1 / 33

Indicators on Quality of Employment

Indicators on Quality of Employment. Availability, relevance and recommendations from the German point of view Seminar of the Task Force on Quality of Employment Geneva, 14-16 October 2009. Agenda. How did it work ? Experience with the indicators Missing groups Possible new indicators

smunoz
Télécharger la présentation

Indicators on Quality of Employment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Indicators on Quality of Employment Availability, relevance and recommendations from the German point of view Seminar of the Task Force on Quality of Employment Geneva, 14-16 October 2009

  2. Agenda • How did it work ? • Experience with the indicators • Missing groups • Possible new indicators • Conclusions

  3. How did it work? • 30 proposed indicators • (Basis: List provided on 10 August 2009) • 2 not available at all • 1 not fully available • 5 available in a similar definition only • Other possible and new indicators • Child labour: no data available • Child labour: data available for children aged 15-17 years • Average weekly earnings Paid leave Sick leave Collective wage bargaining • Dimension 1c 4 indicators Dimension 2 1 indicator Dimension 3a 1 indicator Dimension 7 8 indicators outcome in Germany: 48 indicators

  4. How did it work? II • Sources used: • Labour Force Survey (LFS) • European Structure of Earnings Survey (SES) • European Statistics on Accidents at Work (ESAW) • European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) • National Labour Office • National Accounts • Volume of Labour Accounts (national estimation on hours worked)

  5. Report on selected indicators • Sub-Dimensions • Fair Treatment • Non-wage Pecuniary Benefits • Part-time Employment in Germany • Balancing Working and Non-working Life • Lifelong Learning • Workplace Relationships

  6. Dimension 1: Safety and Ethics of Employment Fair treatment in employment • Sub-Dimension was cancelled as it was decided to analyse all indicators by population groups • Gender and Age easily available • Immigrants partly available for non-nationals • Ethnic minorities minor relevance in Germany • Indigenous population minor relevance in Germany • Persons with disabilities only little information available • Recommendation  find some more specific indicators on fair treatment in employment

  7. Dimension 1: Safety and Ethics of Employment Fair treatment in employment • Results for some indicators on fair treatment 1998 2008 • Employed women as a share in total employment 43.2% 46.0% • Occupational segregation by sex 42.9% 38.9% • Occupational segregation by citizenship - 22.4% • Female share of employment in managerial and total employment ISCO 1 administrative occupations (ISCO 1) 1.9 % 26.2 % • Recommendation  keep (some) special indicators on fair treatment in employment

  8. Dimension 2: Income and Benefits Non wage pecuniary benefits Paid annual leave • 100% of the employees are by law entitled to paid annual leave • No data available on used paid annual leave • But on average number of days per employee (two sources: SES and IAB volume of labour accounts) Source: SES 2006 and IAB Volume of Labour Accounts 2006

  9. Dimension 2: Income and Benefits Non wage pecuniary benefits • Sick leave • 100% of the employees are by law entitled to paid sick leave • No data available on used sick leave but • on average number of days per employee • on number of employees in sick leave during a specific period • (Source: IAB volume of labour accounts) Source: IAB Volume of Labour Accounts 2006

  10. Dimension 2: Income and Benefits Non wage pecuniary benefits • Problems: - SES results: only available for enterprises in NACE C to O, not L with more than 10 employees - no weekly earnings available (only hourly or monthly) - Volume of Labour Accounts are based on several sources. It is questionable whether similar accounts exist in (all) other countries. • Recommendation  give clear definitions on the indicators •  include the Gender Pay Gap as an indicator

  11. Dimension 3: Working Hours Part-time employment – a German problem? • 25% work in part-time employment • Indicators on - income and benefits (Dimension 2) • - hours worked (Dimension 3) • show low figures for Germany because they are calculated regarding total employment. •  clear definition which groups to use for calculation * If harmonised definition of part-time is used

  12. Dimension 3: Working Hours Part-time employment in Europe

  13. Dimension 3: Working Hours Definitions of part-time • 20 hours • 30 hours • 31 hours • 32 hours • 35 hours • self-declared status • Point for discussion: 20 hours as a definition of a typical side job? 31.5 % 26.7 % 25.9 % 25.9 % 25.7 % 17.5 % Source: German LFS 2008

  14. Dimension 3: Working Hours Reasons for working part-time • “Involuntary“ part-time • Involuntary covers only „could not find full-time job“ • other reasons will not always be „voluntary“ e.g. - Looking after children or incapacitated adults - Other personal or family reasons • Reference is made to the main reason only Source: German LFS 2008

  15. Dimension 3: Working Time Arrangements Flexible work schedules • Share of employees in flexible work schedules • Very high relevance • Comparability: European wide • Problems: available in LFS ad hoc-Module 2004 only Source: LFS ad hoc-module 2004

  16. Dimension 3: Working Hours and Working Time Arrangements • Problems: • Lack of harmonised definition of part-time • “Involuntary“ part-time rate might be misleading • Flexible Work Schedules are only asked in ad hoc-Modules • Recommendations  give a definition for part-time employment  discuss “involuntary” part-time  Include questions on flexible work schedules as standard LFS variables

  17. Dimension 4: Security of Employment and Social Protection • Problems: • Indicators depend very much on institutional and legal context • Contributing to a pension fund and the unemployment insurance is mandatory in Germany except for certain (heterogeneous) groups • Economic trends may influence indicators • Recommendations: • Discuss relevance and comparability of proposed indicators • Include new indicator on employees working for temporary work agencies

  18. Dimension 6: Skills Development and Life-long LearningJob Training • Job training in the • last 4 weeks (LFS) • vs. • last 12 months (German Microcensus) Source: LFS 2008 and German Microcensus 2008

  19. Dimension 6: Skills Development and Life-long LearningSkill missmatch • Calculation via ISCED - ISCO classification • vs. • Targeted question in EWCS Source: LFS 2008 and EWCS 2005

  20. Dimension 6: Skills Development and Life-long Learning • Problems: • Most indicators heavily rely upon the codification of occupations according to ISCO (not straightforward in Germany) • Recommendations: • Implications for international comparability • Recent job training needs harmonisation (4 weeks vs. 12 months)

  21. Dimension 7: Workplace Relationships • Four indicators similar to those discussed before • Share of employees who feel Results • they have very good friends at work 69.3 % • they get assistance from their superior/boss 59.1 % • they have been a victim of discrimination at work 7.1 % • they have been harassed at work 4.5 % Source: EWCS 2005

  22. Dimension 7: Intrinsic Nature of Work • Four indicators similar to those discussed before • Share of employees who feel Results • they do "useful" work 77.4 % • receive regular feedback from their supervisor 66 % • they are able to apply their own ideas in work 45.8 % • satisfied with their working conditions 88.2 % Source: EWCS 2005

  23. Dimension 7: Workplace Relationships and Intrinsic Nature of Work • Source: EWCS 2005, national survey • Problems: small sample size for big countries • Recommendations:  include “soft” indicators in the LFS (?)

  24. Missing groups in indicators • Self employed • Possible aspects for indicators: - entrepreneurial freedom - dependency upon individual clients - degree to which work is carried out upon detailed constructions of the client • Possible Source: LFS after implementation of a set of questions on self employed • Unpaid family members • Persons in informal employment

  25. New indicators proposed by Germany • Child labour: - Work in the evening or at night • Fair treatment: - Female share of employment in managerial and administrative occupations (ISCO 1) - Further indicators on population groups • Benefits from Employment: - Career opportunities in current job • Working hours: - Employees working few hours (side jobs) • Work-life Balance: - Employees who feel time stressed - Time used for commuting • Security of Employment: - Employees working for a temporary work agency - Laps of time since the start of the main job - Employees who changed their job in the last 12 months • Skills: - Targeted Question on skill mismatch

  26. General comments • 1) Precise definitions are needed • 2) as well as • Formulas • Preferred source • Concepts to be used • Employed persons / employees / economically active population • Age boundaries / activity branches / thresholds • Recommended operationalisation • 3) Some additional indicators should be discussed

  27. Conclusions • Most indicators can provided for Germany, • but: • not necessarily on a yearly basis (SES, LFS Ad hoc Modules) • with large differences regarding timeliness • with some deviations from the (rough) definitions

  28. Many Thanks for your attention! Katharina Puch Federal Statistical Office Germany, Wiesbaden Katharina.Puch@destatis.de

  29. Point for discussion: Possible new indicators • Indicator on children working in atypical hours • Female share of employment in managerial and administrative occupations (ISCO 1) • Time used for commuting • Rate of employees working for a temporary work agency

  30. Dimension 1: Safety and Ethics of Employment Indicator on children* working in atypical hours * Children aged 15-17 years • Of high international relevance • Comparability: as much as the other indicators on child labour • Recommendation  include this indicator Source: German LFS 2008

  31. Dimension 1: Safety and Ethics of Employment Female share of employment in managerial and administrative occupations (ISCO 1) • Of high relevance in Germany • Comparability is given • Recommendation  include this indicator Source: German LFS 2008

  32. Dimension 3: Balancing work and non-working life Time used for commuting • Of high international relevance • Comparability should be given • Recommendation  include this indicator Source: German Microcensus 2008

  33. Rate of employees working for a temporary work agency* Dimension 4 Source: International Confederation of Private Employment Agencies (CIETTE) 2007 * Number of agency workers compared to total employed workforce

More Related