1 / 15

American Educational Research Association March 25, 2008 Gary L. Williamson, Ph.D.

North Carolina’s NCLB Pilot Growth Model A Two-Year Review. American Educational Research Association March 25, 2008 Gary L. Williamson, Ph.D. Accountability Services Division. In the Beginning …. USED request for proposals in the 2005-06 school year

shelby
Télécharger la présentation

American Educational Research Association March 25, 2008 Gary L. Williamson, Ph.D.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. North Carolina’sNCLB Pilot Growth Model A Two-Year Review American Educational Research Association March 25, 2008 Gary L. Williamson, Ph.D. Accountability Services Division

  2. In the Beginning … • USED request for proposals in the 2005-06 school year • Estimated 40 schools would have benefited in 2004-05 • However, did not apply USED imposed constraints 2

  3. Basics of NC Growth Model for AYP • Use difference between initial test score and proficiency score three years later to set trajectory (Note – this is different from growth method used for ABCs.) • Student must be proficient within four years in state-tested grades 3

  4. Basics of NC AYP Growth Model 4

  5. Statewide AYP Results2005-06 School Year • 2,300+ Schools, 115 LEAs • Approximately 45% schools made AYP • 299 schools in Title I School Improvement for 2006-07 • 64 LEAs in District Improvement for 2006-07 5

  6. Results of NC Pilot2005-06 School Year • NO school went from not making AYP to making AYP based on growth model 6

  7. Results of NC Pilot2005-06 School Year • Four schools each had one subgroup meet a proficiency target based on the growth model • Economically Disadvantaged Students met the reading target in two schools • “All students” group met the reading target (in one school) and the math target (in one school) 7

  8. Statewide AYP Results2006-07 School Year • 2,350+ Schools, 115 LEAs • Approximately 45% schools made AYP • 456 schools in Title I School Improvement for 2006-07 • 60 LEAs in District Improvement for 2006-07 8

  9. Results of NC Pilot2006-07 School Year • 12 schools went from not making AYP to making AYP based on growth model 9

  10. Results of NC Pilot2006-07 School Year • 10 of the 12 schools also used safe harbor and/or confidence interval in addition to growth model 10

  11. 2006-07 Results 11

  12. Thoughts on NC USED – Approved AYP Growth Model • Growth model not a panacea to solve “all or nothing” NCLB model • Lots of work for little perceived benefit • The application of safe harbor and the use of confidence intervals effaced the “benefits” of the growth model 12

  13. Thoughts on Situation • NC asked USED to allow use of confidence interval after applying AYP growth for 2006-07 – it was denied • Two different growth models is confusing to schools and public…but so are safe harbor, AMOs, confidence intervals etc. 13

  14. Thoughts on Situation • Students with disabilities taking alternate assessments were not included in growth – tests not on the same scale • How much growth is enough? • How much time to get to proficiency? 14

  15. For More Information See link(s) at: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/ accountability/reporting/abc/2005-06/ and/or contact gwilliamson@dpi.state.nc.us 919.807.3787 15

More Related