1 / 23

Distributed Instance Retrieval over Heterogeneous Ontologies

2 nd Italian Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives. Distributed Instance Retrieval over Heterogeneous Ontologies. Andrei Tamilin (1,2) & Luciano Serafini (1) (1) ITC-IRST (2) DIT - University of Trento. Trento, 16 December, 2005. Outline. Motivation and problem

sienna
Télécharger la présentation

Distributed Instance Retrieval over Heterogeneous Ontologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2nd Italian Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives Distributed Instance Retrieval over Heterogeneous Ontologies Andrei Tamilin(1,2) & Luciano Serafini(1) (1)ITC-IRST (2)DIT - University of Trento Trento, 16 December, 2005

  2. Outline • Motivation and problem • Distributed Description Logics (DDLs) with individuals • Reasoning/Querying patterns in DDLs • Instance retrieval in DDLs • Implementing

  3. Motivation: a step back Where we were: • Steady ontology proliferation • Heterogeneity is inevitable Problem: • How to interoperate? Requirements: • Semantic mappings • Reasoning support Solution: • Distributed Description Logics • Distributed tableaux • DRAGO reasoning system

  4. Motivation: a step forth Where we are: • Ontologies are populated • Populations can be done in heterogeneous domains Problem: • How to query such a system?

  5. Classes, Relations, Axioms PersonContact PersonContact Instances A toy example ODIT OUniTn ? Retrieve all personal contacts andrei.tamilin@unitn.it http://dit.unitn.it/~tamilin • In case of which semantic correspondences • the query propagation should occur? • How the individuals should be transformed? andrei.tamilin@dit.unitn.it tamilin@itc.it …

  6. Requirements / Our proposals Requirements / Our proposals • Formal framework reflecting conceptual and individual heterogeneity • Extend Distributed Description Logics with individuals • Define a suitable query answering procedure • Extend Distributed tableau algorithm • Implement the querying procedure • Extend DRAGO reasoning system

  7. DDLs in a nutshell • Captures the case of multiple ontologies pairwise linked by semantic mappings • Ontologies correspond to DL knowledge bases • Mappings correspond to bridge rules

  8. i:X j:Y (onto-bridge rule) i:X j:Y (into-bridge rule) DDLs syntax • DDL is a family of description logics {DLi}iI • A bridge rule from i to j is an expression of the form: where X and Y are concepts of DLi and DLj. • A distributed T-box (DTB) is a pair {Ti}iI, {Bij}ijI where Bij is a collection of bridge rules from i to j

  9. i:x j:y (individual correspondence) DDLs syntax with individuals • An individual correspondence from i to j is an expression of the form: • where x and y are individuals of Ai and Aj. • A distributed A-box (DAB) is a pair {Ai}iI, {Cij}ijI where Cij is a collection of individual correspondences from i to j • A distributed knowledge base (DKB) is a pair DTB, DAB

  10. DLi DLj Terminologies (T-boxes) Bij Assertions (A-boxes) Cij Domains rij DDLs semantics {DLi}iI + {Bij}ijI {Ti}iI DTB= {Ti}iI, {Bij}ijI  {Ai}iI + {Cij}ijI DTA= {Ai}iI, {Cij}ijI  {Ji}iI + {rij}ijI DI= {Ji}iI, {rij}ijI 

  11. i:X j:Y Into-bridge rule DI rij(xIi)  YIj Ij Ii Y X rij(X) rij

  12. i:X j:Y Onto-bridge rule DI rij(XIi)  YIj rij(X) Ij Ii X rij Y

  13. i:x j:y Individual correspondence DI xIi,yIj rij Ij Ii rij y x

  14. isA DTB Terminological propagation DTB= T1, T2, B12 T1 T2 A G isA H B GI2r12(AI1)  r12(BI1) HI2

  15. DKB Assertion propagation DKB= T1,A1,T2,A2, B12,C12 T1 T2 B H isInstanceOf isInstanceOf A1 A2 b h hI2=r12(bI1)  r12(BI1) HI2

  16. DKB Assertion propagation - II DKB= T1,A1,T2,A2, B12,C12 T1 T2 B H isInstanceOf isInstanceOf fij A1 A2 fij(b) b

  17. Distributed instance retrieval • Instance retrieval: finding all individuals that instantiate a given concept • Both propagation aspects should be taken into account

  18. D1 Local taxonomy D3 D2 Local individuals i2 i1 i3 Retrieve instances of D1 i1, i2

  19. Bridge rules Distributed taxonomy (terminological propagation matters) D1 D3 D2 Local individuals i2 i1 i3 Retrieve instances of D1 i1, i2, i3

  20. Bridge rules Distributed taxonomy (terminological propagation matters) D1 D3 D2 Individual correspondences Local individuals i2 i1 i3 Distributed individuals (transformed via individual correspondences) i’2 Retrieve instances of D1 i1, i2, i3, i’2

  21. Implementation • On top of DRAGO distributed terminological reasoner • DRAGO is a peer-to-peer network of communicating reasoners that handle OWL ontologies coupled with C-OWL mappings • For the instance retrieval the possibility to specify instance transformations has been added

  22. Conclusions and Outlook • We addressed the problem of retrieving individuals over heterogeneous ontologies which are instantiated in semantically related domains • We extended DDLs framework with individual correspondences and discussed how this enables the propagation of assertions over ontologies • Implemented a simple querying prototype on top of DRAGO reasoner

  23. Thank you

More Related