for instructors satisfying Rule 1 (n=1,171,664) Course Overall If Rule 1 Modality % Excellent % Excellent Blended 48.9 97.2 Online 47.6 97.3 Enhanced 46.8 97.5 F2F 45.7 97.2 ITV 34.2 96.6

  49. Technology Enhanced Education, Ghost Maps and Black Swans

  50. Bone Pickers Sewer Hunters Rag-Gatherers Night Soil Men Pure Finders Dustmen Dredgermen Bunters Mud-Larks Toshers London 1853

More Related