1 / 21

The Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States. Unit 16. LEGAL BASIS for the power of the Supreme Court. Constitution , Article III, Section I

sharrington
Télécharger la présentation

The Supreme Court of the United States

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Supreme Court of the United States Unit 16

  2. LEGAL BASIS for thepoweroftheSupreme Court Constitution, Article III, Section I Thejudicialpowerofthe United Statesshallbevestedin one Supreme Court, andinsuchinferiorcourts as theCongressmayfrom time to time ordainandestablish.

  3. Function and structure of the Supreme Court FUNCTION • thehighestjudicialbodyintheUnited States • leadsthefederaljudiciary. MEMBERS • theChiefJusticeofthe United States + currentlyeightAssociateJustices (number of Associate Justices may be fixed by Congress) NOMINATION • bythePresidentandconfirmedwiththe "adviceandconsent" oftheSenate. • Justicesserve "duringgoodbehaviour”, whichterminates • - death, - retirement, - resignation, - conviction on impeachment.

  4. Dutiesandrightsofjudges Constitution, Article III, Section I "[t]he Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office."

  5. The Court meetsinWashington, D.C.intheUnited StatesSupreme Court building. TheSupreme Court isprimarilyanappellatecourt, but hasoriginal jurisdictionina smallnumberofcases.

  6. Federalcourt system U.S. Supreme Court making an appeal U.S. CourtsofAppeals 13 courtsofappealbelowtheSupreme Court U.S. DistrictCourts 94 districtleveltrialcourts making an appeal

  7. Judgeship Appointments By President • Supreme Court justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges are • nominated by the President • and confirmed by the United States Senate, as stated in the Constitution. 

  8. Hierarchyofstatecourts PARALLEL COURTS Federalcourts for disputesarising underfederallaworlawsuits betweenpersonsresidingin differentsates U.S. Supreme Court State Supreme Court STATE COURTS ARE NOT SUBORDINATE TO FEDERAL COURTS! – CONCURRENT AND OFTEN OVERLAPPING JURISDICTION State Courts of Appeal State general trial courts making an appeal A vast majority of cases are handled in state courts.

  9. TypesofcasesbeforetheSupreme Court • CASES IN APPEAL PROCEDURE (the SC hastheauthority to review the decisions of lower courts) • ORIGINAL CASES (ofgreatsignificance) - litigants for which no othercourtis competent (one stateagainstanother) - a stateincollisionwiththefederal government

  10. The Court and its Procedures • the first Monday in October- aTerm of the Supreme Court begins • usually Court sessions continue until late June or early July(summer -judges continue to analyze new petitions for review, consider motions and applications, and must make preparations for cases scheduled for fall argument) • The Term is divided between "sittings," (Justices hear cases and deliver opinions), and intervening "recesses," (studythearguedand andforthcomingcases +write opinions). • Sittings and recesses alternate at approximately two-week intervals

  11. up to 24 cases may be argued at one sitting (majority of cases involve the review of a decision of some other court) • no jury and no witnesses are heard. For each case • the Court has before it a record of prior proceedings and printed briefs containing the arguments of each side • Each week the Justices must also evaluate more than 130 petitions seeking review of judgments of state and federal courts to determine which cases are to be granted full review with oral arguments by attorneys.

  12. ExpressionsfromtheUnit 16 • major nationalissue • manycasesreachthecourt • precedantsbinding on otherjudges • to sortthroughthefloodofcases • to beacteduponon themerits • to writememorandaaboutcases • flag a case as important • stateincollisionwithfederalgovernment • caseisturnedawaywithoutaction • a casecanbewronglydecided • thefirsttrial plus anappeal • to hearfourcases a day

  13. A LandmarkcaseoftheSupreme CourtMiranda v. Arizona • Readthefollowingcasebackgroundanddecidewhichcourtinstanceswereinvolved. Ernesto Miranda, a Mexican immigrant living in Phoenix, Arizona, was identified in a police lineup by a woman, who accused him of kidnapping and raping her. Miranda was arrested and questioned by the police for two hours until he confessed to the crimes. During the interrogation, police did not tell Miranda about his right to an attorney. Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination or his Sixth Amendment

  14. A LandmarkcaseoftheSupreme CourtMiranda v. Arizona • casebackground– PART II The case went to trial in an Arizona state court and the prosecutor used the confession as evidence against Miranda, who was convicted and sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison. Miranda's attorney appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, which upheld the conviction. Then he appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which agreed to hear it along with four similar cases. In taking the case, the Court had to determine the role police have in protecting the rights of the accused guaranteed by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

  15. DecisionoftheSupreme Court • Theaccusedwas not advised of his rights to counsel and to remain silent. • The Supreme Court agreed, holding that police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning. This decision gave rise to what has become known as the Miranda Warning.

  16. The Miranda Warning „You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?”

  17. Miranda v. Arizona – anexampleofappeal procedure • Parties not satisfied with the decision of a lower court must petition (PETITIONER) the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case. • The primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari.* This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. n. (sersh-oh-rare-ee) a writ (order) of a higher court to a lower court to send all the documents in a case to it so the higher court can review the lower court's decision.

  18. Theobligationofthe SC • not under any obligation to hear these cases • only does so if the case could have national significance, might harmonize conflicting decisions in the federal Circuit courts, and/or could have precedential value. (The Court accepts 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.) • hears cases that have been decided in either an appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest Court in a given state (if the state court decided a Constitutional issue).

  19. Possibleoutcomesofthepetition for WritofCertiorari • - 2 options: A) Writ of Certiorari - decision by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court – if granted • brief about the merit of the case must be submitted , • oral arguments heard, • decisions reached by a majority vote (decisions reached by the end of the courts term) B) Cert. Denied - abbreviation used in legal citations to indicate that the Supreme Court denied a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the case being cited.

  20. Vocabularypractice Complete the following definitions with appropriate legal terms. ............................... - a party to a lawsuit. ………………………… - decision by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court. …………………………. - the power of a court to hear and enter judgment upon a case brought for review. …………………………. - the ability and authority of a court to decide cases based on hearing testimony and viewing evidence, rather than on appeal. ………………………….. – authority of a court to invalidate legislation or executive actions which, in the Court’ s considered judgment, conflict with the Constitution. …………………………… - the head of the United States federal court system and the president of the Supreme Court.

  21. Vocabulary practice - Key Complete the following definitions with appropriate legal terms. LITIGANT- a party to a lawsuit. WRIT OF CERTIORARY - decision by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court. APPELATE JURISDICTION- the power of a court to hear and enter judgment upon a case brought for review. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION- the ability and authority of a court to decide cases based on hearing testimony and viewing evidence, rather than on appeal. JUDICIALREVIEW – authority of a court to invalidate legislation or executive actions which, in the Court’ s considered judgment, conflict with the Constitution. CHIEF JUSTICE- the head of the United States federal court system and the president of the Supreme Court.

More Related