1 / 42

Locating Electric vehicle charging stations in Los angeles

Source: Ecotality. David Peterson UP206a – GIS (Estrada) December 6, 2010. Locating Electric vehicle charging stations in Los angeles. Mayor wants LA to be #1 city for EVs EVSE can influence adoption rates Where will public investment in EVSEs generate highest benefit?. introduction.

silvio
Télécharger la présentation

Locating Electric vehicle charging stations in Los angeles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Source: Ecotality David Peterson UP206a – GIS (Estrada) December 6, 2010 Locating Electric vehicle charging stations in Los angeles

  2. Mayor wants LA to be #1 city for EVs EVSE can influence adoption rates Where will public investment in EVSEs generate highest benefit? introduction

  3. EVs require a completely new infrastructure to connect to electricity grid Single-family residential: not an issue Problem statement

  4. Focus on Problem Areas: • Multi-family residential • Employment Centers • Commercial Centers Problem statement

  5. Goal: • Anticipate concentrations of EV ownership • Use 2008 Hybrid ownership data as proxy for EV ownership • Origins: Multifamily residential problem • Destinations: Making sure they can charge at destination Methodology

  6. Absolute number of vehicles? Percent capture of total vehicles in LA? Percent of total vehicles within zip code? Origins: measuring hybrid ownership

  7. Zip Code 90501: • #1 for vehicles: 2,537 • #8 In terms of Percent of Local Zip Code • Zip Code 90001: • #2 for Penetration of Local Zip Code • Only has 2 vehicles! • What’s the best measurement?

  8. 41,079 hybrids in LA 12,948 in the top 10 (32%) Top 10 LA Zip codes: hybrid ownership

  9. In top 10, what is percent housing type? Data Problem: don’t know housing type by hybrid vehicle ownership. Assumption: Hybrid owners reflect zip code housing type distribution Origin: multifamily housing problem

  10. Origin: multifamily housing problem

  11. 90071: no housing, but ranks 5th (1,070) by total hybrids – must be government/business/etc. • Multifamily charging is an issue: • Mix of SFR and MFR • Range 15% to 73% • Mean: 41% Origin: multifamily housing problem

  12. Index that combines vehicle ownership and multifamily housing • Greater weight on more vehicles (1-4) • Greater weight on more MFR (1-4) • Combine to create Investment Prioritization Index Hotspot Analysis • Index=[vehicles_weighted]+[MFR_weighted] Origins: prioritizing investment

  13. Origins: prioritizing investment

  14. Data Problem: don’t know exactly where hybrid owners commute • Assumption: use zip code trip distribution • Methodology: • Weight % allocation of trips by actual number of hybrid vehicles in origin zip codes • Aggregate for a complete picture of destinations Destinations: hybrid commutes

  15. Is destination charging a real concern? Average Commute range: 40 miles (r/t) Battery Range: 80-100 Miles Not a real concern given current travel behavior, but people might travel differently with EVs Destinations: hybrid commutes

  16. 90501 destination trip example

  17. 90501 destination trip example

  18. Destinations: hybrid commutes

  19. Destinations: hybrid commutes

  20. Use Index to Allocate Funds to Origin Zip Codes that will benefit the most. • Know the top 10 destinations for these origins. • Not imperative to invest in public charging given vehicle range • Need to monitor/track travel behavior • Providing EVSEs at these stations could induce greater adoption (but is it best use of public funds? Conclusion

  21. Appendix A: Models Appendix B: Original Map Layer Appendix C: Metadata Appendix D: Map with 7 Layers Appendix E: Skills Questions?

  22. Model for Rasterizing Layers for index/hotspot analysis inputs Appendix A: model

  23. Model for 50-mile buffer Appendix A: model

  24. Model for Clipping Buffer to Land Contours Appendix A: model

  25. Appendix b: Original map layer

  26. Appendix C: metadata

  27. Appendix d: map with 7 layers

  28. Slide 8 • Inset Map • Geoprocessing: clipped California zip code files • Slide 10 • tables • Slides 11/12: • Attribute sub-set selection based on number of hybrid vehicles Appendix e: Skills & associated problems

  29. Slides 13/15 • Tables • Slide 17: • Sub-set selection; Pie charts • Slides 19/20/21 • Rasterization of data layers using a model • Creation of Index for Hotspot Analysis using a model • Use of Spatial Analyst Appendix e: Skills & associated problems

  30. Slide 22: • Table • Slide 25: • Used model to create distance buffer from top 10 zip code centroids • Slide 26: • Use of Network Analyst to generate database file and OD Cost matrix • Slide 27: • Table Appendix e: Skills & associated problems

  31. Slide 28/29: • Attribute sub-set selection • Slide 30: • Table • Slides 33-35: • Models • Slide 36 • Original Map Layer • Slide 37: • Creation of Metadata • x Appendix e: Skills & associated problems

More Related