1 / 14

The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

EVALUATION OF ROLE OF PCR IN DIAGNOSIS OF HERPETIC STROMAL KERATITIS & ENDOTHELIITIS AND CORRELATION WITH CLINICAL OUTCOME . Radhika Tandon , MD, DNB, FRCS, FRCOphth. Dr. Manoj Sharma, MD Dr. Bhavna Chawla , MS Dr Namrata Sharma, MD Prof. Jeewan.S.Titiyal , MD

shanta
Télécharger la présentation

The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EVALUATION OF ROLE OF PCR IN DIAGNOSIS OF HERPETIC STROMAL KERATITIS & ENDOTHELIITIS AND CORRELATION WITH CLINICAL OUTCOME Radhika Tandon, MD, DNB, FRCS, FRCOphth Dr. Manoj Sharma, MD Dr. BhavnaChawla, MS Dr Namrata Sharma, MD Prof. Jeewan.S.Titiyal, MD Prof. GitaSatpathy, MD* Department of Cornea, Cataract & Refractive Surgery and *Ocular Microbiology Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre For Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

  2. Table 1- Shedding of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) DNA in active stromal keratitis and / or endotheliitis, as detected by polymerase chain reaction analysis of tear samples obtained from different method *Data are the total no. of subjects with shedding of HSV-1 DNA/total no. of subjects assessed (percentage of patients with shedding of HSV-1 DNA).

  3. AIM • To evaluate the role of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in confirmation of diagnosis of clinically suspected Herpetic stromal keratitis or endotheliitis in tear samples • To evaluate the effect of antiviral therapy on test result.

  4. PATIENTS • Inclusion criteria • Clinically diagnosed cases of active stromal keratitis and endotheliitis • Exclusion criteria • Pure epithelial keratitis with no stromal involvement • H/o previous oral acyclovir use within one month

  5. Study Design • Study group: 66 eyes( 59 patients) • 52 Unilateral & 7 Bilateral affected • Control group: 130 eyes of 90 patients • Contra lateral eye of 50* unilateral affected patients • Both eyes of 40 normal volunteers • *2 patients had contralateralphthisis bulbi and sample from phthisical eye was not taken

  6. Laboratory Diagnosis • Before starting treatment, tear samples from both eyes of patients were collected by fire polished microcapillary tube and subjected to PCR for HSV DNA detection • PCR Protocol • DNA extraction: commercial QI Amp DNA blood kit • Polymerase chain reaction • Primer-111 bp region of HSV 1 thymidine kinase gene (Hofgartner W T et. al Clinical chemistry, 1999) • Amplification- thermal cycler • (Gene Amp PCR system 9700, applied biosystem, USA) • Electrophoreses- in 2% agarose gel

  7. Treatment • Tab acyclovir 400 mg (5 times/day) × 7 day • Tab acyclovir 400 mg (BD) × 6 months • Topical steroid (1% prednisolone acetate) Adjunct therapy was given as required • Topical antibiotic • Topical mydriatic (2% homide) • Topical lubricant (preservative free) • Analgesics( if required)

  8. Follow up examination was done Day 2, day 3-6, day-12, day 13-17, day 18-22 & at 3 mths • Repeat PCR was done 3 months after initiating treatment

  9. Results Figure 1: Distribution of tear samples from various clinical categories PUK=Peripheral ulcerative keratitis A= active Q= quiescent P= with perforation V= virus

  10. Figure 2: PCR result in different clinical categories PUK=Peripheral ulcerative keratitis A= active Q= quiescent P= with perforation V= virus

  11. Figure 3: PCR result in tear samples at presentation and at 3 months FPCR= PCR at follow-up (at 3 month from initiation of treatment)

  12. PCR Negative Positive 13 (20%) • (Active) • Stromal keratitis 8/30(26%) • Necrotizing keratitis 1/3 (33%) • Keratouveitis 2/11 (22%) • Endotheliitis 2/9 (22%) • Necrotizing keratitis with perforation (0/6) • Recurrence in Graft (0/1) • Quiescent stromal keratitis (0/3) Control sample

  13. Conclusion • 20% cases of active Herpetic stromal keratitis and endotheliitis had positive tear sample PCR test result. All positive cases showed good response to treatment and no HSV DNA was detected after antiviral therapy • Positive PCR test result can therefore be used as a marker of active viral replication in cases of active stromal keratitis & endotheliitis

  14. Address for Correspondence : • Professor Radhika Tandon (radhika_tan@yahoo.com) • Dr. RP Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029

More Related