1 / 17

Telergee Conference

Telergee Conference. Discussion Materials prepared for: 2009 Telergee Conference October 15, 2009. Otelco Overview. Acquired and operate 10 RLECs and 2 facilities based CLECs in Alabama, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire and West Virginia

socorro
Télécharger la présentation

Telergee Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Telergee Conference • Discussion Materials prepared for: • 2009 Telergee Conference • October 15, 2009

  2. Otelco Overview • Acquired and operate 10 RLECs and 2 facilities based CLECs in Alabama, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire and West Virginia • Initial Public Offering on December 16, 2004 • Follow-on offering priced June 28, 2007 • As of 6/30/09, operate over 100,000 voice and data access lines and 122,000 wholesale CLEC network connections • LTM Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA of $92.9 million and $43.9 million respectively

  3. Otelco Q2 2009 Metrics Key Operating Statistics

  4. Industry Update • Recent Service Provider Observations • “We expect continuing declines in traditional access lines but offsets in growth in broadband and video services.” (2008 10-K) • “Telegraphs aren't relevant. Wireline voice, whether you're in a rural area or urban area, wireline voice-over copper over time will not be relevant. It is the way that it is.” (Q4 2008 Earnings Call) • “We expect competition to intensify as a result of the entrance of new competitors and the rapid development of new technologies, products and services.” (2008 10-K) • “We have lost access lines primarily because of competition, changing consumer behavior, economic conditions, [and] changing technology…” (2008 10-K) • “As consumers look to reduce expenses, they may be more inclined to discontinue their land line and maintain their wireless phone.” (2008 10-K) • “We continue to see an increasing correlation between our triple-play availability and line retention.” (Q4 2008 Earnings Call) • “Competitive expansions primarily from cable facilities into our service areas are expected to slow in 2009, but we could experience some increased competition from high-speed Internet offerings of wireless competitors.” (2008 10-K) Source: Company filings, Company earnings calls, and Stifel Nicolaus analysis

  5. Industry Update • RLECs are a declining industry • (millions) 2005 2006 2007 2008 • RLEC access lines 158.5 149.8 142.0 128.5 • CLEC facility based lines 10.2 11.1 11.7 11.8 • Total access lines 168.7 160.9 153.7 140.3 • Access lines lost 7.8 7.2 13.4 • Rate of decline 4.6% 4.6% 8.7% • Source: JSI Capital Advisors, Phone Lines 2009

  6. Industry Update • Change in service providers • 2005 2006 2007 2008 • % HH served by telcos 83.7 77.1 71.2 63.0 • % HH served by cable telephony 4.9 7.7 11.8 15.2 • % HH served by wireless only 8.4 12.8 15.8 20.2 • % HH served by telco VOIP .6 1.4 2.0 2.9 • Totals 97.6 99.0 100.8 101.3 • Note: Assumed wireless will have multiple devices beginning in 2007 • Source: NECA Trends Report 2008

  7. Industry Response • ILEC / Cable Battleground Source: Company filings, company press releases, and Stifel Nicolaus analysis Note:(1) Data is as of or for the three month period ended March 31, 2009.

  8. Industry Response • Wireless Data ARPU Year-Over-Year Growth Across the wireless industry, declining voice ARPU is increasingly offset by growing data service ARPU. Since 4Q 2006, data ARPU as a percent of total ARPU has grown 33% on a compound annual basis. 26% 32% 31% 17% 33% Source: Company press releases, research reports and Stifel Nicolaus analysis

  9. Industry Update • Continuing decline in access minutes of use (mou): • 2006 2007 2008 • Access mou 3.671B 3.291B 3.053B • Rate of decline 10.4% 7.24% • Additionally, the revenue per mou is declining due to the increasing percentage of wireless minutes – negative effect on EBITDA • Source: JSI study of 53 companies with access lines ranging from 352 to 80,000

  10. Industry Response • Service Provider Strategies • “Our strategy is to offset [our] line losses by increasing non-access-line-related revenues from customer connections for data, video and voice.” (2008 10-K) • “We continue to focus on increasing our revenues per customer, primarily by improving our DSL and IPTV market penetration…” (2008 10-K) • “We believe there is a high correlation between service quality and the likelihood that our customers will remain with us when presented with a competitive alternative.” (2008 10-K) • “We are going to be able to offer a lot of new products and services to our customers… including customizable bundles [and] business services that leverage [our] high-speed IP data network...” (2008 10-K) • “Our message is that customers need not cut back on their must-have high-speed, video, and voice products when they bundle with Frontier.” (Q4 2008 Earnings Call) • “We will utilize value added services such as speed, content, and features along with unparalleled customer service as a differentiator.” (2008 10-K) • “We believe that broadband, having broadband in the homes is an important part of our service offering.” (Q4 2008 Earnings Call) • “We understand that these are tough times and we want to be competitively priced for that.” (Q4 2008 Earnings Call) • “In the consumer segment, we see the near-term competitive battle for data services moving to affordability rather than top end speed…We are very cognizant of the pocketbook, and [are] moving to introduce product sets focused on affordability.” (Q4 2008 Earnings Call) • “In the current market environment, to stay competitive, we must be able to offera Video product on par with our competitors at a competitive price.” (2008 10-K) Source: Company press releases, research reports and Stifel Nicolaus analysis

  11. Industry Response • Increased efforts to effectively manage costs and operations • Offset access line losses by increasing revenues for data, video and other products • Bundled service offerings

  12. Industry Response • Growth Trends (1) The increased pace of access line erosion in 2008 caused the ILECs to realize negative revenue growth. 2005 2006 2007 2008 Source: Company filings, press releases and Stifel Nicolaus analysis Note: (1) Composite Index is comprised of CenturyTel, D&E, Embarq, Frontier, and Iowa Telecom.

  13. Industry Response • Overall broadband availability to customers served by NECA TS pool companies members reached 92% in 2008 • More than 500 NECA RLEC companies are offering video services • Other products include data storage, transport services, fiber lease, etc. • Source: NECA Trend Report 2008

  14. Industry Response • Consolidation opportunities: • Currently there are 784 independent telcos in the USA • Combining operations provides economies of scale necessary to compete with wireless and cable operators • Opportunities to improve margins by consolidation of administrative and certain back office functions • Current difficulties for acquisitions include declining RLEC values and tight credit markets

  15. Industry Response ILEC Enterprise Valuation Trends – LTM EBITDA Independent ILEC valuations have decreased over time as access line loss continues and DSL and video growth slows. 9.6x 6.7x 6.6x 6.4x 5.3x 5.3x 5.2x 4.8x Source: Company filings, press releases, Stifel Nicolaus Research, Thompson Research, and Stifel Nicolaus analysis.

  16. Industry Response • LIBOR – OIS Spread (bps) (1) 10/10/08 Global Financial Crisis 9/15/08 Lehman Brothers 12/10/07 Bank Writedowns 9/14/07 Northern Rock 3/17/08 Bear Stearns Stable Financial System Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Source: Bloomberg and Stifel Nicolaus analysis Note: (1) LIBOR-OIS spread is the difference between the 3-month LIBOR and the Overnight Index Swap Rate.

  17. Other Items of Interest • Broadband Stimulus • Fairpoint and Hawaii Telecom

More Related