1 / 3

Unholy water wars

Probably a few years back, no one could have thought that water could trigger wars between two states and even two countries. It was very much unlikely. Traditionally the wars had been fought over controlling large territories or chunks of land.

Télécharger la présentation

Unholy water wars

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Unholy Water Wars  Probably a few years back, no one could have thought that water could trigger  wars between two states and even two countries. It was very much unlikely.  Traditionally the wars had been fought over controlling large territories or  chunks of land. A pertinent example are the Mughal wars which were fought  with the purpose of acquiring territories and merging the annexations with the  greater empire. The war fought between India and Pakistan to control or  acquire Kashmir and parts thereof is a recent example among many others  the world over. You would have heard about the wars in the middle east over  control of oil fields, oil that drives economies. Well, in the changed milieu  there is a new reality taking shape now.    With growing population to fend for and limited natural resources at their  disposal, the situation has turned out to be one of potential flashpoint in the  relationship between two states or even two countries that soon find 

  2. themselves in the midst of conflict over controlling the resources. Going back  in history, in the 1960s when the state of Haryana was carved, out of larger  Punjab were the seeds of conflict sown. In India rivers and water resources  drive local economy, mini civilizations flourish along the river banks. Haryana  found itself high and dry, in the literal sense of the phrase. It did not have  enough water to cater to the needs of its population with the situation turning  even uglier in the present times as the state witnessed population explosion in  recent years.    States of Punjab and Haryana have shown reluctance as well as inability to  resolve their disputes over sharing water resources in order to placate its  people. Consequently, both the states have approached the court to settle  their differences. It is widely speculated that a ‘give and take’ kind of quick fix  solution on part of the governments might prove to be a political folly. Punjab  not wanting to let go off the water resources while Haryana determined to  stake control over it. Years back, a decision was taken to build Sutlej-Yamuna  canal that transported water from rivers of Ravi and Beas to the water starved  Haryana and the work had begun on construction of a canal. 

  3. The Punjab government unilaterally stopped the construction of the canal and  this vitiated the atmosphere further that derailed the entire job of finding an  amiable solution at the level of the states.    A couple of years back, the Punjab assembly passed a bill to annul that  decision in contravention to the court decision. The canal is 112 Km long that  passes through four districts of Punjab before entering Haryana. According to  the state bill, the land over which canal was built is to be handed back to the  original land owners, thus putting to an end to Haryana’s hopes of receiving  river water in future. Sensing a major public uproar, the states had been  advised to take preventive steps to ward of any violence that might erupt in its  aftermath. The matter has been referred to the honourable Supreme court to  take further decision on the matter. For now, it has asked the states to  maintain status quo on the matter while it is still subjudice. The final decision  is expected soon.     

More Related