1 / 7

Tinker Vs. Des Moines 1969

Tinker Vs. Des Moines 1969. Condensed. Students are entitled to exercise their constitutional rights even while in school.  Neither “students nor teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” . New Jersey Vs. T.L.O. 1985.

snana
Télécharger la présentation

Tinker Vs. Des Moines 1969

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tinker Vs. Des Moines 1969

  2. Condensed Students are entitled to exercise their constitutional rights even while in school.  Neither “students nor teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” 

  3. New Jersey Vs. T.L.O. 1985

  4. School officials do not need a warrant to justify a search as long as the search was reasonable under the circumstances. The privacy interest of students…

  5. must be balanced against the interest of teachers and school officials in maintaining order and discipline in school.

  6. Condensed Schoolofficialsdo not need to have probable cause to believe that a student has violated school rules in order to initiate a search.  

  7. Instead, school officials are only required to have a “reasonable suspicion” that a student has violated school rules in order to search that student.

More Related