1 / 21

The Cohesive Strategy

The Cohesive Strategy. Need for a Cohesive Fire Management Strategy. For over 20 years, the Government Accountability Office, Office of Management and Budgets, Congress, a variety of stakeholders and various administrations have expressed concerns related to wildland fire management. .

shira
Télécharger la présentation

The Cohesive Strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Cohesive Strategy

  2. Need for a Cohesive Fire Management Strategy • For over 20 years, the Government Accountability Office, Office of Management and Budgets, Congress, a variety of stakeholders and various administrations have expressed concerns related to wildland fire management.

  3. Wildland Fire Management Concerns • Ever larger portions of public funds being diverted to fire suppression efforts • Difference in policies and varied approaches to the same problems • Lack of consistent and transparent prioritization process for the allocation of fire funding

  4. Wildland Fire Management Concerns • “Lack of a cohesive fire management strategy” • Critical stakeholders were not a key component of previous efforts

  5. The FLAME Act • 2009 Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement Act (FLAME)

  6. FLAME Components • Direct the Development of a Cohesive Strategy • The identification of the most cost effective means for allocating fire management budget resources • The reinvestment in non-fire programs by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture • Employing the most appropriate management response to wildfires

  7. FLAME Components • Direct the Development of a Cohesive Strategy • Assessing and addressing the level of risks to communities • The allocation of hazardous fuels reduction funds based on the priority of hazardous fuels reduction projects • Assessing and addressing the impacts of climate change on the frequency and severity of wildfire • Studying the effects of invasive species on wildfire risk

  8. What is Different from Previous Efforts? • 1995 Federal Fire Policy • National Fire Plan • 10 Year Comprehensive Strategy • Two recent Quadrennial Fire Reviews

  9. What is Different from Previous Efforts? • Nationally • Decision making includes all stakeholders • This is an all lands, all hands effort • Broad stakeholder participation is critical to success

  10. What is Different from Previous Efforts? • Goal One: Healthy and Resilient Landscapes • Enhance opportunities for local, collaborative efforts • Local economic-based opportunities • Fully use existing policy and authorities • Responsibility resides with all stakeholders at all levels

  11. What is Different from Previous Efforts? • Goal Two: Fire Adapted Communities • Fire Adapted Communities are broader than just the Wildland Urban Interface • Prioritize and support active community driven efforts • Use education and incentives to ensure maximum participation • Responsibility resides with all stakeholders at all levels

  12. What is Different from Previous Efforts? • Goal Three: Fire Response • Provide for safety of firefighters and the public • Collaborative effort to determine approach to risk and values at the local level • Improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the wildland fire management organization • Responsibility resides with all stakeholders at all levels

  13. Phase III - Conceptual into Qualitative and Quantitative Actions Step B Linkages Contributing Factors Step A Characterize Risk Risk Step C Exploratory Analysis > Opportunities/Barriers Step D Specific Alternatives Step E More Complete Analysis: Quantitative, Qualitative local contribution, costs, external drivers, climate Step F Synthesize and Report

  14. Phase III - Outcomes and Consequences • Responsibility resides with all stakeholders at all levels.

  15. Phase III - Outcomes and Consequences • A collaborative environment where everyone engaged and affected by wildfire: • Works toward common goals • Is aware of wildland fire risks and opportunities to address risks • Makes decisions with compatible-cohesive information • Contributes to reducing risks

  16. Phase III - Outcomes and Consequences • A policy environment that: • Recognizes opportunities to reduce risk • Rewards successful efforts to reduce risk • Recognizes barriers that prevent achieving common goals • Chips away at the barriers - an iterative process with adaptive learning

  17. Phase III - Outcomes and Consequences • A science environment that enhances multi-scale understanding of: • Wildfire risks to important values • Opportunities to reduce risk • Trade-offs among options intended to reduce risks

  18. Phase III - Outcomes and Consequences • A decision making environment where: • Complementary decisions are possible among agencies and organizations at all scales - local, regional and national • Risks are reduced and managed • Three broad common goals influence outcomes

  19. The National Website www.forestsandrangelands.gov

  20. Regional Contacts • Southeastern Regional Strategy Committee • http://sites.nemac.org/southeastcohesivefire/ • Northeastern Regional Strategy Committee • http://sites.nemac.org/northeastcohesivefire/ • Western Regional Strategy Committee • http://sites.nemac.org/westcohesivefire/

  21. Questions?

More Related