1 / 29

Human Enhancement Ethics CS 575 Presentation

Human Enhancement Ethics CS 575 Presentation. By Yuri Muradyan Spring 2010 Instructor: K.V. Bapa Rao, Ph.D. Overview. Introduction Definitions and Distinctions Contexts and Scenarios Freedom and Autonomy Fairness and Equity Societal Disruptions Human Dignity and “The Good Life”

sherine
Télécharger la présentation

Human Enhancement Ethics CS 575 Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Human Enhancement EthicsCS 575 Presentation By Yuri Muradyan Spring 2010 Instructor: K.V. Bapa Rao, Ph.D.

  2. Overview • Introduction • Definitions and Distinctions • Contexts and Scenarios • Freedom and Autonomy • Fairness and Equity • Societal Disruptions • Human Dignity and “The Good Life” • Rights and Obligations • Policy and Law

  3. Introduction • Human Enhancement Revolution • Advances in cognitive research • Advances of science • Nanotechnology • Fulfill our potential or become Dr. Frankenstein’s Monster? • Uber-humans?

  4. Definitions and Distinctions • What is human enhancement? • “Human enhancement” includes any activity by which we improve our bodies, minds, or abilities • 2 categories: • Natural • Artificial • Beyond species typical level

  5. Human Enhancement Vs. Therapy • Therapy is aimed at pathologies that compromise health or reduce one’s level of functioning below this species-typical • Human Enhancement – change the function and structure of the body • (corrective eyeglasses vs.. night-vision binoculars) • Steroids (muscular dystrophy or athletes) • Ritalin (ADHD and normal students) • Reading a book vs.. implanted computer chip

  6. Is the natural-artificial distinction morally significant? • Do artificial enhancements require moral evaluation? • What is natural? • exists without any human intervention or can be performed without human-engineered artifacts? • Level of complexity and engineering is the distinction? • Theological premises

  7. Is the Internal-External distinction morally significant? • Mere use of tools doesn’t qualify as human enhancement • Incorporating tools as part of our body is human enhancement • What’s so special about incorporation of tools as part of our bodies? • Direct brain link to Google vs. Computer Use • Always-On access to those capabilities • Our notion of self evolves • Smart clothes • Human Enhancement in itself is not the problem, their use in certain areas of life can be questionable

  8. Is the Therapy-Enhancement distinction significant? • Some scientist argue there is no discernable distinction: • Vaccinations: enhancement or therapy? • Genius sustains an injury which reduces her intelligence to “average” • Academia and Athletes are not the only ones at stake • Soldiers on anti-depressants • Reason to maintain the distinction: • By not making these distinction it will be too easy to argue that all human enhancement is morally permissible • Collision between our intuitions and actions • Heap of sand paradox

  9. Contexts and Scenarios • Why would contexts matter in ethics? • Vaccines are enhancements, but not all enhancements are morally unproblematic • “Enhancement” seems to be context dependant • Freely burning fossil fuels in 1910 and 2010 • How important is equality? • Life span increase • Education • Enhanced and Un-enhanced competitions

  10. What are some examples of enhancement for cognitive performance? • Pharmaceuticals (Ritalin, beta-blockers, anti-depressants, hallucinogenic and alcohols) • In the future – neural implants, “always-on access”

  11. What are some examples of enhancement for physical performance? • Pharmaceuticals (steroids) • Cosmetic surgery (non-corrective) • Prosthetics • In the future – bionic arms, artificial ears • MIT’s Institute for Soldier Nanotechnology is working on an exoskeleton • Respirocyte – artificial red blood cell • Life extension!!

  12. Should a non-therapeutic procedure that provides no net benefit be called an enhancement? • Sharpening teeth,inplanting whiskers, and clipping the ears to look like a cat • If autonomy is all that matters: • Amputating healthy limbs • Stunt growth of bedridden children • Deaf parents who specifically want a deaf baby in selecting embryos

  13. Freedom and Autonomy • Can we justify human enhancement by appealing to our right to be free? • If enhancing doesn’t harm anyone, why prevent it? • Do we have full freedom now? • Freedom of speech • Privacy • Do we want full freedom? • No restrictions or background checks on gun ownership • A REAL free market • Drive on any side of the road

  14. Could we justify enhancing if it harms no one other than the individual? • Assumption that a “procedure” may affect ONLY the health and safety of the patient is very generous • Gambling, drinking, etc… • The harm or risk to others could also be indirect • Wanting the best for our children • Effects could be cumulative • Bottled water, pesticides • Life extension

  15. Fairness and Equity • Does human enhancement raise issues of fairness, access, and equity? • If there are “enhanced” there are also “unenhanced” • Do we want total equality? • Fairness • Competition is good, as long as it remains competitive

  16. Will it matter if there is an “enhancement divide”? • Currently “digital divide” • Internet access • Future – “nano divide” and “enhancement divide” • Do we need policies to cope this situation? • Enhancement for a few scientists that enable them to better solve world’s environmental problems • Enhanced for a few athletes

  17. Societal Disruptions • Inequality, fair or not, can motivate worse-off masses to revolt • “Enhanced” job candidates • Life extension • ~20 years, retirement age 85 • More pressure on resources (food, energy, …) • Underwater living or Outer space • Are societal disruptions reason enough to restrict human enhancement?

  18. If individuals are enhanced differently, will communication be more difficult? • In Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein (1953) said that if a lion could speak, we could not understand it • What if some of us had different vision( eagle eyes)? • Or echolocation of a bat • Will we be less social?

  19. Human Dignity and “The Good Life” • Does the notion of human dignity suffer with human enhancement? • What does it mean to be human? • Discontent is hardwired into humans • Will this technologies hinder moral development? • Is the frailty necessary to appreciate life? • How soon do you get bored of life? • Are we “Playing God”?

  20. Will we need to rethink the notion of a “Good Life”? • For Aristotle, the one thing that everyone wanted for its own sake was happiness • Success • Prosperity • Achievement • James Moor: Life, Happiness, Autonomy • ability to do various things • security to do them • knowledge about doing them • freedom and opportunity to do them • resources to accomplish our goals

  21. Rights and Obligations • Is there a right to be enhanced? • 2 basic classes of rights: • Human Rights and Conventional Rights • Humans should be able to exercise their right to enhancements to the extent that it promotes their life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness

  22. Could human enhancement give us greater of fewer rights? • Steroid and Aquadynamic swimsuits • Oscar Pistorius, the South African sprinter who had his legs amputated when he was a year old but now runs on artificial legs

  23. Is there an obligation to enhance? • Vaccination • Prisoner’s ankle bracelets with built in GPS • Military and required enhancements • Nanotechnology dog tags • Brain implants to follow direct commands • “Cloak of invisibility”

  24. Should our children be enhanced? • Enhancing children will limit their future capabilities • Currently parents make similar choices • Article 26 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that everyone has the right to education and that education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms • Will we require parents to do certain enhancements? • Enhancing children to give them an edge in the society

  25. Policy and Law • Should we have regulations or restrictions on human enhancement? • 3 options: • No restrictions • Some restrictions • Full ban

  26. Should there be limits on enhancements? • Android soldiers • Destroying parts of brain that sense fear • How soon will the enemy have the same? • Asymmetric warfare

  27. Might enhanced humans count as someone’s intellectual property? • Generally speaking, naturally-occurring objects (e.g., air, water, other raw materials) cannot be patented • Biotechnology-patenting debate • Diamond v. Chakrabarty • Since then, the courts have also established that parts or sequences of genes, though not the entire gene itself, may be patented if its function is also articulated

  28. Will we need to rethink the ethics itself? • To a large extent, our ethics depends on the kinds of creatures that we are

  29. References • http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0661.html • http://www.humanenhance.com/347/new-report-funded-by-us-nsf/ • http://www.humanenhance.com/NSF_report.pdf

More Related