1 / 19

Camp Withycombe Small Arms Firing Ranges Green Remediation-Case Study Sunrise Corridor Project

Camp Withycombe Small Arms Firing Ranges Green Remediation-Case Study Sunrise Corridor Project. Presented by: Len Farr AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. 2011 TRB Waste Management & Resource Efficiency Workshop Portland, Oregon. Project Context Project Background Green Remedy Selection

sonja
Télécharger la présentation

Camp Withycombe Small Arms Firing Ranges Green Remediation-Case Study Sunrise Corridor Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Camp WithycombeSmall Arms Firing RangesGreen Remediation-Case StudySunrise Corridor Project Presented by: Len Farr AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. 2011 TRB Waste Management & Resource Efficiency Workshop Portland, Oregon

  2. Project Context Project Background Green Remedy Selection Implementation Final Numbers Summary Outline

  3. Project Context • ODOTand Clackamas County propose to build a new, east-west oriented, limited-access highway between Interstate 205 and the Rock Creek Junction.

  4. Project Context • The highway corridor transects Camp Withycombe, an Oregon Army National Guard Installation.

  5. Project Context • Soil impacted within highway corridor by small arms firing ranges. • Land within highway corridor potentially contains UXO. • Land within natural area potentially contains UXO.

  6. Project Background • First Camp Withycombe range built in 1909. • Expanded to seven ranges. • Use of ranges discontinued in 2007. • Oregon DEQ was lead regulatory agency. • Other Stakeholders include ODOT, ODFW, USFWS, Clackamas County, SHPO, DSL, and USACE

  7. Green Remedy Selection • Sustainability Components • Energy Requirements • Air Emissions • Impacts on Water Resources • Land and Ecosystem Impacts • Material Consumption • Waste Generation • Future Beneficial Land Use • Long-term Stewardship

  8. Green Remedy Selection • DEQ and OARs • Green Remediation Benefits Quantitative • Feasibility Study Acceptance Highly Dependent on the DEQ Project Manager • Rules do not consider: • social, cultural, and ecological habitat impacts associated with remedy implementation • Feasibility Studies • Protectiveness • Effectiveness • Long-Term Reliability • Implementability • Implementation Risk • Reasonableness of Cost

  9. Green Remedy Selection • Feasibility Studies • Remedial Action Alternatives • No Action • In-Place Containment with Institutional Controls • Excavation with Off-Site Disposal of Untreated HW Soil (dig & haul - presumptive remedy) • Excavation with Off-Site Disposal of Stabilized Treated Soil • Excavation with Ex-Situ Soil Treatment and On-Site Reuse Beneath Asphalt Cap • Excavation with Ex-Situ Soil Treatment Using Stabilization and On-Site Reuse • Treatability Studies • Estimated Lead Removal Efficiency • Estimated Quantity Available for Reuse • Effectiveness of Stabilization Agent (Phosphate)

  10. Implementation Pre-Screen, 2” Plus Dry Screen Gravity Separation Phosphate Amendment

  11. Implementation Former KD Range

  12. Implementation Soil Treatment Plant

  13. Implementation 800 mg/kg or less soil piles ready for reuse at AFRC MILCONProject

  14. Implementation Bullet Fraction Ready for Recycling – Stored in 1-ton Capacity Recycled Sugar Sacks

  15. Final Numbers • Converted nearly 30,000 tons of hazardous waste into reusable material, at a cost savings of more than $5 million • Recovered about 270 tons of lead bullets for recycling • Created 4,400 tons of structural fill, at cost savings of about $150,000 • Treated 7,145 tons of material to level suitable for reuse in project area, at a cost savings of about $228,400

  16. Final Numbers • Donated whole trees to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife for use in stream habitat restoration projects and 25 trees to the Outdoor Forestry Learning Center • Relocated over 100 trees creating native habitat during reforestation • Treated and reused all treatment process water for irrigation • Recycled asphalt and base rock from one-acre treatment pad • Recycled 62 tons of scrap metal and steel generated during project

  17. Final Numbers • Eliminated more than 1,480 truck trips through the Columbia RiverGorge National Scenic Area, preventing: • 355,200 truck miles • 83,000 gallons of diesel fuel, at a cost savings of about $415,000 • 914 pounds of particulate matter • 1,859,200 Pounds of CO2 • 36,543 pounds of NOx • 1,672 pounds of SOx

  18. Summary • Recycled many materials and wastes generated during project. • Drastically reduced quantity of fossil fuels required, and avoided discharge of air pollutants in the Columbia Gorge National Scenic Area. • Saved ORARNG nearly $6 million as compared to traditional hog and haul.

  19. Questions? 2009 Secretary of the Army Environmental AwardEnvironmental Restoration Category Left: Addison “Tad” Davis, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health Right: Jim Arnold, Oregon Military Department, Restoration Manager

More Related