1 / 7

CLT v Traditional | SOLID Structures & Infrastructure

We are seeing a marked increase in clients interested in pursuing a greener and faster build. As with most new technologies, the decision is not a straightforward one. Each projectu2019s unique budget, programme, and sustainability drivers and their relative importance will determine the chosen construction method. Review above presentation for complete information.

solidengineering
Télécharger la présentation

CLT v Traditional | SOLID Structures & Infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CLT v Traditional Traditional Methods of Construction

  2. Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) construction We have put together a fact sheet of all the factors influencing the decision for or against Cross-laminated timber (CLT) construction as opposed to traditional methods of construction.

  3. Pre-construction factors Design Once CLT is in manufacture, no changes can be made to the design. Another factor that is not well known is that different CLT manufacturers have different requirements which will impact building layouts.

  4. Procurement Lovelane Building Traditional construction materials are readily available. The standard form of construction and the roles and responsibilities of all parties are well understood.

  5. Construction factors Speed of construction It will come as no surprise that CLT outperforms traditional forms of construction by a mile as far as speed of construction is concerned due to off- site fabrication of large panel modules. Construction equipment A large crane is typically required to hoist the CLT panels into position whereas a crane is only required for traditional construction when precast concrete slabs are used. 1 2 3 Adaptability CLT is difficult to adapt on site. Future adaptability should be built into the design. Traditional construction is very easy to adapt due to the inherent strength of masonry construction to support and distribute point loads from new beams and lintels.

  6. Element construction FOUNDATIONS The opposite is generally true of traditional construction with construction being heavier requiring deeper, wider foundations and larger/ longer and deeper piles. WALL BUILD UP The overall wall thickness, including CLT panel insulation and finishes, is comparable to well- insulated traditional cavity wall construction. THE THICKNESS OF FLOORS AND CEILINGS Similar to a concrete floor slab (not floor joists), allowance has to be made for a ceiling void for horizontal distribution of services. Acoustic separation may require thicker floor build up for both types of construction. FINISHES CLT panels can be left exposed internally on the walls and ceiling but it will require fair finished panels which is more expensive. With traditional floors and walls, construction is normally covered with finishes. If the interior design dictates exposed finishes, the cost will increase to achieve the desired quality of finish.

  7. Contact Us Phone Number 01608 690 858 Reach out to us for inquiries or comments. Email Address info@solid-engineering.co.uk Website www.solid-engineering.co.uk

More Related