360 likes | 441 Vues
Goals of the Paper. Explore the dynamic adjustment to a new WTO Round of Trade Liberalization from 2000 to 2010 Explore how this helps Asia Crisis economies relative to a direct transfer of foreign Aid from OECD economies
E N D
Goals of the Paper • Explore the dynamic adjustment to a new WTO Round of Trade Liberalization from 2000 to 2010 • Explore how this helps Asia Crisis economies relative to a direct transfer of foreign Aid from OECD economies • Explore the impact of incorporating an empirical model of endogenous total factor productivity growth ( Chand (1999))
Key dynamic features • annual frequency • physical capital is accumulation is endogenous but subject to adjustment costs • forward looking agents in goods, factor and financial markets • full accounting of stock flow relations • combination of intertemporal optimization by agents plus liquidity constraints • sticky nominal wages
Some Important Issues • Trade, capital flows and adjustments in domestic financial markets are central to global adjustment to shocks; • Agents arbitrage between different assets within countries and across countries - taking into account the adjustment costs of changing the physical capital stock in each sector.
What are Financial Assets? • Each financial asset represents a claim over real resources • Money over purchasing power • Bonds are claims over future tax collections • Equity is a claim over the future dividend stream of a firm • Foreign assets are a claim over the future exports of the debtor country • Asset values embody expectations of future real activities
Sectors • Energy • Mining • Agriculture • Durable Manufacturing • Non-Durable Manufacturing • Services
A New Millenium Round • In 2000, it is announced that existing tariffs will be reduced by 1/3 from 2000 to 2010 in most countries • Tariffs on goods trade are based on the GTAP4 database (see Table 3a) • For services it is assumed there is a cost reduction based on work by Centre for International Economics (see Table 3b)
Summary • Largest gains to countries liberalizing most • short run losses outweighed by long run gains • trade impacts /exchange rate adjustments tend to be the opposite in the short run relative to the medium run (role of intertemporal budget constraints)
Aid Simulation • Indonesia, Korea, Thailand and Philippines receive a direct transfer from the OECD economies such that: • The transfer declines by 10% per year after 2000 • Receiving countries are no worse off in terms of the present value of consumption than under the trade liberalization simulation. • Donor countries donate in proportion to their share of GDP in the donor total
Summary • Income transfer causes adjustment through the balance of payments • consumption of receiving countries rise • consumption of donating countries fall • trade liberalization is a better way to help crisis economies
Total factor productivity growth in manufacturing endogenous to the change in tariffs (following the econometric results of Satish Chand (1999)
Summary • Making TFP growth endogenous to changes in tariff rates increases the gains from liberalization • But also accentuates the adjustment process through the balance of payments in the short run
Conclusion • Dynamics in the sense used in this paper adds a richer story to trade liberalization • In particular there are many problems - noticeable to policy makers in the real world - which need to be understood • Many short term results (over a decade) are the opposite of the long term neoclassical results that come from conventional CGE models.