Download
1 / 38
380 likes | 571 Vues
Theoretical Preliminaries. Information structure Information packaging (Chafe 1976). The ‘Given-new contract’ (Halliday 1967, Halliday & Hasan 1976):
E N D
Information structure Information packaging (Chafe 1976)
The ‘Given-new contract’ (Halliday 1967, Halliday & Hasan 1976): Given information tends to appear closer to the beginning of a sentence, while new information tends to appear closer to the end of a sentence.
Prague School: Communicative Dynamism increases from the beginning to the end of an utterance, resulting in a tendency toward a given- before-new ordering of information.
(1) Alice was beginning to get very tired of sitting by her sister on the bank, and of having nothing to do: once or twice she had peeped into the book her sister was reading, but it had no pictures or conversations in it, ‘and what is the use of a book,’ thought Alice ‘without pictures or conversation?’ [Lewis Carroll, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]
(2) Alice was beginning to get very tired of sitting by her sister on the bank, and of having nothing to do: once or twice the book her sister was reading had caught her attention, but no pictures or conversations appeared in it, ‘and what is the use of a book,’ thought Alice ‘without pictures or conversation?’
A canonical-word-order sentence in English discourse prefers, but does not require, its constituents to be ordered with given information preceding new information.
A variety of noncanonical-word-order constructions serve to: (a) mark the information status of their constituents, and (b) facilitate processing through the positioning of these constituents.
The speaker’s choice of construction serves to structure the informational flow of the discourse.
(3) Beds ringed the room, their iron feet sinking into thick shirdiks woven in colorful patterns of birds and flowers. At the foot of each bed rested a stocky wooden chest, festooned with designs of cranes and sheep, horses and leaves. [Wilson, D.L. I Rode a Horse of Milk White Jade. 1998:133]
Two chairs sat in the room, their iron feet sinking into thick shirdiks woven in colorful patterns of birds and flowers. #At the foot of a bed rested the chairs, their backs festooned with designs of cranes and sheep, horses and leaves. (4)
Noncanonical-word-order constructions that serve to mark information status differ from canonical word orders in that, although both are subject to a preferred ordering of information, only the former imposes such an ordering as a requirement for the felicity of the utterance.
Topic • Discourse-old vs. discourse-new information • Hearer-old vs. hearer-new information • Link • Open Proposition
More specifically, the topic is: “the matter of current interest which a statement is about and with respect to which a proposition is to be interpreted as relevant.” (Lambrecht 1994)
(2) Alice was beginning to get very tired of sitting by her sister on the bank, and of having nothing to do: once or twice the book her sister was reading had caught her attention, but no pictures or conversations appeared in it, ‘and what is the use of a book,’ thought Alice ‘without pictures or conversation?’
In English, the subject is the unmarked or default topic.
Some Tests for Topichood The Question-Answer Test: Q: What did John eat? A: John ate a banana. Q: Who ate a banana? A: John ate a banana.
Accent: Q: What did John eat? A: John ate the BANANA. A′: #JOHN ate the banana.
The “As-for” Test: As for John, he ate the banana. As for the banana, John ate it. The “About” Test: She said about John that he ate the banana. She said about the banana that John ate it.
(5) Alice was beginning to get very tired of sitting by her sister on the bank, and of having nothing to do: #As for Alice, once or twice she had peeped into the book her sister was reading, but it had no pictures or conversations in it....
Prince 1992 • No binary distinction is sufficient • Three distinctions: • Presupposition/focus • Discourse-old/discourse-new • Hearer-old/hearer-new
(6) Gov. Rod Blagojevich, while scaling back a massive capital program, said Friday he would endorse a $3.6 billion state construction budget that includes new money to build schools and millions of dollars for legislative pork-barrel projects. [Chicago Tribune, 8/23/03, beginning of article]
“Inferrable” information: Shares the distribution of discourse-old information in being linked to prior information
Linking relations (7) a. I walked into the kitchen. On a tall counter lay a large book. b. I walked into the kitchen. #On a blue jacket lay a large book.
The link represents information that stands in a salient set relationship with information evoked in the prior context.
The set that relates the link to the prior context is the anchoring set, and the linguistic material licensing the inference to this set as the trigger.
(7) a. I walked into the kitchen. On a tall counter lay a large book. • a tall counter is the link • {things in a kitchen} is the anchoring set • the kitchen is the trigger
Open Propositions (cf. Presupposition/Focus) An Open Proposition (OP) is a proposition in which some element is ‘open’ or unspecified.
(8) a. Where are your mittens? b. Your mittens are X:Xε{places} (‘Your mittens are someplace’)
(9) a. I found your mittens. b. I found X:Xε{objects} (‘I found something’) c. X:Xε{people} found your mittens (‘Someone found your mittens’) d. I did X:Xε{activities} (‘I did something’)
The felicitous use of certain constructions requires that a particular OP be salient in the discourse context.
(10) a. Two sets of immigration bills currently before this session of Congress are giving observers both hope and worry. What is at stake are the immigration rights of gay people, and though gay legislation generally moves slowly, voting is expected soon. [Au Courant] OP: X:Xε{issues} is at stake (‘Something is at stake’)
b. Triggs is a lexicographer. Over his desk hangs the 18th-century dictionary maker Samuel Johnson's ironical definition: "A writer of dictionaries; a harmless drudge that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the signification of words." What Triggs actually does is find alert readers who recognize new words or new usages for ordinary ones. [N.Y. Times News Service] OP: Triggs does X:Xε{activities} (‘Triggs does something’)
The OP constitutes the presupposition. The instantiation of the variable constitutes the focus.
(11) a. Hey, look! That’s my friend Jeremy Triggs over there. He’s a lexicographer. What he does is find alert readers who recognize new words or new usages for ordinary ones. b. Hey, look! That’s my friend Jeremy Triggs over there. #What he does is find alert readers who recognize new words or new usages for ordinary ones.
