1 / 17

July 2010 Report on Oasis Data for 2007,2008,2009 & 2010 (YTD May)

July 2010 Report on Oasis Data for 2007,2008,2009 & 2010 (YTD May). Atlanta, Georgia July 20-21, 2010 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon. ACTION ITEM: January- 2010 Report OASIS data over a 3 year time frame to determine if any trends exist. Executive Summary.

stacey-daniels
Télécharger la présentation

July 2010 Report on Oasis Data for 2007,2008,2009 & 2010 (YTD May)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. July 2010 Report on Oasis Data for2007,2008,2009 & 2010 (YTD May) Atlanta, Georgia July 20-21, 2010 R. Darrell TaylorRaytheon

  2. ACTION ITEM: January- 2010 • Report OASIS data over a 3 year time frame to determine if any trends exist.

  3. Executive Summary • The process has not changed statistically from 2008 to 2009 – 2007 was not normal in comparison • Majors are written app. Every 4 audits, seeing a change in 2010 • App. 3 Minors are written every audit, no change, consistent • Feedback usually closes quickly but a small percentage stay open for months

  4. Agenda • CRB Activity • Entries – Audits • Nonconformities • Scores • AS9100 Elements • Feedback • Proposed Monitoring Model

  5. Comparison of Entries 2007,2008, 2009 7 first 5 months 2010 • Entries: • 2007 – 5114 • 2008 – 4529 (DB error) • 2009 - 5001 • 2010 – 1385 • (as of May) As of May, only 27% of data in with 42% of year gone

  6. Comparison of Types2007 -2010 SUR=Surveillance REC = Recertification INT = Initial If pace holds, we will have about ½ the number of initials

  7. Standards Entered Into Database App. 2% increase in 9120 activity, note minimal data entry errors

  8. Ratio- Total Nonconformities/Entries Totals 2010 – 13,166* 2009 -14,838 2008 -13,095 2007 – 14,957 * At current pace 2007 not normal, 214 10 or more majors, one with 20…

  9. Ratio Majors/Entries Totals 2010 - 203 2009 -1135 2008 – 976 2007 - 870 On average, one Major is written every fourth audit – NOTE: Average up to 6.6 audits for 2010

  10. Ratio Minors/Entries Totals 2010 – 3,352 2009 -13,703 2008 -12,119 2007 –14,087 On average, 2.8 Minors are written every audit, no significant change from the past

  11. AS9100 Nonconformities Top 15 Top Ten 2009 same as 2008

  12. Feedback Analysis 2008 2009 2007 2009 average 112 per month, none in December

  13. Time – Line, Data Presentation JAN MAR JUL SEP First 6 Months Summary Previous Year Summary RULE VIOLATORS

  14. Certification Body Statistical Assessment Model General - 1 Criteria Feedback - 2 Criteria OASIS Results - 3 Criteria ANAB Audits - 6 Criteria

  15. Threshold Violations • RMC & ANAB need to research • ANAB to report to RMC • ANAB to investigate • No Action

  16. Take Aways • Data Entry – accuracy counts • Looking for Outliers • Increased oversight supported by data

  17. Questions

More Related