90 likes | 198 Vues
The CDDLM Working Group convened from March 10-12, 2004, in Berlin, Germany, to discuss key agenda items including the foundation document, SmartFrog-based language specification, XML-based language specification, and relationships with other working groups. The agenda comprised note-taking, agenda bashing, detailed reviews of specifications, plans for formal submissions, and discussions on various prototypes and use cases. Future steps involving relationship summaries and action plans were also highlighted, emphasizing the importance of synergy among related groups.
E N D
CDDLM-WG Agenda at GGF10 Takashi Kojo, Dejan Milojicic, and the Team Berlin, Germany March 10-12, 2004
Overall Agenda • #1 CDDLM-WG Foundation Document, 10/3, 7pm • #2 CDDLM-WG SmartFrog-Based Language Spec, 11/3, 8:30 • Today • #3 CDDLM-WG XML-Based Language Spec, 12/3, 8:30am • #4 CDDLM-WG Relationship to other WG/RG, 12/3, 2pm
#1 • Note Takers • Agenda Bashing • Introduction • Overall • This meeting • Foundation Spec • Going over the spec • Required changes • Plans for formal submission • Provisioning Definition, Jem Treadwell(?) • Program execution (?) • Various
#2 • Note Takers • Agenda Bashing • Introduction • SmartFrog-based Language Spec • Going over the spec • Required changes • Plans for formal submission • Various • Demo, time permitting (?)
#3 • Note Takers • Agenda Bashing • Introduction • XML-Based Language Draft Spec • Various
#4 • Note Takers • Agenda Bashing • Introduction • Relationship to other WG • GGF • OGSA-WG (CMM, PE,..) • JSDL, Peter Toft • GRAAP, Dejan Milojicic • CGS-WG, Larry Flon • DRMAA, Hrabri Rajic • DAIS-WG, done • WFM-RG, EG-RG, Alex Villazon • External • DMTF (CIM), DMTF Utility Computing, Andrea Westerinen • OASIS WSDM, Stuart Schaefer • OASIS WSRF, Steve Loughran • DCML, …. • Future Steps • Various
Other Relevant Discussions • Other Specs • Basic Services • Component model (life cycle mgmt) • Prototype Implementations • Contributions to OGSA • Service definition • Use Cases • More? • Various
Summary • 4 weeks for liaisons to come back with report • Relationship summary • Conflicts (overlaps, holes, different views, etc.) • Synnergies • Plans of action, if any • Brief summary of related group from our perspective • Relationships • Architectural (PE, JSDL, resources, provisioning) • Models • Ways of mgmt
Brussels, workshop(?) September • 3 demos, prototype reference implementations • Bring other groups • DMTF Applications WG, 5 weeks present • Follow-up the other way, Karl Schopmeyer