1 / 15

UN Lithium Battery Tests 1985 - 2013

UN Lithium Battery Tests 1985 - 2013. George A. Kerchner PRBA – The Rechargeable Battery Association 1776 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 202.719.4109 gkerchner@wileyrein.com. 1985 ICAO Packing Instructions*. * Similar entries in IMDG Code. 1985 ICAO Packing Instructions*.

slade
Télécharger la présentation

UN Lithium Battery Tests 1985 - 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UN Lithium Battery Tests1985 - 2013 George A. Kerchner PRBA – The Rechargeable Battery Association 1776 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 202.719.4109 gkerchner@wileyrein.com

  2. 1985 ICAO Packing Instructions* * Similar entries in IMDG Code

  3. 1985 ICAO Packing Instructions* * IMDG Code had similar requirements but limits batteries to 500 g Li metal

  4. 1985 ICAO Packing Instructions* • Tests in Packing Instruction 406 included following tests: - Thermal - Short circuit - Altitude - Vibration - Shock * Same requirements in IMDG Code

  5. 1989 – 1990 • December 1990, UN Sub-Committee Meeting • Canada proposes series of tests for lithium batteries • No reference to origin of tests • Passing tests authorizes classification of batteries as Class 9 dangerous goods

  6. 1991 – 1992 • July 1992 proposal from U.S. and Canada • Special Provision 188 • Exception for “small” batteries, no UN testing required • Exception for “medium” batteries, provided UN tests conducted • Special Provision 230 • Applies to larger batteries; UN testing required • Battery may not contain more than 500 g Li metal • Meeting report notes UN tests generally consistent with new IEC standard; new ISO standard also being developed

  7. 1991 – 1992 • December 1992, UN Committee adopts new UN tests and Special Provisions • New definitions but no distinction made between small and large lithium batteries • Shock test references IEC standard 68-2-27 • “… applicable to components, equipments and other electrotechnical products.” • New tests and definitions effective January 1995 • Section 38.3, Second Revised Edition of UN Manual

  8. 1997 – 1998 • Significant activity and participation by Sub-Committee members and industry • Germany, Canada, U.S. , France, IEC, PRBA, NEMA, EPBA and BAJ • Emphasis on Lithium ion battery technology and need to distinguish between large and small lithium batteries • Germany proposes change to shock test • Notes shock tests simulating auto accidents typically range up to 40 g peak

  9. 1997 – 1998 • Agree to modify UN tests to account for lithium ion technology • Equivalent lithium content introduced in Model Regulations • New definitions for Large and Small Cells and Batteries • Large battery: aggregate lithium content > 500 g • No exception for battery assemblies over 500 g lithium content • Shock test • Small cells and batteries, test unchanged (75 g and 125 g to 175 g) • New test criteria for Large cells and batteries - subject to 50 g • Test still references IEC 68-2-27 • New tests and definition effective January 2001 • Section 38.3, Third Revised Edition of UN Manual

  10. 1999 – 2000 • Canada and Germany again raise question about testing large EV batteries • “Modules” as batteries first mentioned • March 1999 lithium metal battery incident at LAX airport • March 2000, Intercessional WG meeting held in Ottawa • December 2000, UN agrees to substantial changes to lithium battery tests • Require testing of all cells and batteries (i.e., “small” cells and batteries no longer exempt from testing)

  11. 1999 – 2000 • Shock test changed to require 150 g for Small cells and batteries and 50 g for Large cells and batteries • Exemption from testing adopted for battery assemblies containing over 500 g lithium content based on U.S. and Japan proposal • New tests and definitions effective January 2003 • Section 38.3, Amendment 1, Third Revised Edition of UN Manual

  12. 2005 – 2006 • PRBA proposals adopted • New entries in Model Regulations for Lithium ion batteries to distinguish from Lithium metal batteries • Regulate Lithium ion batteries based on Watt-hours instead of equivalent lithium content (ELC) • 20 Wh replaces 1.5 g ELC for cells • 100 Wh replaces 8 g ELC for batteries • 6200 Wh replaces 500 g ELC for battery assemblies • Applicable changes made to UN Manual • New tests and definitions effective January 2009 • Section 38.3, Amendment 2, Fourth Revised Edition of UN Manual

  13. 2007 – 2008 • July 2008, PRBA proposal adopted eliminating testing of discharged lithium ion cells/batteries • November 2008, PRBA hosts working group meeting on UN lithium battery tests • December 2008, PRBA proposals adopted • Testing one battery assembly < 6200 Wh • Exemption from the overcharge test for batteries not equipped with overcharge protection designed for use only in battery assembly (with overcharge protection) • “Large battery” definition changed from > 500 g Li content / 6200 Wh to gross mass > 12 kg • New tests and definitions effective January 2011 - Section 38.3, Fifth Revised Edition of UN Manual

  14. 2009 – 2010 • Working group meetings held in Paris, Kyoto and Washington, DC • December 2010, UN adopts changes to UN tests and definitions focused primarily on small cells and batteries • Vibration test for large batteries changed • Peak acceleration reduced from 8 g to 2 g • New tests and definitions effective January 2013 • Section 38.3, Amendment 1, Fifth Revised Edition of UN Manual

  15. Section 1.1.2 of UN Manual of Tests and Criteria • The competent authority has discretion to dispense with certain tests, to vary the details of tests, and to require additional tests when this is justified to obtain a reliable and realistic assessment of the hazard of a product. • How is this used by competent authorities? • Does it authorize modifications to UN tests? • Are such approvals recognized internationally?

More Related