1 / 19

Approaches to Galactic MHD Problem: Shell Model

This paper presents various approaches to the problem of Galactic MHD (Magneto-hydrodynamics) using a Shell Model. It discusses the application of Shell Model in understanding MHD turbulence with rotation, cross-helicity injection, and the free decay of MHD turbulence. The paper also explores the use of a thin disk dynamo model in studying galactic phenomena.

skersey
Télécharger la présentation

Approaches to Galactic MHD Problem: Shell Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Shell Model Approaches to the Problem of Galactic MHD Rodion Stepanov, Peter Frick, ICMM, Perm, Russia Dmitry Sokoloff , MSU, Russia Franck Plunian, LGIT, Grenoble, France • Why and what is a shell model? • MHD turbulence with rotation and applied magnetic field • Forced MHD turbulence with cross-helicity injection • Magnetic helicity in a free decay of MHD turbulence • Combined thin disk dynamo model

  2. 1015 1 103 106 109 1012 1015 Rm=UL/h Interstellar medium Galaxies 10+12 1012 Convective zone The Sun 10+9 Accretion discs 109 10+6 10-3 10-6 1 Pm=10+3 106 Liquid core Jupiter 103 Liquid core The Earth DNS Experiments Liquid Na 1 Re=UL/n

  3. Kolmogorov 41 Energy cascade Spectral flux Dissipation e e Inertial range k kn kF Large Small

  4. Mean field equation

  5. Shell model of MHD turbulence Brandenburg, A. et al, 1996; Frick, P. and Sokoloff, D. 1998; Basu, A. et al 1998 Generic equations: Triadic interaction: p k q Coefficients c are derived from conservation laws (total energy, cross-helicity, magnetic helicity)

  6. How much do we gain ? uk k -1/3 k kn kF 3D Kolmogorov Number of gridpoints per unit volume: Number of time steps: Number of timesteps x gridpoints: Shell model Number of logarithmic shells: Number of timesteps x gridpoints:

  7. Small scale dynamo at low Pm Pm=10-3 Re=109 Eu Eb Stepanov R. and Plunian F., 2006, J. Turbulence

  8. Phenomenology of isotropic turbulence with applied rotation and field Zhou 1995

  9. W R RA (e /h)1/2 RKA RK e =W vA2 vA 0 (he)1/4 W= vA2 /h E(k) E(k) W 1/2 e1/2 k -2 W 1/2 e1/2 k -2 vA1/2 e1/2 k -3/2 e2/3 k -5/3 R A E (k) R K E(k) W1/2 e1/2 k -2 W1/2e1/2k-2 vA /h W /vA (e /h3)1/4 (W 3/e)1/2 e2/3 k -5/3 vA1/2 e1/2 k -3/2 R R K A (W3/e)1/2 e /vA3 vA /h (W/h)1/2

  10. E(k) E(k) W 1/2 e1/2 k -2 W 1/2 e1/2 k -2 vA1/2 e1/2 k -3/2 e2/3 k -5/3 R A R K E(k) W1/2 e1/2 k -2 vA /h W /vA (e /h3)1/4 (W 3/e)1/2 e2/3 k -5/3 vA1/2 e1/2 k -3/2 R K A (W3/e)1/2 e /vA3 vA /h Plunian F. and Stepanov R. 2010, PRE

  11. Energy spectra for different cross helicity input rate Energy injection rate – e=1 Cross-helicity injection rate – c<1 Normalized spectra Spectral index versus c k k c The stationary input of cross-helicity strongly affects the small-scale turbulence: the spectral energy transfer becomes less efficient and the turbulence accumulates the total energy. Mizeva I.A. et al, 2009, Doklady Physics

  12. Long-term free decay 128 runs Re=Rm=105 Evolution up to t=105 Initial conditions Normalized cross-helicityC=Hc/E First scenario: C=±1 Second scenario Frick & Stepanov 2010

  13. Long-term free decay Cross-helicity vs time Cross-helicity spectra for different time Inverse cascade of cross-helicity

  14. Long-term free decay • at t=100 • at t=1000 • at t=10000 Normalized magnetic helicity Cb=Hb/Eb Second scenario: Cb=±1

  15. k<1 is available E

  16. Mean fields (large-scale) Turbulent fields (small-scale) Coupling: small large GRID-SHELL MODEL OF TURBULENT DISK DYNAMO large small

  17. Numerical results large-scale poloidal/toroidal magnetic field small-scale kinetic/magnetic field Energy of vs time αu≠0αb=0 D=-1 αu≠0αb=0 D=-20 αu≠0αb=0 D=-100 αu≠0αb≠0 D=-200

  18. Global reversals Dynamical alpha-quenching log α log <B>

  19. Conclusion remarks • Shell models have passed many tests • Shell models can be used to check phenomenological predictions • Shell models are able to give something new about MHD turbulence

More Related