1 / 16

David Geelan Griffith University – Gold Coast

Effectiveness of Scientific Visualizations in Year 11 Chemistry and Physics Education. David Geelan Griffith University – Gold Coast. Overview. 12 Chemistry classes and 10 physics classes Comparison of student conceptual knowledge gains when taught with and without visualisations

shelly-chen
Télécharger la présentation

David Geelan Griffith University – Gold Coast

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effectiveness of Scientific Visualizations in Year 11 Chemistry and Physics Education David Geelan Griffith University – Gold Coast

  2. Overview • 12 Chemistry classes and 10 physics classes • Comparison of student conceptual knowledge gains when taught with and without visualisations • Sex of students and academic ability as further variables

  3. Background • Lots of good evidence that students enjoy learning with visualisations • Lots of teachers adopting them, lots of money being spent developing, hosting and sharing them • Not much good quality quantitative evidence of their educational effectiveness, particularly at the high school level

  4. Design • The students completed a pre-test and post-test of conceptual understanding, based on the Force Concept Inventory and the Chemistry Concept Inventory • Multiple-choice items with common student misconceptions as distracters • Cross-over experimental design: students completed one topic with visualisations and one without

  5. Teaching Comparison • Teachers taught the physics and chemistry topics either with or without using scientific visualisations • Non-visualisation cases were not necessarily just lectures, and included demonstrations and other activities • After post-test, most classes did use the visualisations

  6. Examples

  7. Results - Overall • 79 physics, 78 chemistry • 34 male, 123 female • No significant difference • t(512) = -1.48, p = .14

  8. Results - Physics • 80 physics • No significant difference • t(158)=-1.58, p=.116

  9. Results - Chemistry • 129 chemistry • No significant difference • t(256)=-.538, p=.59

  10. Results - Sex • Chemistry: no significant difference • Physics: • significant difference at p<.05 level: (t(78)=2.37, p=.02) • moderate effect size (Cohen’s d=0.54)

  11. Results – Academic Achievement • Chemistry: no significant difference • Physics: no significant difference

  12. Results – Learning Styles • Very small differences noted for physics with a slight advantage for kinesthetic learners (not visual learners) • Construct is very shaky and so was the measurement • Can’t get published with this measure included • Therefore this facet discarded

  13. Conclusion • ‘First, do no harm’: While there were no large benefits for conceptual learning observed, there was also no decrease in conceptual learning • Given the other benefits of student enjoyment and engagement, use of visualisations is probably justified • Excessive effectiveness claims should be avoided

  14. The Next Study • Applying for ARC Discovery grant: If successful study will start in 2013 • Many detail variables in relation to types of visualisations and ways they were used • Still focused on classroom-based research • More qualitative approach to students’ learning/thinking while learning with visualisations

  15. Contact Please do get in touch if you have questions, suggestions, solutions or are doing related work: d.geelan@griffith.edu.au

More Related